libfetch/http.c with -Werror

2002-10-27 Thread Jun Kuriyama
It seems _http_growbuf() should return int at the end of function? Index: http.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libfetch/http.c,v retrieving revision 1.61 diff -u -r1.61 http.c --- http.c 3 Oct 2002 10:42:19 - 1.61

Re: status of npx patch |= PCB_NPXINITDONE?

2002-10-27 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Daniel Flickinger wrote: I placed your patch for npx in my kernel builds for 25 and 26 Oct ... I have not had xemacs under X lock-up since --and it was downright regular prior. Is this the reason? Will the patch be committed? Time stamps are GMT.

Re: 5-current crashing when booting SMP

2002-10-27 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Saturday, 26 October 2002 at 21:35:13 -0400, Scott Dodson wrote: Over the past few weeks I've had continuous problems booting my 5-current system with an SMP kernel. Immediately after the system has booted and the login screen displays the machine panics. The motherboard is an Abit BP6.

Re: 5-current crashing when booting SMP

2002-10-27 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-27 ] [ Subjecte: Re: 5-current crashing when booting SMP ] On Saturday, 26 October 2002 at 21:35:13 -0400, Scott Dodson wrote: Over the past few weeks I've had continuous problems booting my 5-current system with an SMP

Re: 5-current crashing when booting SMP

2002-10-27 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Sunday, 27 October 2002 at 1:06:11 -0700, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-27 ] [ Subjecte: Re: 5-current crashing when booting SMP ] On Saturday, 26 October 2002 at 21:35:13 -0400, Scott Dodson wrote: Over the past few weeks I've had

makewhatis[.local] issues

2002-10-27 Thread Doug Barton
Howdy, Two things related to the new makewhatis. First, shouldn't it be in /usr/sbin? It's not really a command we'd expect users to run. Second, /etc/periodic/weekly/320.whatis still refers to /usr/libexec/makewhatis.local, which of course no longer exists. I'm not sure what the fix is to

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-27 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: status of npx patch |= PCB_NPXINITDONE?

2002-10-27 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Nate Lawson wrote: On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Daniel Flickinger wrote: I placed your patch for npx in my kernel builds for 25 and 26 Oct ... I have not had xemacs under X lock-up since --and it was downright regular prior. Is this the reason? Will the

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Julian Elischer wrote: Well, burncd is about to grow even more DVD support thanks to donations of HW etc from our users. As usual it will be totally open and free (as in beer)... PS: I find it somewhat amusing that the loudest speakers for atapicam and cdrecord etc all, now ask for

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Nate Lawson: You got it backwards -- is atapicam complete enough to work reliably with cdrecord? There's no reason for us to replicate a more feature-complete port in our src tree. Yes it is. gcombust + cdrecord + atapicam is prefect for that and works fine. -- Ollivier ROBERT

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Soeren Schmidt: Well, the real question here is who adds DVD capability to cdrecord ? Someone who has knowledge of how to do it ? I personally don't really care about cdrecord vs burncd (which I have used before with success when atapicam didn't exist) but one must admit that

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Ollivier Robert wrote: According to Soeren Schmidt: Well, the real question here is who adds DVD capability to cdrecord ? Someone who has knowledge of how to do it ? Thats more or less obvious isn't it ? So the question still stands: who adds DVD capability to cdrecord ? -Søren

Re: GEOM gets whole disk geometry for slice (instead of slice geometry)

2002-10-27 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrey A. Chernov writes: I have disk shared between FreeBSD and M$ Win, two slices, and got incorrect disklabel with GEOM kernel. Namely cylinders and sectors/unit fields are from _whole_ disk, not from just requested slice. Please send me output of: dd

Re: HEADSUP: burncd/cdcontrol need to be rebuilt (CDRIO*SPEED changes)

2002-10-27 Thread eculp
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Quoting Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | | SNAP | | | | | I checked again and my commit had missed the burncd speed conversion. I | | just committed it -- rev 1.28 burncd.c. Sorry about this. CVSUP, | rebuild | | burncd, and let me

Re: libfetch/http.c with -Werror

2002-10-27 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems _http_growbuf() should return int at the end of function? Yes, already mentioned in PR 44123 (and fixed a few minutes ago) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Julian Elischer
there is a set of patches for it that Ken Merry pointed out to me. http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/files/cdrtools/ however it is not complete support. Joerg Schilling has a vesion with full DVD support and it's his right to ask for money for it. I may end up buying some licences from him

Re: df problems ?

