5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-05-30 Thread Robert Watson
This is an automated bi-daily mailing of the FreeBSD 5.1 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.1R/todo.html Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of FreeBSD 5.1. FreeBSD 5.1

Re: [acpi-jp 2267] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree

2003-05-30 Thread Takayoshi Kochi
On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with some appropriate option. Thank you for the patch. Since we are only days away from a release, I would like to avoid using the new dynamic ID

5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-05-30 Thread Robert Watson
This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of FreeBSD 5.2. FreeBSD 5.2

Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-05-30 Thread Tim Robbins
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 10:00:13AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: |-+--+-+-| | | | | Almost all process | | | | | debugging tools

Compaq deskpro won't reboot

2003-05-30 Thread Dan Pelleg
Trying to make use of an old system - Compaq deskpro EN 350Mhz, I ran into the following problem: If you issue a reboot(8) the machine shuts down, but it never comes back. You have to hit the power button off and then back on. Otherwise the machine just sits there, screen blank. The system does

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Wesley Morgan
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Lars Eggert wrote: The machine (SMP) would sometimes freeze solid (no panic). I symlinked libc_r back to the original library, and from then on, starting gnomepanel and some other gnome pieces would fail due to errors about libthr. I couldn't find them in any log file

Re: Compaq deskpro won't reboot

2003-05-30 Thread Richard Arends
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Dan Pelleg wrote: power failure w/o waiting for the user to powercycle. Nothing seems to work. Any suggestions? Try 'shutdown -r now' Regards, Richard. Paul Vixie in an interview with Sendmail.net: Now that the Internet has the full spectrum of humanity as users,

Re: [acpi-jp 2263] HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree

2003-05-30 Thread Andrea Campi
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:06:50PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: I have committed changes to nsalloc.c and dsmethod.c. Please cvsup and test ACPI, especially if you had problems with it (that were not present before 0228 was imported). I updated and as expected my problems (that were not present

HEADS UP! [Fwd: cvs commit: www/en/releases/5.1R schedule.sgml]

2003-05-30 Thread Scott Long
All, My email on Tuesday might have been lost in the noise for many of you, so I apologize and am resending. To recap, the HEAD code freeze was extended by three days to allow for some final pending work to be committed and prepare 5.1 to be a good release. The code freeze will likely end

Re: HEADS UP! [Fwd: cvs commit: www/en/releases/5.1R schedule.sgml]

2003-05-30 Thread SoloNet Newsfeed
Scott (et. all on the RELENG team), It would have been nice that since ports was also frozen, that folks were notified in STABLE and ANNOUCE as well. I went looking through the archives trying to dig up an announcement of this, and of course, could find any. For those who rely upon CVSuping

Re: [acpi-jp 2286] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree

2003-05-30 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Andrea Campi wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:06:50PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: I have committed changes to nsalloc.c and dsmethod.c. Please cvsup and test ACPI, especially if you had problems with it (that were not present before 0228 was imported). I updated and

freebsd 5.1 beta 2 partition table corruption

2003-05-30 Thread FreeBSD_Guy
Previously I had reported a hard disk geometry problem with the freebsd installer in 5.1 beta 2. It turns out there is more to the problem. The FreeBSD installer also corrupts the partition table on the fixed disk. I did not realize this until I rebooted into Windows 98 and ran Partition

HEADS UP! Major commits in the tree coming soon

2003-05-30 Thread Thorsten Futrega
Dear users, The HEAD code freeze was extended by three days to allow for some final pending work to be committed and prepare 5.1 to be a good release. The code freeze will likely end sometime tomorrow, May 30. We ask that large scale changes still be deferred until after 5.1 is actually

Re: HEADS UP! Major commits in the tree coming soon

2003-05-30 Thread The Anarcat
On the tune of some cute Ramones song... Beat on the Troll Beat on the Troll Beat on the Troll With a baseball bat Oh yeah! Oh yeah! Oh yeah! A. On Thu May 29, 2003 at 06:18:42PM +0100, Thorsten Futrega wrote: Dear users, The HEAD code freeze was extended by three days to allow for some

Re: HEADS UP! Major commits in the tree coming soon

2003-05-30 Thread Thorsten Futrega
--- The Anarcat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the tune of some cute Ramones song... Beat on the Troll Beat on the Troll Beat on the Troll With a baseball bat Oh yeah! Oh yeah! Oh yeah! Erm, this is not really funny. I'm trying to do my job the best I can. Do you think being on core@ and

