Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-09-11 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote: Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org writes: 2. Imports configuration from /usr/local/etc/man.d/*.conf and /etc/man.conf (purposefully changed the manpath.config file since it is a different syntax). Hmm, and if LOCALBASE

Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-09-11 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 11.09.2010 um 09:35 schrieb Gordon Tetlow: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote: Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org writes: 2. Imports configuration from /usr/local/etc/man.d/*.conf and /etc/man.conf (purposefully changed the manpath.config file since it is

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2010-09-11 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-09-11 05:50:11 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-09-11 05:50:11 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-09-11 05:50:11 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-09-11 05:50:54 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-09-11 05:50:54 -

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-09-11 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-09-11 06:11:11 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-09-11 06:11:11 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2010-09-11 06:11:11 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-09-11 06:12:01 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-09-11 06:12:01 -

Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-09-11 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote: The order is still bogus compared to gnu man. If I don't like our ancient GNU tools and altered PATH in order to prefer ones from ports then I certainly don't want to view old manpages, too. The base manpath should be

Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-09-11 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: Feedback on the man(1), manpath(1), apropos(1), and man.conf(5) manpages would be appreciated. I'm new to manpage authoring and could use a review. you forgot the AUTHORS section in all of the man pages. ;) it's

Re: DHCP server in base

2010-09-11 Thread Aleksandr Rybalko
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:33:22 -0700 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: On 9/10/2010 1:48 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: Hi, another argument about hostapd :) if have access point we must have way to assign IP for AP clients. To start with, your assumption is wrong. DHCPd is not

Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-09-11 Thread Anonymous
Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de writes: Am 11.09.2010 um 09:35 schrieb Gordon Tetlow: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote: Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org writes: 2. Imports configuration from /usr/local/etc/man.d/*.conf and /etc/man.conf (purposefully

bonnie++ failed on locally mounted NFS

2010-09-11 Thread Tai-hwa Liang
Searching PR database for 'drastic I/O error' returns kern/33203, which seems a little bit irrelevant as there is no 'bad cookie' error in -CURRENT. cur /tmp uname -a FreeBSD cur.local.domain 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #23: Sat Aug 14 07:25:01 CST 2010

Re: DHCP server in base

2010-09-11 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:33:11PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:33:22 -0700 From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org On 9/10/2010 1:48 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: Hi, another argument about hostapd :) if have

Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-09-11 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes: PATH_MAN_SUB bin/../man PATH_MAN_SUB bin/../.man # e.g. for ~/.bin + ~/.man PATH_MAN_SUB /usr/bin/../share/man Oops, that would be non-trivial substitution. It's more like PATH_MAN_ADD bin ../man PATH_MAN_ADD .bin ../.man PATH_MAN_ADD /usr/bin

Re: g_event spinning 100% when doing 'gpart add'

2010-09-11 Thread mdf
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Yuri Pankov yuri.pan...@gmail.com wrote: Nevermind me. That's what I thought why I was getting the same gpart behavior switching between kernels, with and without DEBUG_LOCKS. Sorry about that. Same here, gpart hangs on: 3826 gpart    CALL  

Intel HD Graphics support ready?

2010-09-11 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Hi rnoland. Do you have any schedule to support Intel HD Graphics on Core i series like Clarkdale/Arrandle? I'm waiting for your patch:-). Thank you. -- Norikatsu Shigemura n...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Re: CPU C-state storange on Panasonic TOUGH BOOK CF-R9

2010-09-11 Thread Nate Lawson
Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: Hi ACPI specialists! I noticed that CPU cooling doesn't work with testing mav@'s timers_oneshot*.patch, so I got following results: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $ sysctl -a | grep cx

Experimental NFS server oddity

2010-09-11 Thread Tim Kientzle
I just tried adding nfsv4_server_enable=YES to my rc.conf and found that after I rebooted the server, my FreeBSD 8 client (still using NFSv3) couldn't connect because there was no RPC mapping for nfs. Removing the option above and rebooting the server makes it work again. Server is GENERIC

Re: about in_multi_mtx @ netinet/in_mcast.c:1095

2010-09-11 Thread Weongyo Jeong
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:17:39PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, September 10, 2010 4:28:58 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote: On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM

Re: CPU C-state storange on Panasonic TOUGH BOOK CF-R9

2010-09-11 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Hi nate. On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:30:29 -0700 Nate Lawson n...@root.org wrote: I think the issue is that C2 is not available for some reason and thus C3 can't be used either. The way to tell is to use acpidump and look for the CPU objects' _CST fields. I attached acpidump -dt

Re: Experimental NFS server oddity

2010-09-11 Thread Rick Macklem
I just tried adding nfsv4_server_enable=YES to my rc.conf and found that after I rebooted the server, my FreeBSD 8 client (still using NFSv3) couldn't connect because there was no RPC mapping for nfs. Did you specify both of these in rc.conf? nfs_server_enable=YES

Re: Experimental NFS server oddity

2010-09-11 Thread Tim Kientzle
On Sep 11, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: I just tried adding nfsv4_server_enable=YES to my rc.conf and found that after I rebooted the server, my FreeBSD 8 client (still using NFSv3) couldn't connect because there was no RPC mapping for nfs. Did you specify both of these in

ZFS v28 and sendfile()

2010-09-11 Thread Rob Farmer
Seems to not work properly, at least as implemented in the nginx web server (specifically www/nginx-devel from ports). I have sendfile on; in my nginx.conf and files served from a ZFS filesystem are garbled in seemingly random ways (their md5 changes every time). Shutting it off resolves the

Re: CPU C-state storange on Panasonic TOUGH BOOK CF-R9

2010-09-11 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 08:14:09 +0900 Norikatsu Shigemura n...@freebsd.org wrote: According to acpidump -dt, I could find CPU0CST table, but not found _CST. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Scope (\) { Name

Re: Experimental NFS server oddity

2010-09-11 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sep 11, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: I just tried adding nfsv4_server_enable=YES to my rc.conf and found that after I rebooted the server, my FreeBSD 8 client (still using NFSv3) couldn't connect because there was no RPC mapping for nfs. Did you specify both of

Re: Experimental NFS server oddity

2010-09-11 Thread Tim Kientzle
On Sep 11, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: On Sep 11, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: You can also look in /var/log/messages to see if any of the daemons are complaining about something. Only warning I see on a system reboot is: nfsd: can't open /var/db/nfs-stablerestart

Re: {arch}/conf/DEFAULTS and uart

2010-09-11 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Sep 10 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:50:45 pm Alexander Best wrote: On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote: hi there, except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in conf/DEFAULTS. is