2002-10-27 Thread Dave Evans
Is there any way of obtaining a list of superblocks on a fs, apart from making a note of the list newfs produces? dumpfs(8) There is, as I've just discovered, a -N option to newfs, which displays what it is going to do but doesn't write to the disk. One slip of the typing fingers and

don't do that w/ snd_emu10k1.ko

2002-10-27 Thread Sean Kelly
When attempting to kldunload snd_emu10k1.ko, I was greeted with a panic saying don't do that. I wasn't able to get any traces or anything, as things went downhill from there. I'm not exactly sure what happened after that, but it wasn't a graceful crash to say the least. I'll try it again later for

Re: HEADSUP: burncd/cdcontrol need to be rebuilt (CDRIO*SPEED changes)

2002-10-27 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Quoting Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | | SNAP | | | | | I checked again and my commit had missed the burncd speed conversion. I | | just committed it -- rev 1.28 burncd.c. Sorry

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Nate Lawson
Ah, I didn't know about the DVD for $ issue. In any case, I prefer cdrecord because it works cross-platform and is supported by many GUIs. The problem with making burncd work for SCSI is that it doesn't use the ATAPI interface, instead it implements our own ioctl interface. Currently, the

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Soeren Schmidt wrote: Well, burncd is about to grow even more DVD support thanks to donations of HW etc from our users. As usual it will be totally open and free (as in beer)... That's always good to hear. PS: I find it somewhat amusing that the loudest speakers for

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Nate Lawson wrote: Ah, I didn't know about the DVD for $ issue. In any case, I prefer cdrecord because it works cross-platform and is supported by many GUIs. right, but cdrecord is as close to closed source as you can get without actually calling it that... The problem with making

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Nate Lawson wrote: On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Soeren Schmidt wrote: Well, burncd is about to grow even more DVD support thanks to donations of HW etc from our users. As usual it will be totally open and free (as in beer)... That's always good to hear. Right PS: I find it

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Nate Lawson wrote: I'd like it even more if the tools did away with the private ioctl interface and really did speak ATAPI. If that happened, burncd would instantly work on many SCSI cd drives. Oh, I just forgot, the ioctl interface actually came into use because the old SCSI system

softdep panic on 5.0-CURRENT

2002-10-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
I've just got the following panic on one of the package cluster machines. It is running a kernel from October 18. Is this panic already fixed? Kris panic: softdep_disk_io_initiation: read panic: from debugger Uptime: 12h45m14s Dumping 254 MB ata0: resetting devices .. done 16 32 48 64 80 96

fsck / and remount failure

2002-10-27 Thread Sean Kelly
I just suffered a kernel panic and upon reboot, I noticed that the root filesystem isn't able to be remounted read/write after the fsck: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad1s1a WARNING: / was not properly dismounted ... Starting file system checks: /dev/ad1s1a: INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=42806 (4 should

Kernel breakage?

2002-10-27 Thread Josef Karthauser
Is this me? cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_examine.c: In function `db_examine': /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_examine.c:132: warning: unknown conversion type character `y' in format /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_examine.c:132: warning: too many arguments for format

Re: fsck / and remount failure

2002-10-27 Thread Robert Watson
Are you using UFS1 extended attributes on that box? I suspect there might be a bug involving the open flags passed to extended attribute backing vnodes such that a remount is refused because there are existing vnodes opened writable. I.e., the extended attribute backing files are opened

Re: Kernel breakage?

2002-10-27 Thread Robert Watson
I think UPDATING hasn't been updated on this, but there was a change in the format printing for printf that conflicts with the ddb format printing. You need to rebuild your gcc. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates

Re: Kernel breakage?

2002-10-27 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:18:37PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: I think UPDATING hasn't been updated on this, but there was a change in the format printing for printf that conflicts with the ddb format printing. You need to rebuild your gcc. Thanks. I'll do that. I'm a bit scared of

Re: fsck / and remount failure

2002-10-27 Thread Sean Kelly
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:17:44PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: Are you using UFS1 extended attributes on that box? Yes. (290) smkelly@edgemaster:~$ grep UFS /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/EDGEMASTER options UFS_DIRHASH options UFS_EXTATTR options UFS_EXTATTR_AUTOSTART options

Re: Kernel breakage?

2002-10-27 Thread Doug Barton
Josef Karthauser wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:18:37PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: I think UPDATING hasn't been updated on this, but there was a change in the format printing for printf that conflicts with the ddb format printing. You need to rebuild your gcc. Thanks. I'll do

Re: burncd/cdcontrol

2002-10-27 Thread Terry Lambert
Nate Lawson wrote: The problem with making burncd work for SCSI is that it doesn't use the ATAPI interface, instead it implements our own ioctl interface. Currently, the ioctls burncd uses that are missing from cd(4) are: [ ... ] Instead of cutting/pasting those from atapi-cd.c, I think it

Latest fetch on current broken

2002-10-27 Thread Manfred Antar
I just did a build-install world plus new kernel with current sources as of 3pm PST Sunday the 27th fetch is broken: (src)4190}fetch -vv ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/cdrecord/alpha//cdrtools-1.11a39.tar.gz --- ftp.fokus.gmd.de:21 looking up ftp.fokus.gmd.de connecting to ftp.fokus.gmd.de:21

Re: Kernel breakage?