Re: HEADS UP! Major commits in the tree coming soon

2003-05-30 Thread Kenneth Culver
The HEAD code freeze was extended by three days to allow for some final pending work to be committed and prepare 5.1 to be a good release. The code freeze will likely end sometime tomorrow, May 30. We ask that large scale changes still be deferred until after 5.1 is actually released so

Re: HEADS UP! Major commits in the tree coming soon

2003-05-30 Thread Bosko Milekic
For the benefit of the majority: This post was FAKE. Now please return to your regularly scheduled discussion and kindly ignore all future posts to this thread. -Bosko On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:50:33PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: The HEAD code freeze was extended by three days to allow

5.1 Beta 2 Archive contains obsolescent base-64 headers

2003-05-30 Thread FreeBSD_Guy
FreeBSD 5.1 BETA 2 fresh install from CDROM this error happens repeatedly after new installations but intermittantly. If I make clean, then make again, different errors occur. I have tried re-installing several times. I even went so far as to suspect my power supply might be at fault because

Re: HEADS UP! Major commits in the tree coming soon

2003-05-30 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Thorsten Futrega wrote: The most important changes I'm going to commit today: - Remove gcc and replace it with a new TenDRA snapshot. - Remove GNU tar. I really don't see a need for any version of tar to be in the base system. I mean, where does it actually get used (other than things like

Re: HEADS UP! Major commits in the tree coming soon

2003-05-30 Thread Thorsten Futrega
--- Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thorsten Futrega wrote: - Remove GNU tar. I really don't see a need for any version of tar to be in the base system. I It's not needed if we have pax, and GNU tar generates broken tar files that can't be extracted with, e.g.

panic: kern/52718

2003-05-30 Thread Bryan Liesner
Is anyone going to look at this before the next release? Of course, if more info is needed, I'll send it along. No dump is available - it panics during boot. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=52718 Thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: panic: kern/52718

2003-05-30 Thread Nick H.
Just out of curosity... I had this same error a while back on one of my boxes. I ended up booting to a recovery cd and running an fsck_ffs on it and it fixed the problem. Mine would get to a login and *WHAM* it's dead. Worth a shot to see if that fixes your problem or not Regards, Nick

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Mike Makonnen
I have committed some changes to libthr today. All but one of them were bug fixes, so I encourage everyone to update their source. On Wed, 28 May 2003 22:20:19 -0700 Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Makonnen wrote: Most major locking work in libthr is finished. I believe it is

Re: panic: kern/52718

2003-05-30 Thread Julian Elischer
without the correct keywords in your mail, it's unlikely either the CAM or Mutex people would see it before then On Thu, 29 May 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote: Is anyone going to look at this before the next release? Of course, if more info is needed, I'll send it along. No dump is

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread James Tanis
How does one go about using libthr? Is all that is involved is symlinking libc_r to libthr? On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:06:52 -0400 Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have committed some changes to libthr today. All but one of them were bug fixes, so I encourage everyone to update their

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Michael Edenfield
* James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030529 17:18]: How does one go about using libthr? Is all that is involved is symlinking libc_r to libthr? That's the easiest way. You can also explicitly link applications with -lthr instead of -lc_r. And since libthr and libc_r are both 6 characters long,

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:06:52 -0400 Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From what I understand, libthr should be a drop-in replacement for libc_r, so I was surprised to see this, but maybe I misunderstood? No, you're right. The ports must have been statically linked. I'll

Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 axe.4 mac_portacl.4 my.4rndtest.4 rue.4 sbsh.4 src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 pae.4 sbni.4vpd.4

2003-05-30 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: ru 2003/05/29 14:28:36 PDT FreeBSD src repository Modified files: share/man/man4 axe.4 mac_portacl.4 my.4 rndtest.4 rue.4 sbsh.4 share/man/man4/man4.i386 pae.4 sbni.4

Re: panic: kern/52718

2003-05-30 Thread Bryan Liesner
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: without the correct keywords in your mail, it's unlikely either the CAM or Mutex people would see it before then Here's a copy of my original mail, which was pretty much ignored, with the exception of Terry Lambert. I feel that the subject was

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread John Baldwin
On 29-May-2003 Michael Edenfield wrote: * James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030529 17:18]: How does one go about using libthr? Is all that is involved is symlinking libc_r to libthr? That's the easiest way. You can also explicitly link applications with -lthr instead of -lc_r. And since

