Re: disklabel doesnt let root to edit labels anymore?

2002-09-22 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:32:47PM +0300, mika ruohotie wrote: eh? it seems regardless of the flags i'm giving to disklabel it prevents me from editing/restoring/whatever labels. only thing i can do is to read them. What error are you getting? -- Crist J. Clark |

Trouble Building CURRENT on STABLE, cpp seg. fault

2002-09-22 Thread Crist J. Clark
I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment? -- Kernel build for GOKU started on Sat Sep 21

Re: libc error question answered (partly)

2002-09-22 Thread Tim Robbins
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:21:15PM -0700, walt wrote: walt wrote: My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder was modified in March of 2001(?) David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort' is completely different in -STABLE, which I've just

Re: disklabel doesnt let root to edit labels anymore? (some details)

2002-09-22 Thread mika ruohotie
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 11:40:00PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote: On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:32:47PM +0300, mika ruohotie wrote: eh? it seems regardless of the flags i'm giving to disklabel it prevents me from editing/restoring/whatever labels. only thing i can do is What error are you

[no subject]

2002-09-22 Thread Koop Mast
subscribe hackers To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Trouble Building CURRENT on STABLE, cpp seg. fault

2002-09-22 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Works for me: Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Sun Sep 22 07:43:35 MSD 2002 $ uname -a FreeBSD golf.macomnet.net 4.6-20020805-MACOMNET-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-20020805-MACOMNET-STABLE #19: Fri Sep 20 17:09:52 MSD 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GOLF i386. -- Maxim Konovalov,

Re: libc error question answered (partly)

2002-09-22 Thread walt
Tim Robbins wrote: On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:21:15PM -0700, walt wrote: walt wrote: My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder was modified in March of 2001(?) David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort' is completely different in -STABLE, which

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-09-22 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

failure in make buildworld

2002-09-22 Thread Christoph Kukulies
I tried to build glade2 (IDE for gtk toolkit) under my 4.6R system but the port build failed in building the esd (esound) server or whatever this is. To make a long story short: I cvsuped and started make buildworld which ran into an error: === lib/libbz2 rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a

Re: Trouble Building CURRENT on STABLE, cpp seg. fault

2002-09-22 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-09-21 23:53, Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment? It isn't just you. The same error stopped my

Re: Followup to XFree86-4-Server and lcms problems

2002-09-22 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:59:29PM +0300, Vallo Kallaste vallo wrote: In case someone is interested about consistent test case, here's additional info. Now I built both world and kernel with CPUTYPE=p2 and kan's patch. I haven't changed anything except uncommenting the aforementioned CPUTYPE

World broken in ncurses ?!

2002-09-22 Thread Marc Recht
With -current sources as of today: cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-xp -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libncurses -I/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses -I/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include -Wall -DFREEBSD_NATIVE -DNDEBUG -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DTERMIOS -c lib_keyname.c -o

Re: Trouble Building CURRENT on STABLE, cpp seg. fault

2002-09-22 Thread qhwt
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:44:54PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2002-09-21 23:53, Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem with building CURRENT on

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c

2002-09-22 Thread Stephen McKay
On Friday, 20th September 2002, Martin Blapp wrote: I think we would have to test all cases with all cards. What cards do you have Stephen, with which clone Chipsets ? Can you make a list of them ? I've only got DE500 (genuine Intel 21143) and Macronix 98715AEC cards. Nothing PCMCIA or CardBus.

/usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before fd_set

2002-09-22 Thread Josef Karthauser
I'm trying to work out why the latest version of coldsync won't compile on -current, even though it compiles on -stable. I'm getting the compile time error: /usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before fd_set The coldsync header file looks like: #include config.h #include

signal 12 - lotsa

2002-09-22 Thread Christoph Kukulies
In a 4.6 environment I'm trying to upgrade to -current but make installworld as well as kernelbuild fails with signal 12 lots of. Seems that new system calls and a mix of old kernel and new binaries is now fighting against another on my system. How can I get out of this situation? Boot from a

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c

2002-09-22 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, I just got a report from a user which has several dc cards with all the broken mac adresses. dc0@pci0:13:0: class=0x02 card=0x05741317 chip=0x09851317 rev=0x11 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Admtek Inc' device = 'ADM983 fast ethernet controller' class= network subclass =

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c

2002-09-22 Thread Stephen McKay
On Friday, 20th September 2002, Martin Blapp wrote: mbr 2002/09/20 08:18:13 PDT Modified files: sys/pci if_dc.c Log: Fix the support for the AN985/983 chips, which do not set the RXSTATE to STOPPED, but to WAIT. This should fix hangs which could only be

