Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2002-09-10 Thread FUJIMOTO Kou
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Maksim Yevmenkin writes: I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very few replies from few people (Julian Elischer, Terry Lambert - thanks!) and

unsubscribe

2002-09-10 Thread Ekaterina Kochetkova
unsubscribe -- katty To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Uncommitted dc0 fixes ...

2002-09-10 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, and Martins patch: This one works standalone and with 2 and 3 above. It seems to have increase ftp transfer rates too from 8600Kbytes/sec to 10577Kbytes/sec. Cool. Ofcourse, for some odd reason, if the ftp was done from a Windows XP Pro machine, it's only 6722KBytes/sec. Hmm.

Re: Uncommitted dc0 fixes ...

2002-09-10 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, 1) dc driver uses wrong case to read MAC from eeprom. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/35482 This one seems to break data sending/receiving as the only thing that works is pinging and that's only on the alias/secondary IP and not the primary IP network which is

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Bruce Evans
The locking changes in union_link() need a thorough review, though the light testing of that I performed didn't turn up any glaring problems. The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top.

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote: The locking changes in union_link() need a thorough review, though the light testing of that I performed didn't turn up any glaring problems. The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I wonder why everything wasn't

Re: Kernel hangs during boot - latest cvsup

2002-09-10 Thread Sid Carter
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:09:05 -1000 (HST), Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Vincent On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Vincent Poy wrote: Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec --- boot -v might

Re: Kernel hangs during boot - latest cvsup

2002-09-10 Thread Sid Carter
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:37:45 -0700 (PDT), Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Julian On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Vincent Poy wrote: I compiled the kernel last nite and I haven't been able to boot into the system with that kernel. This is where the kernel hangs

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote: On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote: The locking changes in union_link() need a thorough review, though the light testing of that I performed didn't turn up any glaring problems. The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote: On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote: On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote: The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top. Could it have been because locking all the way down is harmful?

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruce Evans wrote: The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top. Could it have been because locking all the way down is harmful? For a stacked local media FS, you can end up with a deadlock, if a lower vnode is

Re: Kernel hangs during boot - latest cvsup

2002-09-10 Thread Vincent Poy
On 10 Sep 2002, Sid Carter wrote: On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:09:05 -1000 (HST), Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Vincent On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Vincent Poy wrote: Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec

Re: Uncommitted dc0 fixes ...

2002-09-10 Thread Vincent Poy
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Martin Blapp wrote: Hi, 1) dc driver uses wrong case to read MAC from eeprom. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/35482 This one seems to break data sending/receiving as the only thing that works is pinging and that's only on the alias/secondary IP

Re: Uncommitted dc0 fixes ...

2002-09-10 Thread Vincent Poy
Hi Martin: On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Martin Blapp wrote: and Martins patch: This one works standalone and with 2 and 3 above. It seems to have increase ftp transfer rates too from 8600Kbytes/sec to 10577Kbytes/sec. Cool. Seems to depend on which notebook the card is in. With the

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote: On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote: On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote: The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top. Could it have been because

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Sep, Terry Lambert wrote: Bruce Evans wrote: The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top. Could it have been because locking all the way down is harmful? For a stacked local media FS, you can end up with

freeze with the CardBus NIC 3CCFE575BT

2002-09-10 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Regardless of whether the xl driver is linked into the kernel or loaded as a module, the machine freezes shortly after ifconfig-ing the card. Sunday's -current. Complete freeeze -- can not go into debugger... More information available upon request... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: ACPI video driver (for Dell Latitude C640)

2002-09-10 Thread Mark Santcroos
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:11:15PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: I worked around this by making the driver a child of pci instead of a child of acpi. (Which is even more correct too) My driver is a child of acpi again and at this point it always seems to be called at resume too. I don't know

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote: The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top. Could it have been because locking all the way down is harmful? I think this is because some places are still worrying

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-09-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote: I have just one thing to add to Robert's reply. BTW, is it safe to call ASSERT_VOP_UNLOCKED() in the SMP case after the reference has been dropped with vput() or vrele()? I think it is. It has some internal locking (v_interlock at least), and only

Re: [acpi-jp 1789] Re: ACPI video driver (for Dell Latitude C640)

2002-09-10 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:11:15PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: I worked around this by making the driver a child of pci instead of a child of acpi. (Which is even more correct too) My driver is a child of acpi again and at this point it always seems to be called at resume too. I don't

Re: [acpi-jp 1789] Re: ACPI video driver (for Dell Latitude C640)

2002-09-10 Thread Mark Santcroos
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:22:04AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: It seems that old laptops don't have VGA specific ACPI objects, so many people will be happy if we can implement non-ACPI VGA driver w/ ATI chips hack. BTW, have you checked for XFree86 code? Hopefully we might find some hints

acpi on compaq 1701CL with current.