2002-10-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I think UPDATING hasn't been updated on this, but there was a change in : the format printing for printf that conflicts with the ddb format : printing. You need to rebuild your gcc. For dumb stuff like this, I

Current, apache(1/2): no tcp4, only tcp6

2002-10-27 Thread Leif Neland
Some time ago my not often used testserver has stopped serving port 80, tcp4, and only serves port 80, tcp6. netstat -a shows port 80 is only open on tcp6, not tcp. I have installed the most current current. I have installed a fresh Apache/2.0.43 I have tried running apache on another port

5.0-20021027-CURRENT.iso cdrom will not mount

2002-10-27 Thread John De Boskey
Hi, The last three 5.x install iso cdroms that I have created will not mount. The iso(s) boot correctly and sysinstall works fine. The disks are formated and newfs'd correctly. However, when sysinstall tries to mount the cdrom, the following error is received: Error mounting /dev/acd0c on

SMP and getty?

2002-10-27 Thread Jun Kuriyama
With latest current, I cannot reach to login prompt with SMP. Without options SMP and options APIC_IO, it works fine. But with them, system is stalled at this point: - Starting inetd. Starting cron. Starting background file system checks. Mon Oct 28 09:58:32 JST 2002 - I don't know

Interesting devfs bug

2002-10-27 Thread Sean Kelly
When playing with jail earlier, I found an interesting bug in devfs. After playing with devfs a bit more, I found that jail isn't necessary to cause the bug to show itself. Here's a copy of the session. The problem should be obvious. edgemaster# uname -a FreeBSD edgemaster.zombie.org 5.0-CURRENT

Re: Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-27 Thread Seigo Tanimura
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:51:44 -0400 (EDT), Jeff Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: jroberson I do, however, like the page unwiring idea. As long as it's not too jroberson expensive. I have been somewhat disappointed that the buffer cache's jroberson buffers are hands off for the vm. I'm

Re: Kernel breakage?

2002-10-27 Thread Julian Elischer
I got caught by this too you need to do your kernel build in a make buildkernel after doing a make buildworld, so that it uses the newly compiled compiler. should be in UPDATING. On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Josef Karthauser wrote: Is this me? cc1: warnings being treated as errors

Re: Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-27 Thread Seigo Tanimura
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:05:30 +1000 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: bde Almost exactly what we have. It turns out to be not very good, at least bde in its current implementation, since remapping is too expensive. Things bde work OK to the extent that remapping is not required, but

Re: Kernel breakage?

2002-10-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:35:30PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: I got caught by this too you need to do your kernel build in a make buildkernel after doing a make buildworld, so that it uses the newly compiled compiler. should be in UPDATING. Well, it is in UPDATING..this has been the

Re: Latest fetch on current broken

2002-10-27 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:31:27PM -0800, Manfred Antar wrote: I noticed it when doing a portupgrade cdrtools So yes anything that uses fetch is not going to work OK, I started tracing this down. Here's how to get debugging versions: cd /usr/src/lib/libfetch make clean make DEBUG_FLAGS=-g

Re: Latest fetch on current broken

2002-10-27 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 10:21:02PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:31:27PM -0800, Manfred Antar wrote: I noticed it when doing a portupgrade cdrtools So yes anything that uses fetch is not going to work OK, I started tracing this down. Here's how to get

Re: Latest fetch on current broken

2002-10-27 Thread Manfred Antar
At 10:38 PM 10/27/2002 -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 10:21:02PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:31:27PM -0800, Manfred Antar wrote: I noticed it when doing a portupgrade cdrtools So yes anything that uses fetch is not going to work OK, I

Re: Latest fetch on current broken

2002-10-27 Thread Carl Schmidt
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 10:38:36PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 10:21:02PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:31:27PM -0800, Manfred Antar wrote: I noticed it when doing a portupgrade cdrtools So yes anything that uses fetch is not going to

Large 'label'ing defaults for sysinstall

2002-10-27 Thread John De Boskey
Hi, In this day of larger disk drives, I've modified the code in sysinstall to automatically create a /home partition and increase the rest of the sizes if the size of the disk (or slice) exceeds a given size (currently 58gig in my patch). For example, using A(uto in the label editor on a

Re: Large 'label'ing defaults for sysinstall

2002-10-27 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 06:39, John De Boskey wrote: The patch is below. I left the one 'if (large)' condition to the very left to show indention while attempting to reduce whitespace diffs. A whitespace only diff can be committed posthumously. I'd like to commit this if there are no

Re: Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-27 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Seigo Tanimura wrote: On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:05:30 +1000 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: bde Almost exactly what we have. It turns out to be not very good, at least bde in its current implementation, since remapping is too expensive. Things bde work OK to