alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Mon Nov 25 01:00:10 PST 2002 ... U share/examples/Makefile ? sys/alpha/conf/LINT U sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic79xx_osm.c U sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic79xx_osm.h U sys/dev/raidframe/rf_freebsdkintf.c U sys/i386/i386/pmap.c U sys/i386/i386/vm_machdep.c U sys/kern/kern_exec.c U sys/kern/kern_exit.c cvs [update

Re: Update to UFS2 Superblock Format

2002-11-25 Thread Julian Elischer
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote: Some of these fields could usefully be made unsigned others not (for example fs_pendingblocks and fs_pendinginodes). So just going through and making everything unsigned is not the right approach. I will make a pass through and consider changing

Re: Polled mode with device.hints

2002-11-25 Thread Marc Fonvieille
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 05:37:49PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: For sio, polled mode is configured by not creating an irq resource. Leave the irq out of the device line in the config file for RELENG_4, and don''t configure a hint for the irq in 5.x. This might not actually work since PNP or ACPI

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Drehmel
Hello Philip, On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:49:34AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote: [reformatted] 2. This one's the most irritating. I use Mutt as my mailclient using Maildirs for storage. It occasionally happens that Mutt just 'hangs' reading a directory, and there's no way for me to kill

Re: installworld fail

2002-11-25 Thread Ying-Chieh Liao
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 00:06:59 +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: I'm in DP2, and cvsup and then make world... error messages if [ -L /usr/share/examples/sunrpc ]; then rm -f /usr/share/examples/sunrpc; fi if [ -L /usr/share/examples/worm ]; then rm -f /usr/share/examples/worm; fi mtree -deU

Re: Polled mode with device.hints

2002-11-25 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Marc Fonvieille wrote: [polled mode for sio0 and ppc0] But what about ppc0 ? I have to remove the IRQ line as well? (sorry I can't test now) I don't know exactly (I rarely use it). I also noted that lptcontrol(8) does not work under 4.X and 5.X. It seems that since

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2002-11-25 11:45:36 (+0100), Robert Drehmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:49:34AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote: [reformatted] 2. This one's the most irritating. I use Mutt as my mailclient using Maildirs for storage. It occasionally happens that Mutt just 'hangs'

Re: Polled mode with device.hints

2002-11-25 Thread Marc Fonvieille
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:32:46PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: [...] lptcontrol -i and lptcontrol -p work for me under -current. They presumably work because the driver sets up the interrupt for every write(2) if interrupts are enabled. This used to cause panics because a thread was created

Re: installworld fail

2002-11-25 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:04:28 +0800 From: Ying-Chieh Liao [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 00:06:59 +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: I'm in DP2, and cvsup and then make world... error messages if [ -L /usr/share/examples/sunrpc ]; then rm -f /usr/share/examples/sunrpc; fi if [ -L

-current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Mikhail Teterin
The only way to get my -current system back to normal after a crash is to boot into single user and do an explicit ``fsck -p''. Otherwise the system will, seemingly, boot fine, but none of the ttyvs will accept any input, although tty-switching works fine. Remote connections (ssh, telnet) don't

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread ianf
Philip Paeps wrote: Hi guys - I accidently upgraded my workstation to -CURRENT over the weekend (forgot a tag=RELENG_4 in my supfile and let it cook). It being a workstation and containing no critical data, I decided to just stick with it and give it a go . The machine's been running

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Mikhail Teterin wrote: The only way to get my -current system back to normal after a crash is to boot into single user and do an explicit ``fsck -p''. Otherwise the system will, seemingly, boot fine, but none of the ttyvs will accept any input, although tty-switching

Re: [Where] is OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package available?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Munish Chopra wrote: On 2002-11-25 08:30 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ But, i tried to install that package on my FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT, well it went fine, but when i try to run openoffice, i will get a Segmentation fault.