2002-09-10 Thread Edwin Culp
I just bought an new battery and that combined with the fact that I've seen so many recent emails about acpi that I decided to check my laptop. I've never really been able to take advantage of acpi with it and may never be able to, but previously I was able to do an acpidump and now I get:

Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2002-09-10 Thread Chris Dillon
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very few replies from few people (Julian Elischer, Terry Lambert - thanks!) and that's it. I'm very interested, as

Build failure rpm

2002-09-10 Thread Beech Rintoul
I was trying to update linux_base and got the following build failure: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../build -I../misc -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-char-subscripts -c cpio.c

Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2002-09-10 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
FUJIMOTO Kou wrote: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Maksim Yevmenkin writes: I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very few replies from few people (Julian Elischer,

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-09-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2002-09-10 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: : : I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that : FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very : few replies from few

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-09-10 Thread Andrew R. Reiter
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: :cc1: warnings being treated as errors :/local0/scratch/des/src/sys/dev/cardbus/cardbus.c: In function `cardbus_driver_added': :/local0/scratch/des/src/sys/dev/cardbus/cardbus.c:319: warning: unused variable :`cardattached' :*** Error code 1 I

Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2002-09-10 Thread Duncan Barclay
On 10-Sep-2002 M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: : : I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that : FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at

Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2002-09-10 Thread Julian Elischer
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Chris Dillon wrote: On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very few replies from few people (Julian Elischer, Terry Lambert -

panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir

2002-09-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
I got this on the bento cluster this morning (-current from about 2 days ago): /x: bad dir ino 3180135 at offset 0: mangled entry panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir Debugger(panic) Stopped at Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 db trace Debugger(c03f45bc,c0473f80,c040e087,ceac4974,)

Re: Build failure rpm

2002-09-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 08:21:31AM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote: I was trying to update linux_base and got the following build failure: Known problem; see the list archives for a patch. Kris msg42849/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[no subject]

2002-09-10 Thread current
subscribe freebsd-current [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2002-09-10 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Julian, On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Chris Dillon wrote: On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very few replies from few people (Julian Elischer, Terry

Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2002-09-10 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Am Di, 2002-09-10 um 19.48 schrieb Julian Elischer: On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Chris Dillon wrote: On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very

Re: kern_timeout.c msg Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc026f3ec(0xc4067800) 0.006773207

2002-09-10 Thread Bill Fenner
I've seen the scrn_timer() one too: Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc049b3f0(0xc0657200) 0.003659743 c049b3f0 t scrn_timer as well as uma_timeout(). Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc047c6b0(0) 0.002146136 c047c6b0 t uma_timeout Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: [acpi-jp 1789] Re: ACPI video driver (for Dell Latitude C640)

2002-09-10 Thread Mark Santcroos
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:22:04AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: Do you think that there is a change that this is in the direction of DPMS, or is that very unliky? I tried to find the spec for DPMS but it seems to be a closed on (at least to non-members). It seems that old laptops don't

Re: freeze with the CardBus NIC 3CCFE575BT

2002-09-10 Thread Vincent Poy
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Regardless of whether the xl driver is linked into the kernel or loaded as a module, the machine freezes shortly after ifconfig-ing the card. Sunday's -current. Complete freeeze -- can not go into debugger... More information available upon

Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD

2002-09-10 Thread Bakul Shah
Yes. we are aware of the work and we are pleased that it is hapenning, but few of us have even SEEN any bluetooth stuff yet.. certainly in the US it's not yet being marketted a lot. Fry's Electronics in the SF bayarea has a bunch of bluetooth gadgets. Go to www.outpost.com and search for

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote: On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote: I have just one thing to add to Robert's reply. BTW, is it safe to call ASSERT_VOP_UNLOCKED() in the SMP case after the reference has been dropped with vput() or vrele()? I think it is. It has some internal locking

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote: On 11 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote: On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote: I have just one thing to add to Robert's reply. BTW, is it safe to call ASSERT_VOP_UNLOCKED() in the SMP case after the reference has been dropped with vput() or vrele()?