Re: panic: kern/52718

2003-05-30 Thread Bryan Liesner
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Nick H. wrote: Just out of curosity... I had this same error a while back on one of my boxes. I ended up booting to a recovery cd and running an fsck_ffs on it and it fixed the problem. Mine would get to a login and *WHAM* it's dead. Worth a shot to see if that fixes

Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 axe.4 mac_portacl.4 my.4rndtest.4 rue.4 sbsh.4 src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 pae.4 sbni.4vpd.4

2003-05-30 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 12:31:05AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: ru 2003/05/29 14:28:36 PDT FreeBSD src repository Modified files: share/man/man4 axe.4 mac_portacl.4 my.4 rndtest.4 rue.4

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Glenn Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems to be working fine on a UP machine but it locks up my SMP machine just trying to load a gnome session. It leaves an image on the screen but the keyboard and mouse stop responding and I can not ssh into the box. Same here - I get a panic in

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Glenn Johnson
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:20:02AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 00:35:32 -0500 Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The real problem is in the kernel, though. A userland non-root process should not be able to hard lock the system. One of the threads people will

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:20:02AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 00:35:32 -0500 Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The real problem is in the kernel, though. A userland non-root process should not be able to hard

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Glenn Johnson
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 03:54:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:20:02AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 00:35:32 -0500 Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The real problem is in the

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread James Tanis
On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then setup a libmap.conf. -- Alright, I compiled and installed libthr, built rtld WITH_LIBMAP, and created the libmap.conf. I am using

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Dan Nelson
( long line wrapped for readability ) In the last episode (May 29), James Tanis said: Alright, I compiled and installed libthr, built rtld WITH_LIBMAP, and created the libmap.conf. I am using the example from the man page to have all programs use the libthr library. As far as I can tell my

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Thu, 29 May 2003 18:28:26 -0400 James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then setup a libmap.conf. -- Alright, I compiled and

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 03:54:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:20:02AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 00:35:32 -0500 Dan Nelson [EMAIL

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 29 May 2003, James Tanis wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then setup a libmap.conf. -- Alright, I compiled and installed libthr, built rtld

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread James Tanis
On Thu, 29 May 2003 20:16:33 -0400 Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 18:28:26 -0400 James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to find out for sure that the programs are now using libthr? As far as I can tell they should be, but I'd like to have a

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread James Tanis
On Thu, 29 May 2003 20:16:33 -0400 Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 18:28:26 -0400 James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to find out for sure that the programs are now using libthr? As far as I can tell they should be, but I'd like to have a

Re: 5.1-BETA2 pkg_info wierdness

2003-05-30 Thread none
For anyone with backslashed +COMMENT files in /var/db/pkg, the following script can be used to clean them up. You could also wait until 5.1-RELEASE comes out, I suppose. #!/bin/tcsh cd /var/db/pkg foreach dir (`/bin/ls|/usr/bin/grep -v pkgdb.db`) echo $dir; cd $dir; /bin/ls -l +COMMENT

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Glenn Johnson
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 05:31:32PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 03:54:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:20:02AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote:

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-05-30 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-05-30 04:00:08 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-05-30 04:00:08 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-05-30 04:02:08 - building world TB --- cd

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-05-30 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-05-30 05:20:28 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-05-30 05:20:28 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-05-30 05:22:25 - building world TB --- cd

libthr vs ports/net/linuxigd

2003-05-30 Thread leafy
Using libthr for upnpd produces following backtrace when starting up #0 0x281f5b03 in _umtx_lock () from /usr/lib/libc.so.5 (gdb) backtrace #0 0x281f5b03 in _umtx_lock () from /usr/lib/libc.so.5 #1 0x280880e8 in _spinlock_pthread (pthread=0x4, lck=0x8054130) at umtx.h:62 #2 0x28088048 in

Re: libthr vs ports/net/linuxigd

2003-05-30 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Fri, 30 May 2003 15:10:37 +0800 leafy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Using libthr for upnpd produces following backtrace when starting up Are you using latest sources from about 17:00 EST 3/5/29? Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc [EMAIL PROTECTED] | D228

Re: libthr vs ports/net/linuxigd

2003-05-30 Thread leafy
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:42:52AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Fri, 30 May 2003 15:10:37 +0800 leafy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Using libthr for upnpd produces following backtrace when starting up Are you using latest sources from about 17:00 EST 3/5/29? Cheers. yes, here is CVS id

