On Oct 13, 2011, at 9:40 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:00 PM, wrote:
>> From: Arnaud Lacombe
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> There is many case recently when I really wished timestamp were present in
>> the
>> post-mortem msgbuf. Such situation could be when userland
on 30/08/2011 13:01 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>
> So, just to re-iterate, I think that this is indeed a regression and the one
> that could be particularly unhelpful for a new release - the time when people
> are much more likely to end up at the mountroot prompt during an installation
> o
Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote
in <4e97d9f3.4020...@gibfest.dk>:
th> On 14.10.2011 08:14, Hiroki Sato wrote:
th> > telnet www.freebsd.org 80 < /dev/null
th> [tykling@tykburk ~]$ telnet www.freebsd.org 80 < /dev/null
th> Trying 69.147.83.34...
th> Connected to red.freebsd.org.
th> Escape character
On 14-10-2011 10:09, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Thanks. There is no problem with the source address selection. The
> last questions are:
>
> % route get -inet www.freebsd.org
[tykling@tykburk ~]$ route get -inet www.freebsd.org
route to: red.freebsd.org
destination: default
mask: default
On Fri Oct 14 11, Nikolay Denev wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2011, at 9:40 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:00 PM, wrote:
> >> From: Arnaud Lacombe
> >>
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> There is many case recently when I really wished timestamp were present in
> >> th
In message <20111014085609.ga3...@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best writes:
>1) would it be possible to prepend those timestamps to the actual console
>output and not only to the output of demsg? maybe via a sysctl toggle?
The kernel does not know enough about timezones to emit anything
but UTC timest
On Fri Oct 14 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20111014085609.ga3...@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best writes:
>
> >1) would it be possible to prepend those timestamps to the actual console
> >output and not only to the output of demsg? maybe via a sysctl toggle?
>
> The kernel does not know
On Fri Oct 14 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Fri Oct 14 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <20111014085609.ga3...@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best writes:
> >
> > >1) would it be possible to prepend those timestamps to the actual console
> > >output and not only to the output of demsg? maybe
On Fri Oct 14 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Fri Oct 14 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <20111014085609.ga3...@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best writes:
> >
> > >1) would it be possible to prepend those timestamps to the actual console
> > >output and not only to the output of demsg? maybe
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:11:40PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
> > I'm still in opinion that EWOULDBLOCK and EAGAIN (which is the same
> > value on FreeBSD) should be converted to EEXIST on pidfile_open()
> > return.
>
> The historical (and documented) behavior
That's ok, a more aggressive fsck-from-a-rescue-disk strategy managed
to clean things up.
J Anderson
On 6 October 2011 15:58, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
>
>> On 5 October 2011 23:50, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>> I was about to upgrade my build VM f
On Thursday, October 13, 2011 6:26:26 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/12/2011 08:20, Michael Butler wrote:
> > SVN r226302 solves the ichwd failure to attach issue ..
>
> Still failing for me:
>
> ichwd0: on isa0
> ichwd0: unable to reserve GCS registers
> device_attach: ichwd0 attach returned 6
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
> After proposed changes it would look like this, what do you think?
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/pidfile.3.patch
Looks OK to me, but you should also remove the paragraph about EAGAIN in
the man page.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
_
Alexander Best writes:
>> On Fri Oct 14 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> > In message <20111014085609.ga3...@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best writes:
>> >
>> > >1) would it be possible to prepend those timestamps to the actual console
>> > >output and not only to the output of demsg? maybe via a sysc
On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 30/08/2011 13:01 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>
>> So, just to re-iterate, I think that this is indeed a regression and the one
>> that could be particularly unhelpful for a new release - the time when people
>> are much more likely to
on 14/10/2011 16:37 Marcel Moolenaar said the following:
>
> On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> on 30/08/2011 13:01 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>>
>>> So, just to re-iterate, I think that this is indeed a regression and the one
>>> that could be particularly unhelpful fo
That's what most people think.
Hi!
I would like to say that most freebsd users don't try CURRENT, but try
BETAs-x, RCs-x.
Why? Because most users don't like compile new kernel and world. It's
tediously.
You need to download a CURRENT snapshot iso, to install, csup, and then to
build kernel and wo
Andry Gapon wrote:
> Simple: revert to the previous behavior. If a user enters incorrect device
> name
>(i.e. root mounting fails), then return back to the prompt instead of panicing.
That should do the job.
- Arnaud
---
sys/kern/vfs_mountroot.c | 45 +++-
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Andry Gapon wrote:
>> Simple: revert to the previous behavior. If a user enters incorrect device
>> name
>>(i.e. root mounting fails), then return back to the prompt instead of
>>panicing.