PATCH - changing libc_r to use *context()

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel Eischen
There's a patch at: http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/libc_r.diffs that changes libc_r to use *context() instead of setjmp/longjmp. There are some other changes that the -java folks have wanted for some time (signal handlers installed with SA_SIGINFO now always get a siginfo_t and

compiling kdebase3 under -CURRENT of Nov 26th fails ...

2002-11-25 Thread Marc G. Fournier
I just CVSup'd and rebuilt (and installed) world/kernel, just in case it was a transient error from last week ... but same error. I know zero about C++, but what little I know, aren't the 'undefined references' standard C++ functions? *raised eyebrows* gmake[3]: Entering directory

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: I propose that we make struct label portion of the pkthdr compile-time conditional on MAC. The assumption is that you will move the MAC label to an m_tag sometime after 5.0-RELEASE. This weekend I spent about six hours looking at what it would

Re: ACPI and apm_saver?

2002-11-25 Thread John Baldwin
On 22-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: Donn Miller wrote: ACPI works pretty well on my HP Pavilion Notebook. But is it possible to get the apm saver (apm_saver.ko) to work with ACPI? From what I understand, acpi is a superset of apm, and is able to provide some emulation of apm functionality.

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:24:46AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: I thought, this might be due to the priority of the background fsck and have once left it alone for several hours -- with no effect. The usual fsck takes a few minutes. We really need to disable background fsck if the system

Re: compiling kdebase3 under -CURRENT of Nov 26th fails ...

2002-11-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:11:44PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: I just CVSup'd and rebuilt (and installed) world/kernel, just in case it was a transient error from last week ... but same error. I know zero about C++, but what little I know, aren't the 'undefined references' standard C++

Re: installworld fail

2002-11-25 Thread Jos Backus
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 05:51:43AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: * I have never seen the failure on my SMP machine; I always (since around 09 Nov) see it on my (UP) laptop (unless I run a script in parallel with the installworld). Fwiw, I saw this failure while building world on my SMP

Re: compiling kdebase3 under -CURRENT of Nov 26th fails ...

2002-11-25 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:11:44PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: I just CVSup'd and rebuilt (and installed) world/kernel, just in case it was a transient error from last week ... but same error. I know zero about C++, but what little I know,

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:31:39AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: ... This weekend I spent about six hours looking at what it would take to move MAC label data into m_tags. While in theory it is a workable idea, it turns out our m_tag implementation is fairly far from being ready to handle

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2002-11-25 13:09:56 (+0100), Philip Paeps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2002-11-25 11:45:36 (+0100), Robert Drehmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:49:34AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote: [reformatted] 2. This one's the most irritating. I use Mutt as my mailclient using

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On Monday 25 November 2002 12:24 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: = On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:24:46AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: = = I thought, this might be due to the priority of the background = fsck and have once left it alone for several hours -- with no = effect. The usual fsck takes a few

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2002-11-25 17:23:50 (+0200), [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philip Paeps wrote: 1. When I boot my machine, it gives me the following messages: | [...] | vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 | unknown: PNP0303 can't assign

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robe rt Watson writes: On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: I propose that we make struct label portion of the pkthdr compile-time conditional on MAC. The assumption is that you will move the MAC label to an m_tag sometime after 5.0-RELEASE. I object to

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 04:23:33PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: If we're going to nitpick the mbuf system, a much, much worse problem is that you cannot allocate an mbuf chain w/o holding Giant, which stems from the mbuf system eventually calling kmem_malloc(). This effectively prevents any

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 01:33:29PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: If we're going to nitpick the mbuf system, a much, much worse problem is that you cannot allocate an mbuf chain w/o holding Giant, which stems from the mbuf system

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:31:39AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: BTW, do you have any recent large-scale measurements of packet size distribution? In local tests and measurements, the additional 20 bytes on i386 didn't bump the remaining mbuf data space sufficiently low to substantially change

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Bosko Milekic writes: On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 04:23:33PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: If we're going to nitpick the mbuf system, a much, much worse problem is that you cannot allocate an mbuf chain w/o holding Giant, which stems from the mbuf system eventually calling