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-05-30 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-05-30 06:38:21 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-05-30 06:38:21 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-05-30 06:41:02 - building world TB --- cd

Re: 5.1-beta2 failed upgrade install

2003-05-30 Thread Masachika ISHIZUKA
--- trap 0x1, eip = 0, esp = 0xe16afd7c, ebp = 0 --- db I have still the same message for upgrade installation with 5.1-BETA-20030529-JPSNAP and 5.1-BETA-20030530-JPSNAP. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: panic: kern/52718

2003-05-30 Thread Terry Lambert
Bryan Liesner wrote: Is anyone going to look at this before the next release? Of course, if more info is needed, I'll send it along. No dump is available - it panics during boot. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=52718 This was caused by rev. 1.3 of a commit by Jeff Robertson to

Re: panic: kern/52718

2003-05-30 Thread David Xu
- Original Message - From: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bryan Liesner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 5:02 PM Subject: Re: panic: kern/52718 Bryan Liesner wrote: Is anyone going to look at this before the next release? Of course, if

Re: panic: kern/52718

2003-05-30 Thread Terry Lambert
David Xu wrote: This was caused by rev. 1.3 of a commit by Jeff Robertson to kern_utmx.c. The problem is that the proc struct is not locked for: FOREACH_THREAD_IN_PROC(td-td_proc, td0) in the lock and unlock. Either lock the proc before and unlock it after this, in both

4BSD vs ULE scheduler question

2003-05-30 Thread Matt
Just a quick question. I have been running -CURRENT since just before 5.0 was released and have seen the introduction of the ULE scheduler and the associated mails on this list about it. I know it used to be classed as very experimental and you should use 4BSD if you want stability etc. I was

Re: panic: kern/52718

2003-05-30 Thread David Xu
- Original Message - From: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: David Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Bryan Liesner [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 5:27 PM Subject: Re: panic: kern/52718 David Xu wrote: This was caused by rev. 1.3 of a commit by Jeff

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-05-30 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-05-30 09:20:29 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-05-30 09:20:29 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-05-30 09:23:20 - building world TB

swapping over nfs might be broken

2003-05-30 Thread David Yeske
I've recently set up a diskless client and I noticed something. subnet mask 255.255.255.0 router 192.168.1.2 rootfs 192.168.1.100:/export/photon.freebsd/root swapfs 192.168.1.100:/export/photon.freebsd hostname photon Adjusted interface xl0 md_lookup_swap: Swap size is 131072 KB Mounting root

full cpuspeed?

2003-05-30 Thread Sebastian Yepes [ESN]
Hi all i have a Dell inspiron 8500 Notebook that have SpeedStep when i am on AC power i just love my notebook, but when i gen on Battery i can't even see a dvd and my X run verry slow.. is there and way to force fbsd to use 'hw.acpi.cpu.current_speed=8' when i am on battery.. by the way

Re: ¿fullcpuspeed?

2003-05-30 Thread Markus Niemistö
On Fri, 30 May 2003 13:52:16 + Sebastian Yepes [ESN] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there and way to force fbsd to use 'hw.acpi.cpu.current_speed=8' when i am on battery.. by the way 'hw.acpi.cpu.current_speed' is read only.. Have you tried setting hw.acpi.cpu.economy_speed to 8? Regards,

Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 axe.4 mac_portacl.4 my.4rndtest.4rue.4 sbsh.4 src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 pae.4 sbni.4 vpd.4

2003-05-30 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Wilko Bulte wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 12:31:05AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: ru 2003/05/29 14:28:36 PDT FreeBSD src repository Modified files: share/man/man4 axe.4 mac_portacl.4 my.4 rndtest.4 rue.4

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
James Tanis wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then setup a libmap.conf. -- Alright, I compiled and installed libthr, built rtld WITH_LIBMAP, and created the libmap.conf. I am

Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 axe.4 mac_portacl.4my.4rndtest.4 rue.4 sbsh.4 src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 pae.4sbni.4 vpd.4

2003-05-30 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2003.05.30 09:21:52 -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: Wilko Bulte wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 12:31:05AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Now this is real funny: the sbsh(4) manpage says the driver first appeared in FreeBSD 4.9, but 5.1 will be released before 4.9. Something wrong with our