Re: /usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before fd_set

2002-09-22 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-09-22 14:33, Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to work out why the latest version of coldsync won't compile on -current, even though it compiles on -stable. I'm getting the compile time error: /usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before fd_set The

Re: /usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before fd_set

2002-09-22 Thread Marc Recht
I'm trying to work out why the latest version of coldsync won't compile on -current, even though it compiles on -stable. I'm getting the compile time error: /usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before fd_set The coldsync header file looks like: What header am I missing

Cant see ACPI thermal zones on a Supermicro P6DBU

2002-09-22 Thread David P. Reese Jr.
Does anyone know a reason why i should not see any info about the thermal zones on a Supermicro P6DBU in sysctl? I'm not even seeing the acpi_tz's in dmesg. As far as i know, the board does have thermal sensors. I can check the cpu temperatures in bios. If it would help, i could also provide

Re: -mcpu=pentiumpro still evil?

2002-09-22 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:10:51 -0500 (CDT) Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone else still seeing Sig 11's from GCC when mcpu=pentiumpro is enabled (as it appears to be by default now)? I get a segfault in the same place every time when compiling a DIAGNOSTIC kernel when I

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c

2002-09-22 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, ... I thought I should explicitly mention that merging this particular change as it stands is a bad idea because PNIC and Davicom cards (at least) are not yet correctly handled. The code in -stable is the old broken but apparently harmless code. This new code is attempting to be more

buildworld fails in gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc with an internal error

2002-09-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, I try to update -current form Aug 26 to -current from today: ---snip--- === gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc c++ -O -pipe-D__FBSDID=__RCSID -I/big/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../co ntrib/gperf/lib -I/big/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf -c /big/usr/src/contrib/gperf/s rc/bool-array.cc c++ -O -pipe

Re: buildworld fails in gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc with an internal error

2002-09-22 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 17:20:14 +0200 Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexander, can you get me a backtrace from the failed GCC process? What process it is, by the way? GCC, CC1, CPP1? -- Alexander Kabaev To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Fixing ports/palm/coldsync.

2002-09-22 Thread Josef Karthauser
Has anyone here got the time to help me out? I want to fix the uvisor code so that it works properly, but am getting caught up trying to fix the coldsync port. It compiles on -stable, but has been broken on -current for a while. Something changed in the fd_set area and it's not compiled for a

Re: buildworld fails in gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc with an internal error

2002-09-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 11:27:08 -0400 Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexander, can you get me a backtrace from the failed GCC process? What process it is, by the way? GCC, CC1, CPP1? This is with a gcc 3.1 world, the internal error is in stage 1: bootstrap tools and gcc 3.2 isn't

netns

2002-09-22 Thread Erik Greenwald
Does anyone use src/sys/netns (xerox networking)? it's currently uncompilable, seems to have been so for a while, and sys/conf/NOTES says it's provided for amusement value, and are only shipped due to interest. I wouldn't mind seeing it go away in -current and if someone wants it, they can cvs

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 20020922163034.GA29873@freya, Erik Greenwald writes: Does anyone use src/sys/netns (xerox networking)? it's currently uncompilable, seems to have been so for a while, and sys/conf/NOTES says it's provided for amusement value, and are only shipped due to interest. I wouldn't mind

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Keith Sklower did that work. PORTS? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: buildworld fails in gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc with an internal error

2002-09-22 Thread Alexander Kabaev
This is with a gcc 3.1 world, the internal error is in stage 1: bootstrap tools and gcc 3.2 isn't build at this point. Do you still want the backtrace? Yes. If yes: I can't find a *.core in /usr/{src,obj}, there's no coredump limit, so how do I get the backtrace? I already tried to go

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Julian Elischer
I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware connectivity. I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move up to 5.x. On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Erik Greenwald wrote: Does anyone use src/sys/netns (xerox networking)? it's currently uncompilable, seems to

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju lian Elischer writes: I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware connectivity. I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move up to 5.x. Well, they'd better get somebody to fix it then because if it doesn't at least

expensive timeouts?

2002-09-22 Thread Koop Mast
hi does somebody know what this is? those timeouts show up at boot after the harddisk is detected and when enter or page-up and page-down in combo with scroll-lock is pressed. the box works fine uname -a FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Sun Sep 22 19:22:37 CEST 2002

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Julian Elischer
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju lian Elischer writes: I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware connectivity. I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move up to 5.x. Well, they'd better get

current.freebsd.org points to japanese site?