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Sam Leffler
(1) When packet headers are copied using m_copy_pkthdr(), different consumers have different expectations for what the resulting semantics are for m_tag data -- some want it duplicated, others want it moved. In practice, it is only ever moved, so consumers that expect

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:31:39AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: BTW, do you have any recent large-scale measurements of packet size distribution? In local tests and measurements, the additional 20 bytes on i386 didn't bump the remaining mbuf data

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Luigi Rizzo writes: The mbuf bloat has two aspects -- first it does have some cost to initialize and reset all these extra fields (and it is bug prone -- witness is the missing cleanup in m_getcl(), because m-tags were introduced after m_getcl() and probably it was forgotten); second, a

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Sam Leffler wrote: As I explained to you; the handling of mtags mimics what was there for the aux mbufs. I did this intentionally to avoid changes that might introduce subtle problems. My intent was to cleanup this stuff after 5.0 releases by replacing the pkthdr copy

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Archie Cobbs
Mikhail Teterin wrote: The only way to get my -current system back to normal after a crash is to boot into single user and do an explicit ``fsck -p''. Otherwise the system will, seemingly, boot fine, but none of the ttyvs will accept any input, although tty-switching works fine. Remote

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Sam Leffler wrote: I don't see this problem; m_getcl appears to do the right thing. Hmm. I see the SLIST initialization there also. Maybe I'm thinking of another function, I'll have to go check. Sorry about that. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team,

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:39:02PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: ... widely used (at list now) thus failing the two main important criteria on a side note i notice my english is getting worse and worse, and i keep making mistakes as the one above. Sorry about that.

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Sam Leffler
I don't see this problem; looutput looks to do the right thing. FWIW I've passed mbufs w/ mtags through the loopback interface. This refers specifically to the following code snippet: if (m m-m_next != NULL m-m_pkthdr.len MCLBYTES) { struct mbuf *n;

Re: select.h problem / posix / patch

2002-11-25 Thread Mike Barcroft
Marc Recht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi! Following test programm [...] gives me: x.c: In function `main': x.c:9: structure has no member named `fds_bits' when compiled with: gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED=1 x.c The attached patch fixes

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:49:34AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote the words in effect of: | [...] | vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 | unknown: PNP0303 can't assign resources (port) | unknown: PNP0f13 can't assign resources (irq) | unknown: PNP0c02

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2002-11-25 14:41:22 (-0500), Hiten Pandya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:49:34AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote the words in effect of: | unknown: PNP0401 can't assign resources (port) | unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources (port) Can you try changing the hardware

Re: DP2: nfsiod

2002-11-25 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Robert Watson wrote: Note that the rpc.lockd support is still experimental in 5.0 for client-side locking, and as such, might not be good to enable by default. I notice that in the original message for this thread, there's reference to release documentation

snd_pcm module not usable ... ?

2002-11-25 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Maybe i'm missing something that i need to load, but I took the pcm device out of my kernel config, figuring that I could use the snd_pcm module ... loaded it, but still can't seem to get sound? is there something else I need to do with devfs for this, or do Ihave to compile in the pcm device?

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:27:39PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Bosko Milekic writes: On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 04:23:33PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: If we're going to nitpick the mbuf system, a much, much worse problem is that you cannot allocate an mbuf chain w/o holding Giant,

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2002-11-25 14:41:22 (-0500), Hiten Pandya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:49:34AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote the words in effect of: As I said, I'm happy to help analyse and debug these issues, but I don't know where to look :-) Can you try using `ktrace`, like

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Bosko Milekic writes: Firstly, it should be noted that the behavior of calling kmem_malloc() when its caches are empty is an old property that has been carried over from the original allocator - in other words, it is not something that I arbitrarily introduced. Certainly. I'm

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Gallatin writes: I'm not sure what you mean. The problem is that Giant inhibits scaling on SMPs and I want to get all network drivers out from under it, not just mine. Well, that is the 1' view. Once you try to move code out from under Giant you will

Re: ACPI and apm_saver?

