Re: sound config problem

2010-11-24 Thread Daniel Nebdal
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:24 PM, AN a...@neu.net wrote: What is the status of sound on 9-current?  I am having a problem getting sound to work.  I have snd_hda_load=YES in /boot/loader.conf.  When I try to configure sounds in Gnome, by going to System menu - preferences - sound, a small

Re: sound config problem

2010-11-24 Thread Bruce Cran
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:27:49 +0200 Daniel Nebdal dneb...@gmail.com wrote: Just as a starter, does it work at all? That is, do you have a /dev/dsp? Do simple OSS programs work? (mpg123 is a nice minimal test; mplayer is fine.) There's always a chance of the problem being on the gnome side of

groff build failure (me too, but i386)

2010-11-24 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hi! Since nobody seems to get the error it may be my fault. Please, help if you can. Thanks! Here are some details: - [~]b...@bb% uname -a FreeBSD bb.ipt.ru 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r214737: Wed Nov 3 18:48:54 MSK 2010 r...@bb.ipt.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386

Re: groff build failure (me too, but i386)

2010-11-24 Thread Matthew Jacob
Update your tree. This was broken in fixed within the last week or so Hi! Since nobody seems to get the error it may be my fault. Please, help if you can. Thanks! Here are some details: - [~]b...@bb% uname -a FreeBSD bb.ipt.ru 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r214737: Wed Nov 3

Re: groff build failure (me too, but i386)

2010-11-24 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hi Matthew, On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:49:08 -0800 Matthew Jacob wrote: Update your tree. This was broken in fixed within the last week or so Hm, I'm not sure what did you mean, since [1] and [2]. Since nobody seems to get the error it may be my fault. Please, help if you can. Thanks!

RE: panic with devclass_get_name (dc=0xdeadc0dedeadc0de)

2010-11-24 Thread Roger Hammerstein
Thank you all for the replies. Will try ATA_CAM shortly. To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Using ATA_CAM it doesn't panic, it removes the bad disk from /dev after the problem. new dmesg and the error log on the bottom Table 'FACP' at 0x7fff0290

Re: panic with devclass_get_name (dc=0xdeadc0dedeadc0de)

2010-11-24 Thread Alexander Motin
Roger Hammerstein wrote: Using ATA_CAM it doesn't panic, it removes the bad disk from /dev after the problem. Nov 24 12:36:15 butter kernel: ata4: SATA connect time=0ms status=0113 Nov 24 12:36:15 butter kernel: ata4: reset tp1 mask=01 ostat0=d0 ostat1=00 Nov 24 12:36:15 butter kernel:

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-11-24 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-24 20:13:17 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-24 20:13:17 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-11-24 20:13:17 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-24 20:13:37 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-24 20:13:37 -

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2010-11-24 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-24 20:27:49 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-24 20:27:49 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-11-24 20:27:49 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-24 20:28:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-24 20:28:03 -

Re: groff build failure (me too, but i386)

2010-11-24 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 24.11.2010 at 19:24:48 +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: Hi Matthew, On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:49:08 -0800 Matthew Jacob wrote: Update your tree. This was broken in fixed within the last week or so Hm, I'm not sure what did you mean, since [1] and [2]. Please try: # cd

[solved] Re: groff build failure (me too, but i386)

2010-11-24 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:08:48 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote: Since nobody seems to get the error it may be my fault. Please, help if you can. Thanks! Here are some details: - [~]b...@bb% uname -a FreeBSD bb.ipt.ru 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r214737: Wed Nov 3 18:48:54 MSK 2010

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-11-24 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-24 20:10:49 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-24 20:10:49 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2010-11-24 20:10:49 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-24 20:11:13 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-24 20:11:13 -

Re: groff build failure (me too, but i386)

2010-11-24 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hi Matthew, thanks for your attention. On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:43:56 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Wed, 24.11.2010 at 19:24:48 +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:49:08 -0800 Matthew Jacob wrote: Update your tree. This was broken in fixed within the last week or so

Re: groff build failure (me too, but i386)

2010-11-24 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:52:19 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote: Hi Matthew, Matthew, Ulrich, sorry! Sure I ment Ulrich here. thanks for your attention. On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:43:56 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Wed, 24.11.2010 at 19:24:48 +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2010-11-24 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-24 22:00:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-24 22:00:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-11-24 22:00:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-24 22:00:38 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-24 22:00:38 -

Re: A big-ish machine, cannot boot

2010-11-24 Thread Ivan Voras
On 11/20/10 01:36, Ivan Voras wrote: Here's the CPU topology (correctly parsed, thankfully :) ), if someone's interested: biggie# sysctl kern.sched.topology_spec kern.sched.topology_spec: groups group level=1 cache-level=0 cpu count=24 mask=0xff0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,