All is good in BIND in system, except it depends on ports tree with
various options.
I have to do followed algorithm, to enable these options:
1) make and install base system
2) install needed dependencies from ports tree
3) rebuild and reinstall world
This is more complex than:
1) make and
On 7 Apr 2010, at 13:47, Eir Nym eir...@gmail.com wrote:
All is good in BIND in system, except it depends on ports tree with
various options.
WITH_BIND_XML and WITH_BIND_IDN
I have to do followed algorithm, to enable these options:
1) make and install base system
2) install needed
On 7 April 2010 05:38, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy lhm...@gmail.com wrote:
What's your mean??
See the archives for the freebsd-fs mailing list. There are two separate
groups working on getting ZFSv22 added to FreeBSD 9-CURRENT. And
Hi, All.
Some days ago i begun rewriting sade(8) to libgeom(3). Just for fun :-)
Today i have progress and you can see some screenshoots here:
http://butcher.heavennet.ru/sade/
What is done:
1. It's fully rewritten, but yes, i reuse some code from old sade.
2. I wrote small framework customdlg
In the last episode (Apr 07), krad said:
On 7 April 2010 05:38, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy lhm...@gmail.com wrote:
What's your mean??
See the archives for the freebsd-fs mailing list. There are two
separate groups working on getting
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi, All.
Some days ago i begun rewriting sade(8) to libgeom(3). Just for fun :-)
Today i have progress and you can see some screenshoots here:
http://butcher.heavennet.ru/sade/
What is done:
1. It's fully rewritten,
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 10:49:35AM -0700, Randi Harper wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi, All.
Some days ago i begun rewriting sade(8) to libgeom(3). Just for fun :-)
Today i have progress and you can see some screenshoots here:
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:26 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:26 -
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:30 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:30 -
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:33 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-04-07 18:15:33 -
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 11:24:21 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
pluknet wrote:
Hi,
the interesting part for me is how to properly assert now a value of e.g.
KINFO_PROC_SIZE varying on err.. different COMPAT_FREEBSD32 arches
(say, FreeBSD would have _kern_proc FreeBSD32 compat layer for
On 07.04.2010 21:49, Randi Harper wrote:
Wow. This is awesome. patches? :D
:)
I'm not ready yet to publish code. I planned to announce this RFC
a bit later, when code will be finished. But Konstantin (kib@) suggested
do it before finishing.
I've been working on moving sysinstall from libdisk
12 matches
Mail list logo