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
John Baldwin wrote: On 22-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: Someone needs to write an acpi_saver.ko. No, they need to write a dpms_saver.ko instead. :) acpi doesn't really have the same functionality as far as screen blanking IIRC. You're right. Is it just me, or is there a lot of month old

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:24:46AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: I thought, this might be due to the priority of the background fsck and have once left it alone for several hours -- with no effect. The usual fsck takes a few minutes. We really need to disable

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Mikhail Teterin wrote: On Monday 25 November 2002 12:24 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: = On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:24:46AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: = = I thought, this might be due to the priority of the background = fsck and have once left it alone for several hours -- with no = effect.

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:46:00AM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote: I don't see this problem; looutput looks to do the right thing. FWIW I've passed mbufs w/ mtags through the loopback interface. This refers specifically to the following code snippet: if (m m-m_next != NULL

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Bosko Milekic wrote: This is not entirely true. You can allocate an mbuf chain without holding Giant if the caches are well populated - and they should be in the common/general case. You can in fact modify the allocator to just not do a kmem_malloc() if called with M_DONTWAIT, but I

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:02:14PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: I don't think this is really possible. Yeah :( If you made system dumps mandatory (or marked swap with a non-dump header in case of panic), this still would not handle the silent reboot, double panic, or single panic with disk

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Bosko Milekic wrote: [ ... packet size distribution ... ] I am equally curious about this. One of the design assumptions for mbufs and clusters, according to McKusick et al. (and I believe another text which currently escapes me) is that packets are typically either very small or

Re: about GEOM 'geoms' chain question

2002-11-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], kai ouyang writes: If we add a partition 'da0s1h' to the box, when we excute the g_attach() function, it will call redo_rank(). My viewpoint is that the 'DEV'(da0s1h) should been added between 'Sda0' and 'Mda1'. Based my understanding on 'redo_rank', this function

Re: Update to UFS2 Superblock Format

2002-11-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kirk McKusick wr ites: Some of these fields could usefully be made unsigned others not (for example fs_pendingblocks and fs_pendinginodes). Kirk, when you have a patch, mail it to me and I'll let FlexeLint loose on it. Currently it whines loudly and voluminously

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Brad Knowles
At 2:02 PM -0800 2002/11/25, Terry Lambert wrote: If you made system dumps mandatory (or marked swap with a non-dump header in case of panic), this still would not handle the silent reboot, double panic, or single panic with disk I/O trashed cases. 8-(. How about we do the safe thing,

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Philip Paeps wrote: On 2002-11-25 14:41:22 (-0500), Hiten Pandya wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:49:34AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote: | unknown: PNP0401 can't assign resources (port) | unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources (port) Can you try changing the hardware tunable,

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Well, since no one seem to have mentioned... There is a note on the TODO list that there are race conditions with truss. Perhaps mutt is freezing because you are using truss elsewhere? Philip Paeps wrote: On 2002-11-25 13:09:56 (+0100), Philip Paeps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2002-11-25

Re: snd_pcm module not usable ... ?

2002-11-25 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Marc G. Fournier wrote: Maybe i'm missing something that i need to load, but I took the pcm device out of my kernel config, figuring that I could use the snd_pcm module ... loaded it, but still can't seem to get sound? is there something else I need to do with devfs for this, or do Ihave to

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:20:39PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: I'm not sure what you mean. The problem is that Giant inhibits scaling on SMPs and I want to get all network drivers out from under it, not just mine. Requiring Giant for mbuf allocations effectivly defeats your elegant,

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Bosko Milekic wrote: [ ... memory allocator ... ] FWIW: The Sequent Dynix allocator paper has been converted, and is now available online: Experience With an Efficient Parallel Kernel Memory Allocator Paul E. McKenney, Jack Slingwine, Phil Krueger Sequent Computer

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Philip Paeps wrote: On 2002-11-25 14:41:22 (-0500), Hiten Pandya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:49:34AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote the words in effect of: | unknown: PNP0401 can't assign resources (port) | unknown: PNP0501 can't assign