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Sep, Robert Watson wrote: On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote: I'm mostly worried about the vnode being recycled as something else after the vput() or vrele() call. I think a better approach would be to add the assertion checks to vput() and vrele(), which would mean that we could

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Robert Watson wrote: ... Also, last time I tried to use the ddb show lockedvnods command, I got the problem attached below due to locking issues, which makes it a lot harder to debug locking problems... Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Robert Watson wrote: ... Also, last time I tried to use the ddb show lockedvnods command, I got the problem attached below due to locking issues, which makes it a lot harder to debug locking problems... Robert N M Watson

Re: Build failure rpm

2002-09-10 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 10:11 am, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 08:21:31AM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote: I was trying to update linux_base and got the following build failure: Known problem; see the list archives for a patch. Kris Already applied those patches, still

It works ! (was Re: Unable to buildworld (new record, 18))

2002-09-10 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 08-Sep-2002 (19:54:17/GMT) Riccardo Torrini wrote: There have been at least two gcc upgrades since then. I believe the easiest way to upgrade to today's -current would be to install a fairly recent snapshot ... instead of trying to debug ... I have tryed with a middle version (1 jul

Re: vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_link()

2002-09-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 9 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: On 9 Sep, Robert Watson wrote: What I'd actually like to do is lock vp on going in to the VOP. I need to grab the lock in the link() code anyway to do the MAC check. UFS and others all immediately lock the vnode on entry anyway... Here's a patch to

vnode lock assertion problem in nfs_rename()

2002-09-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 9 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: nfs_link() contains the following code: /* * Push all writes to the server, so that the attribute cache * doesn't get out of sync with the server. * XXX There should be a better way! */ VOP_FSYNC(vp,

-current buildworld fails with revision 1.38 src/usr.bin/uudecode/uudecode.c

2002-09-10 Thread Vincent Poy
=== usr.bin/uudecode /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/usr.bin/uudecode created for /usr/src/usr.bin/uudecode rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a-D__FBSDID=__RCSID /usr/src/usr.bin/uudecode/uudecode.c echo uudecode: /usr/lib/libc.a .depend cc -O -pipe -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W

World broken at uudecode [Sep 10]

2002-09-10 Thread walt
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wno-uninitialized -c /usr/src/usr.bin/uudecode/uudecode.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors

Re: World broken at uudecode [Sep 10]

2002-09-10 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 05:09:55PM -0700, walt wrote: cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wno-uninitialized -c

Re: Locking problems in exec

2002-09-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 7 Sep, Garrett Wollman wrote: I just noted the following: ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with process lock locked from ../../../kern/kern_exec.c:368 lock order reversal 1st 0xc438e6a8 process lock (process lock) @ ../../../kern/kern_exec.c:368 2nd 0xc0413d20 filelist lock

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-09-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: It works ! (was Re: Unable to buildworld (new record, 18))

2002-09-10 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-09-11 00:04, Riccardo Torrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now last doubt: after next upgrade to post-gcc_3.2 is a complete port rebuild necessary because c++ ports stop working or not? Yes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the

Re: Locking problems in exec

2002-09-10 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote: On 7 Sep, Garrett Wollman wrote: I just noted the following: ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with process lock locked from ../../../kern/kern_exec.c:368 lock order reversal 1st 0xc438e6a8 process lock (process lock) @

Re: Locking problems in exec

2002-09-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Sep, Nate Lawson wrote: I'm not sure why fdcheckstd() and setugidsafety() couldn't both happen before grabbing the proc lock. Dropping locks in the middle or pre-allocating should always be a last resort. That is ok as long as there aren't other threads that can mess things up after

uudecode troubles in sharte/tabset.

2002-09-10 Thread walt
uudecode compiles again, but now I'm getting this making world: === share/tabset uudecode /usr/src/share/tabset/3101.uu uudecode /usr/src/share/tabset/9837.uu uudecode: stdin: 9837: character out of range: [33-96] *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/share/tabset. Dunno whether the problem is

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-09-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: uudecode troubles in sharte/tabset.

2002-09-10 Thread Mike Barcroft
walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: uudecode compiles again, but now I'm getting this making world: === share/tabset uudecode /usr/src/share/tabset/3101.uu uudecode /usr/src/share/tabset/9837.uu uudecode: stdin: 9837: character out of range: [33-96] *** Error code 1 Stop in

Re: Locking problems in exec

2002-09-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: On 10 Sep, Nate Lawson wrote: I'm not sure why fdcheckstd() and setugidsafety() couldn't both happen before grabbing the proc lock. Dropping locks in the middle or pre-allocating should always be a last resort. That is ok as long as there aren't other threads