2002-09-22 Thread Kenneth Culver
Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese snapshot site snapshots.jp.freebsd.org? I'm just wondering because I am trying to install -CURRENT on one of my machines. Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: current.freebsd.org points to japanese site?

2002-09-22 Thread Will Andrews
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:33:24PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese snapshot site snapshots.jp.freebsd.org? I'm just wondering because I am trying to install -CURRENT on one of my machines. Because it's the only reliable current snapshot building

Re: current.freebsd.org points to japanese site?

2002-09-22 Thread Kenneth Culver
Is there any difference between the snapshots built on the japanese site and the ones that were built on the US one? Thanks Ken On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Will Andrews wrote: On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:33:24PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese

Who broke sort(1) ?

2002-09-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
flat# date | sort +5n sort: open failed: +5n: No such file or directory This breaks the build in libncurses... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what

Re: Fixing ports/palm/coldsync.

2002-09-22 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:42:32PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: Has anyone here got the time to help me out? I want to fix the uvisor code so that it works properly, but am getting caught up trying to fix the coldsync port. It compiles on -stable, but has been broken on -current for a

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread John Hay
Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. I believe there are people whi use it in -stabel for netware connectivity. I think that not having it would be a killer for them when they try move up to 5.x. On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Erik Greenwald wrote: Does anyone use

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

2002-09-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Poul-Henning Kamp writes: flat# date | sort +5n sort: open failed: +5n: No such file or directory This breaks the build in libncurses... Ok, nailed it down. this commit, is the culprit. I guess it changes the fts ABI in some subtle way because backing the change

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

2002-09-22 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:17:41PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: flat# date | sort +5n sort: open failed: +5n: No such file or directory This breaks the build in libncurses... POSIX via wollman. See revision 1.58 of /usr/include/unistd.h, i.e., /* Define the versions we target for

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Terry Lambert
John Hay wrote: Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from XNS. FWIW. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread John Hay
John Hay wrote: Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from XNS. So you are agreeing with me that to use netns to do ipx when we have netipx

Re: current.freebsd.org points to japanese site?

2002-09-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kenneth Culver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Is there any difference between the snapshots built on the japanese site : and the ones that were built on the US one? Thanks Not really. No differences that are important. (eg, different machine names, snapjp

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c

2002-09-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : Hi, : : ... I thought I should explicitly mention that merging this particular : change as it stands is a bad idea because PNIC and Davicom cards (at least) : are not yet correctly handled. The code in

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c

2002-09-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stephen McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Friday, 20th September 2002, Martin Blapp wrote: : : I think we would have to test all cases with all cards. What cards : do you have Stephen, with which clone Chipsets ? Can you make a list : of them ? : :

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c

2002-09-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : Hi Mark, : : I have a Netgear FA510 (32-bit CardBus). : : cardbus0: Expecting link target, got 0x0 : cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=80 : cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS:

Re: /usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before fd_set

2002-09-22 Thread Mike Barcroft
Marc Recht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm trying to work out why the latest version of coldsync won't compile on -current, even though it compiles on -stable. I'm getting the compile time error: /usr/include/sys/select.h:61: syntax error before fd_set The coldsync header

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c

2002-09-22 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, OpenBSD gets these cards right. I've not ported their code to our system at this time. I know that the problem is due to our not reading the SEEPROM correctly. I talked to the openbsd folks about this a long time ago, but didn't have the time needed to follow up. Thanks for the tip.

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Terry Lambert
John Hay wrote: Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from XNS. So you are agreeing with me that to use netns to do ipx when we have

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-09-22 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Trouble Building CURRENT on STABLE, cpp seg. fault

2002-09-22 Thread qhwt
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:22:23PM +0900, I wrote: On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:44:54PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2002-09-21 23:53, Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this

Re: -mcpu=pentiumpro still evil?

2002-09-22 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:10:51 -0500 (CDT) Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone else still seeing Sig 11's from GCC when mcpu=pentiumpro is enabled (as it appears to be by default now)? I get a segfault in the same place every

Re: Fixing ports/palm/coldsync.

2002-09-22 Thread Mike Barcroft
Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:42:32PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: Has anyone here got the time to help me out? I want to fix the uvisor code so that it works properly, but am getting caught up trying to fix the coldsync port. It compiles on

Re: Fixing ports/palm/coldsync.