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:02:14PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: I don't think this is really possible. Yeah :( If you made system dumps mandatory (or marked swap with a non-dump header in case of panic), this still would not handle the silent reboot, double panic,

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2002-11-25 14:32:27 (-0800), Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philip Paeps wrote: On 2002-11-25 14:41:22 (-0500), Hiten Pandya wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:49:34AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote: | unknown: PNP0401 can't assign resources (port) | unknown: PNP0501 can't

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Brad Knowles wrote: At 2:02 PM -0800 2002/11/25, Terry Lambert wrote: If you made system dumps mandatory (or marked swap with a non-dump header in case of panic), this still would not handle the silent reboot, double panic, or single panic with disk I/O trashed cases. 8-(.

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Marcin Dalecki wrote: I don't think this is really possible. I went looking for a generic application use CMOS are for this sort of thing a while back, and I was unable to find one. Well you should please take a look at the fast boot option of moderately modern BIOS-es. Somthing along

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Philip Paeps wrote: The maildirs issue, I won't comment on, at this time. I hope I can provide enough information for someone to solve it though :-) It would be nice to be able to read my mail 'reliably' :-) The problem is not the amount, but the type of information. You need to

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Dan Nelson wrote: Is there documentation available for this anywhere? The BIOS vendor documentation, not the Linux source code. http://www.microsoft.com/hwdev/resources/specs/simp_bios.asp http://www.microsoft.com/hwdev/resources/specs/simp_boot.asp is the best I could find; you'll

Re: Call for testers: acpica-unix-20021118.tar.gz

2002-11-25 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, the new snapshot boots fine here. However, I still get the message acpi0: AcpiGetSleepTypeData failed - AE_NOT_FOUND OK, never mind. This is normal because your DSDT doesn't have _S1_ object. Name(\_S0_, Package(0x4) { 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, }) Name(\_S3_, Package(0x4)

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2002-11-25 16:00:52 (-0800), Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philip Paeps wrote: The maildirs issue, I won't comment on, at this time. I hope I can provide enough information for someone to solve it though :-) It would be nice to be able to read my mail 'reliably' :-) The

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Marcin Dalecki
Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Nov 25), Terry Lambert said: Marcin Dalecki wrote: I don't think this is really possible. I went looking for a generic application use CMOS are for this sort of thing a while back, and I was unable to find one. Well you should please take a look at

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Bosko Milekic writes: Well, first of all, I never call kmem_malloc() with any locks held so this argument about grabbing Giant while other locks are held is not applicable in my case. Well, not for the mbuf allocator itself, but for its consumers. Given that you call the

Re: I'm impressed, but ...

2002-11-25 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Philip Paeps wrote: I was also starting to think in the NFS direction. It's one of the reasons I use Maildirs. My setup is a bit convoluted too. This machine (the one now running -current and hanging) plays NFS server. The mailserver mounts the maildir and writes

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Bosko Milekic writes: back. We'll also need a kproc that can wake up every now and then to expand the pool if allocations at interrupt time failed. Or do you already have a mechanism for that? The intended mechanism is the kproc and when the allocator was first designed

More info on blocked procs with make -j3 buildworld

2002-11-25 Thread Nate Lawson
More info. Someone should bite one of these times. So far I've got no takers so if interested, please help. I've got a box that was operational but no more procs (can't log in). It looks like the nightly 'make -j3 buildworld' hung it. I left it in ddb with hopes someone will ask the right

dc(4) problems

2002-11-25 Thread Andy Farkas
I have a Macronix 98715A network adpater that works on RELEASE-4.6-p2 but not under very recent 5.0-CURRENT (same box). Under -current the ethernet address is set to 00:00:00:00:00:00 and a warning about sleeping with a lock set is emmitted. dmesgs: FreeBSD RELEASE-4.6-p2 #0: Sun Jul 14

Re: -current unusable after a crash

2002-11-25 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Nov 25), Terry Lambert said: Marcin Dalecki wrote: I don't think this is really possible. I went looking for a generic application use CMOS are for this sort of thing a while back, and I was unable to find one. Well you should please take a look at the fast