> That should do the job.
>
Actually, my pr
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:55:28AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> That's what most people think.
Could be. But to the extent that it's true, I have no reason to believe
that it's a perspective that is held uniquely (or even principally) about
FreeBSD.
> Hi!
>
> I would like to say that most fre
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Nali Toja wrote:
> Alexander Best writes:
>
>>> On Fri Oct 14 11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>> > In message <20111014085609.ga3...@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best writes:
>>> >
>>> > >1) would it be possible to prepend those timestamps to the actual console
>>>
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:05 PM, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:55:28AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>> That's what most people think.
>
> Could be. But to the extent that it's true, I have no reason to believe
> that it's a perspective that is held uniquely (or even pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/14/11 04:35, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, October 13, 2011 6:26:26 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 10/12/2011 08:20, Michael Butler wrote:
>>> SVN r226302 solves the ichwd failure to attach issue ..
>>
>> Still failing for me:
>>
>> ichwd0:
Hi,
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:09:11 +0900 (JST)
> Hiroki Sato said:
hrs> Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote
hrs> in <4e97d9f3.4020...@gibfest.dk>:
th> On 14.10.2011 08:14, Hiroki Sato wrote:
hrs> th> > telnet www.freebsd.org 80 < /dev/null
th> [tykling@tykburk ~]$ telnet www.freebsd.org 80
On 10/14/2011 10:35, Xin LI wrote:
> On 10/14/11 04:35, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Thursday, October 13, 2011 6:26:26 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2011 08:20, Michael Butler wrote:
SVN r226302 solves the ichwd failure to attach issue ..
>>>
>>> Still failing for me:
>>>
>>> ichwd0: on is
On Friday, October 14, 2011 1:35:19 pm Xin LI wrote:
> On 10/14/11 04:35, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 13, 2011 6:26:26 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 10/12/2011 08:20, Michael Butler wrote:
> >>> SVN r226302 solves the ichwd failure to attach issue ..
> >>
> >> Still failing for me:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/14/11 10:58, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, October 14, 2011 1:35:19 pm Xin LI wrote:
>> On 10/14/11 04:35, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Thursday, October 13, 2011 6:26:26 pm Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/12/2011 08:20, Michael Butler wrote:
>>
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
>
> In no particular order:
It's a shame that nobody has yet picked up on this, it is a very useful
list of bugs in 9.0. Is there any chance you could log these three issues
as three separate PRs so that they don't get lost? Please tag them with
[regr
On 10/14/2011 12:03, Xin LI wrote:
>> Hmm, is your isab device behind a PCI-PCI bridge?
Me either:
isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0
isa0: on isab0
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of
I'm planning commit this -CURRENT if there an no objections.
In the current implementation, phandle is used to store a pointer to
the location inside the device tree. Since phandle_t is u32, this
will not work on 64 bit platforms. With this fix, the phandle is the
offset from the start of device
On Friday, October 14, 2011 3:03:00 pm Xin LI wrote:
> On 10/14/11 10:58, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, October 14, 2011 1:35:19 pm Xin LI wrote:
> >> On 10/14/11 04:35, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, October 13, 2011 6:26:26 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/12/2011 08:20, Michael Bu
On 10/14/2011 10:38, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> AFAIK, recent Firefox implements Happy Eyeballs. So, I suspect it
> doesn't obey RFC 3484, anymore.
My understanding is that they added it, then turned it off because it
didn't work as expected.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' ch
On 14/10/2011 19:58, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
>> > 3. PF doesn't expire state. The state table on my older host (pre
>> >OpenBSD-4.5) has the following stats:
>> >
>> >Status: Enabled for 0 days 00:37:17 Debug: Urgent
>> >State Table Total Ra
On 10/14/11 14:10, Jayachandran C. wrote:
I'm planning commit this -CURRENT if there an no objections.
In the current implementation, phandle is used to store a pointer to
the location inside the device tree. Since phandle_t is u32, this
will not work on 64 bit platforms. With this fix, the pha
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> That's what most people think.
> I think we hurry. Imo, BETA/RC period for !NEW! STABLE branch should be
> longer. Six months, for example.
> New STABLE branch is very important!
IMHO different OS releases (Unix or not) are usually at the
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
> On 10/14/11 14:10, Jayachandran C. wrote:
>>
>> I'm planning commit this -CURRENT if there an no objections.
>>
>> In the current implementation, phandle is used to store a pointer to
>> the location inside the device tree. Since phandle_
36 matches
Mail list logo
