Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Juan Rodriguez Hervella
On Monday 07 July 2003 02:41, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Christopher Vance wrote: On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 08:14:44PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: : On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:58:19AM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote: : Myron J. Mayfield wrote: : start it. It gives me an

Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:22:02AM +0200, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote: (still waiting for FreeBSD to complete a sysinstall program that doesn't look as if it was an assignment for high-school interns). What's the matter with sysinstall ? I very much like sysinstall as it is now. :) to

Lock order reversal

2003-07-07 Thread Andrew Kolchoogin
Dear colleagues, === lock order reversal 1st 0xc2f4b128 vm object (vm object) @ vm/vm_object.c:432 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ vm/vm_kern.c:325 Stack backtrace: backtrace(c04eacec,c082f110,c04fb2fa,c04fb2fa,c04fb1a2) at backtrace+0x17 witness_lock(c082f110,8,c04fb1a2,145,c082f0b0)

Re: Lock order reversal

2003-07-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:26:43PM +0400, Andrew Kolchoogin wrote: lock order reversal 1st 0xc2f4b128 vm object (vm object) @ vm/vm_object.c:432 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ vm/vm_kern.c:325 This is known to be harmless. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Matthias Andree
Marcin Dalecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There isn't much either Solaris /proc or FresBSD /proc have in common with what Linux calls /proc. And finally on my FreeBSD box - kozaczek# mount /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, soft-updates) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) kozaczek# top And top

Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Marcin Dalecki
Matthias Andree wrote: Marcin Dalecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There isn't much either Solaris /proc or FresBSD /proc have in common with what Linux calls /proc. And finally on my FreeBSD box - kozaczek# mount /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, soft-updates) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) kozaczek#

Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:23:25PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote: You know that file system name lookup is one of the most expensive system calls under UNIX? stating the obvious is a clumsy rhetorical ploy (asking for agreement without making a point). -- Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Latest world breaks NIS users

2003-07-07 Thread Robin P. Blanchard
Just updated world/kernel to FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Mon Jul 7 07:46:48 EDT 2003 from world/kernel dated 17th June and NIS users are unable to login. # ps ax |fgrep ypbind 47087 ?? Ss 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ypbind # ypwhich DC3.gc.nat # ypcat passwd |fgrep robin

LOR in vm/swap_pager.c:1166 + vm/vm_kern.c:325

2003-07-07 Thread Peter Holm
In current from Jul 3 18:36 UTC: lock order reversal 1st 0xc0836ae4 vm object (vm object) @ vm/swap_pager.c:1166 2nd 0xc082e120 system map (system map) @ vm/vm_kern.c:325 Stack backtrace: backtrace(c050c617,c082e120,c051eacf,c051eacf,c051e977) at backtrace+0x17

Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Marcin Dalecki
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:23:25PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote: You know that file system name lookup is one of the most expensive system calls under UNIX? stating the obvious is a clumsy rhetorical ploy (asking for agreement without making a point). The point is that this

Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Matthias Andree
Marcin Dalecki schrieb am 2003-07-07: Matthias Andree wrote: Update your Linux top or run fewer processes on it then. :- You know that file system name lookup is one of the most expensive system calls under UNIX? So what? If you don't like the interface because it does ever so expensive

Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Marcin Dalecki
Matthias Andree wrote: On Mon, 07 Jul 2003, Marcin Dalecki wrote: The point is that this is one of the reasons why the top command in question takes a lot of relative CPU time under Linux. Some faster versions of procps utils try to cache data but the trade off is simply the fact that the

buildkernel ULE related breakage

2003-07-07 Thread Michal Suszko
Hi, Got this error compiling GENERIC with s/4BSD/ULE/ on recent -CURRENT ( wrapped long lines ) cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I-

Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 07), Matthias Andree said: Marcin Dalecki schrieb am 2003-07-07: Matthias Andree wrote: Update your Linux top or run fewer processes on it then. :- You know that file system name lookup is one of the most expensive system calls under UNIX? So what? If you

how to create device nodes when devfs doesn't do it?

2003-07-07 Thread Karel J. Bosschaart
Hi, After googling and searching in the mailing list archive I still can't figure out how to make device nodes in -current when devfs doesn't do this automatically. I have an external USB-drive (external 3.5 case with leftover 1.6 GB HD) from which I want to mount /dev/da0s4h. It works fine in

Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 03:35:21PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:23:25PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote: You know that file system name lookup is one of the most expensive system calls under UNIX? stating the obvious is a clumsy rhetorical

Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Harti Brandt
Hi, I'm not sure, whether this mailing list is the correct place for linux-centered discussions. Perhaps you want to continue via private mail? Regards, harti On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Dan Nelson wrote: DNIn the last episode (Jul 07), Matthias Andree said: DN Marcin Dalecki schrieb am 2003-07-07:

Re: buildkernel ULE related breakage

2003-07-07 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:20:10PM +0200, Michal Suszko wrote: Hi, Got this error compiling GENERIC with s/4BSD/ULE/ on recent -CURRENT ( wrapped long lines ) cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes

Re: how to create device nodes when devfs doesn't do it?

2003-07-07 Thread walt
Karel J. Bosschaart wrote: Hi, After googling and searching in the mailing list archive I still can't figure out how to make device nodes in -current when devfs doesn't do this automatically. I have an external USB-drive (external 3.5 case with leftover 1.6 GB HD) from which I want to mount

Re: /dev/shm

2003-07-07 Thread Matthias Andree
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003, Marcin Dalecki wrote: The point is that this is one of the reasons why the top command in question takes a lot of relative CPU time under Linux. Some faster versions of procps utils try to cache data but the trade off is simply the fact that the results are not 100%