5.0-DP2 ACLs on UFS2

2002-11-25 Thread bsd
Hey all, I've recently installed FreeBSD 5.0-DP2 to get myself familiar with the upcoming ACLs present in -CURRENT before the release itself. I've setup a test machine with one 45gb ide drive with one slice and two partitions (/ and swap) and installed FreeBSD on it. dumpfs / shows that root is

Re: More info on blocked procs with make -j3 buildworld

2002-11-25 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 5:50 PM -0800 11/25/02, Nate Lawson wrote: More info. Someone should bite one of these times. So far I've got no takers so if interested, please help. I've got a box that was operational but no more procs (can't log in). It looks like the nightly 'make -j3 buildworld' hung it. I left it

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/sound/pcm buffer.c channel.c feeder.c feeder_fmt.c feeder_rate.c sndstat.c sound.c sound.h vchan.c

2002-11-25 Thread Ray Kohler
cg 2002/11/25 09:17:43 PST Modified files: sys/dev/sound/pcmbuffer.c channel.c feeder.c feeder_fmt.c feeder_rate.c sndstat.c sound.c sound.h vchan.c Log: various fixes to eliminate locking warnings Approved by: re Reviewed by: orion I have no idea why, but

vm/uma_core.c:1330: could sleep with skc0 (was: sk (miibus) driverwon't attach...more info)

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Faulds
A little more poking around produced this... coraegis1# kldload if_sk skc0: SysKonnect Gigabit Ethernet port 0x1400-0x14ff mem 0xf400-0xf4003fff irq 3 at device 12.0 on pci0 /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1330: could sleep with skc0 locked from /usr/src/sys/pci/if_sk.c:1213 skc0: SysKonnect

ISA probe failure (ed0)

2002-11-25 Thread Fred Condo
I have a system whose ethernet card is at ISA irq 9, port 0x280, iomem 0xd8000. FreeBSD 4.7-R correctly detects and uses this card with those settings; FreeBSD 5.0-DP2 does not. Please forgive my newbosity; this is the first time I have installed -CURRENT on anything (except as a stunt).

ACPI errors - IBM Thinkpad A31p

2002-11-25 Thread Sid Carter
Hi Folks, I see this error while booting into BSD and I presume this might be the problem that acpi on my TP does not work. The errors are something like this. acpi0: IBMTP-1Gon motherboard Using $PIR table, 14 entries at 0xc00fdeb0

Re: ACPI errors - IBM Thinkpad A31p

2002-11-25 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, Are you trying this with acpica-unix-20021118 patch which was announced recently? http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/acpica-20021002-20021118-test20021121.diff Also [EMAIL PROTECTED] is better place for ACPI CA related problem reports. Thanks From: Sid Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/sound/pcm buffer.c channel.c feeder.cfeeder_fmt.c feeder_rate.c sndstat.c sound.c sound.h vchan.c

2002-11-25 Thread cameron grant
I have no idea why, but this commit broke kernel building: cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=athlon -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dev

ACLs on the boot partition?

2002-11-25 Thread bsdc
How do I enable ACLs on the boot partition? tunefs -a enable /dev/ad0s1a indicates it got set (in single user mode with / mounted readonly). But I still can't set anything with setfacl(1). I tried booting to the fixit floppy, hoping to set acls flag from there to my partition, but it doesn't have

Re: More info on blocked procs with make -j3 buildworld

2002-11-25 Thread Alan L. Cox
Does your kernel include the following? Revision 1.200 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Nov 17 09:33:00 2002 UTC (8 days, 21 hours ago) by jeff Branch: MAIN Changes since 1.199: +4 -4 lines Diff to previous 1.199 (colored) - Release the imgp vnode prior to freeing exec_map

Re: Update to UFS2 Superblock Format

2002-11-25 Thread Kirk McKusick
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 01:08:30 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kirk McKusick [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Update to UFS2 Superblock Format