2002-09-22 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 07:47:20PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:42:32PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: Has anyone here got the time to help me out? I want to fix the uvisor code so that it works properly, but am

ldconfig in /etc/rc /etc/rc.d/ldconfig

2002-09-22 Thread Bakul Shah
If the ldconfig_insecure flag is set in /etc/rc.conf, ldconfig doesn't do anything useful at startup time except complain. The following patch should fix it. diff -ur /usr/src/etc/rc ./rc --- /usr/src/etc/rc Tue Sep 17 21:02:01 2002 +++ ./rcSun Sep 22 16:49:19 2002 @@ -692,9 +692,10

Re: Trouble Building CURRENT on STABLE, cpp seg. fault

2002-09-22 Thread Jim Bloom
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2002-09-21 23:53, Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment? It isn't just

i386 machine/endian.h

2002-09-22 Thread Wesley Morgan
I've been playing around with lang/icc a bit, and find it quite vexing that machine/endian.h has macros that are ifdef'd around __GNUC__. The intel compiler does not like the macros, partly because they are split across multiple lines and possibly for other reasons. It seems to me that making a

Re: buildworld fails in gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc with an internal error

2002-09-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 13:47:26 -0400 Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If yes: I can't find a *.core in /usr/{src,obj}, there's no coredump limit, so how do I get the backtrace? I already tried to go into gnu/usr.bin/gperf and make a make cleandir; make cleandir; make, but I don't

Re: i386 machine/endian.h

2002-09-22 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Wesley Morgan wrote: I've been playing around with lang/icc a bit, and find it quite vexing that machine/endian.h has macros that are ifdef'd around __GNUC__. The intel compiler does not like the macros, partly because they are split across multiple lines and possibly

Re: i386 machine/endian.h

2002-09-22 Thread Wesley Morgan
As far as I can tell there are no __bswap* macros in the libraries; they are defined as bswap*. Whatever should be happening, the network byte swapping functions are creeping in using the __hton* and __ntoh* macros. These are pulling in the __bswap* functions that are of course undefined. Unless

Re: buildworld fails in gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc with an internal error

2002-09-22 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 08:10:38PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: What about a ktrace -i: http://www.leidinger.net/ktrace.out.bz2 (~50k), please tell me when you got it, I want to remove it then. What you want to do is, figure out exactly which program is crashing. Add -v to your gcc

Re: i386 machine/endian.h

2002-09-22 Thread Mike Barcroft
Wesley Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been playing around with lang/icc a bit, and find it quite vexing that machine/endian.h has macros that are ifdef'd around __GNUC__. The intel compiler does not like the macros, partly because they are split across multiple lines and possibly for

Re: VESA 800x600 console not working

2002-09-22 Thread David Xu
I have two patches: http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/vm86.diff http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/vm86_2.diff the first patch is to keep vm86lock as a sleep lock, and allow the thread calling vm86 bios could be preempted, but still only one thread can call vm86 bios. so if we want a sleep

Re: i386 machine/endian.h

2002-09-22 Thread Mike Barcroft
Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Wesley Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been playing around with lang/icc a bit, and find it quite vexing that machine/endian.h has macros that are ifdef'd around __GNUC__. The intel compiler does not like the macros, partly because they are

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

2002-09-22 Thread Tim Robbins
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 01:43:38PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:17:41PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: flat# date | sort +5n sort: open failed: +5n: No such file or directory This breaks the build in libncurses... POSIX via wollman. See revision

Re: i386 machine/endian.h

2002-09-22 Thread marius
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 09:57:57PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Wesley Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been playing around with lang/icc a bit, and find it quite vexing that machine/endian.h has macros that are ifdef'd around __GNUC__. The

Re: -mcpu=pentiumpro still evil?

2002-09-22 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 18:51:14 -0500 (CDT) Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing the segfault in the kernel make depend step, just as someone else reported. OK, could you please try the patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff and let me know the results. --

Re: Trouble Building CURRENT on STABLE, cpp seg. fault

2002-09-22 Thread Alexander Kabaev
I am asking people having CPP0 dying with SIG11 to try the patch at URL below. Success/failure reports are appreciated. http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff -- Alexander Kabaev To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread John Hay
Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from XNS. So you are agreeing with me that to use netns to do ipx when we have netipx does

Re: Who broke sort(1) ?

2002-09-22 Thread Mike Barcroft
Tim Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 01:43:38PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:17:41PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: flat# date | sort +5n sort: open failed: +5n: No such file or directory This breaks the build in libncurses...

Re: i386 machine/endian.h

2002-09-22 Thread Mike Barcroft
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 09:57:57PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This was my fault. I wasn't paying attention closely to issues with other compilers. I've had the attached patch in my local tree for

Re: netns

2002-09-22 Thread Julian Elischer
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, John Hay wrote: Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from XNS. So you are agreeing with me that to