On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion. Please consider an alternative
suffix to func. Perhaps, kbi or KBI. In other words,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:09:18AM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 11/15/11, Jeremie Le Hen jere...@le-hen.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:37:44AM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
In NetBSD has been some PaX feature [0] implemented. (ASLR, W^X
(~nxstack), mprotect restriction,
On Sunday, November 13, 2011 12:56:12 pm Stefan Esser wrote:
Am 11.11.2011 13:15, schrieb Attilio Rao:
Can you try rebuilding your kernel and modules from scratch and see if
it fixes your problem?
Sorry for the delay, but my system seems to need being turned off (S5)
for many hours (whole
Hi!
Out of the kernel headers that are installed in /usr/include/ hierracy, there
are some which include support multiple operating systems (usually FreeBSD and
other *BSD flavours).
This patch adds support to detect GNU/kFreeBSD as well. In all cases, we
match the same declarations as FreeBSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/16/11 09:27, Robert Millan wrote:
Hi!
Out of the kernel headers that are installed in /usr/include/
hierracy, there are some which include support multiple operating
systems (usually FreeBSD and other *BSD flavours).
This patch adds
TB --- 2011-11-16 15:30:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-16 15:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-11-16 15:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 15:31:04 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 15:31:04 -
2011/11/16 Xin LI delp...@delphij.net:
Just my $0.02 -- I think we should probably do it in a more
centralized place -- otherwise in case someone imported some new code,
they have to do the same defined(__FreeBSD__) ||
defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__)?
How about something like:
#if
Hey Robert,
Thanks for jumping into this. Sadly, it is a bit of a mess. Many of the
multiple BSD flavor support #ifdefs are actually quite stale by now, so they
should be cleaned up. That's not something you have to cope with, unless you
want, but it colors my first reaction :)
My second
On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/11/16 Xin LI delp...@delphij.net:
Just my $0.02 -- I think we should probably do it in a more
centralized place -- otherwise in case someone imported some new code,
they have to do the same defined(__FreeBSD__) ||
.. my suggestion (high level, fluffy) is to try to get
approval/consensus on fixing the immediate problem so things are
consistently horrible, then a second pass to make them consistently
unhorrible.
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 06:18:59PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2011-11-16 15:30:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on
freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-16 15:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-11-16 15:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-16
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 06:40:43PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
Hi,
Here is a patch that implements 64bit DMA on msk(4). If you use
msk(4) on a system that has more than 4GB memory, please try the
patch at the following URL and let me know whether it works or not.
You need latest msk(4) in
Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
I was tricked into finishing the work by Andrey Gapon, who developed
the patch to reliably stop other processors on panic. The patch
greatly improves the chances of getting dump on panic on SMP host.
I tested the patch trying to get a dump (from the
TB --- 2011-11-16 19:23:31 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-16 19:23:31 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-11-16 19:23:31 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 19:23:44 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 19:23:44 -
TB --- 2011-11-16 18:54:30 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-16 18:54:30 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-11-16 18:54:30 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 18:54:55 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 18:54:55 -
on 16/11/2011 21:27 Fabian Keil said the following:
Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
I was tricked into finishing the work by Andrey Gapon, who developed
the patch to reliably stop other processors on panic. The patch
greatly improves the chances of getting dump on panic on SMP
hello,
would anyone object to the following ahci(4) patch?
==
--- ahci.c.orig 2011-11-16 21:35:26.0 +
+++ ahci.c 2011-11-16 21:35:41.0 +
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@
for (unit = 0; unit ctlr-channels; unit++) {
if ((ctlr-ichannels (1 unit)) == 0)
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:27 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:27 -
Hi.
On 16.11.2011 23:59, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
would anyone object to the following ahci(4) patch?
==
--- ahci.c.orig 2011-11-16 21:35:26.0 +
+++ ahci.c 2011-11-16 21:35:41.0 +
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@
for (unit = 0; unit ctlr-channels; unit++) {
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi.
On 16.11.2011 23:59, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
would anyone object to the following ahci(4) patch?
==
--- ahci.c.orig 2011-11-16 21:35:26.0 +
+++ ahci.c 2011-11-16 21:35:41.0 +
@@
On 17.11.2011 00:44, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16.11.2011 23:59, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
would anyone object to the following ahci(4) patch?
==
--- ahci.c.orig 2011-11-16 21:35:26.0 +
+++ ahci.c
On 17.11.2011 00:21, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 16/11/2011 21:27 Fabian Keil said the following:
Kostik Belousovkostik...@gmail.com wrote:
I was tricked into finishing the work by Andrey Gapon, who developed
the patch to reliably stop other processors on panic. The patch
greatly improves the
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 17.11.2011 00:44, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16.11.2011 23:59, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
would anyone object to the following ahci(4) patch?
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:23 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:23 -
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:43 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 20:50:43 -
TB --- 2011-11-16 22:33:50 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-16 22:33:50 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-11-16 22:33:50 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 22:34:03 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 22:34:03 -
TB --- 2011-11-17 00:22:26 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-17 00:22:26 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-11-17 00:22:26 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 00:22:35 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 00:22:35 -
TB --- 2011-11-16 23:32:18 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-16 23:32:18 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-11-16 23:32:18 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 23:32:32 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-16 23:32:32 -
TB --- 2011-11-17 00:14:43 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-17 00:14:43 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-11-17 00:14:43 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 00:15:00 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 00:15:00 -
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:21 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:21 -
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:19 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:19 -
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:20 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 02:10:20 -
TB --- 2011-11-17 03:56:15 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-17 03:56:15 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-11-17 03:56:15 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 03:56:29 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 03:56:29 -
2011/11/16 Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com:
My second reaction was why not have
#ifndef __FreeBSD_kernel__
#define __FreeBSD_kernel__ __FreeBSD__
#endif
in sys/param.h and then just change __FreeBSD__ to __FreeBSD_kernel__ in the
headers that are affected? But I'm not quite sure what effects
TB --- 2011-11-17 04:48:03 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-17 04:48:03 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-11-17 04:48:03 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 04:48:15 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 04:48:15 -
TB --- 2011-11-17 05:44:08 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-17 05:44:08 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-11-17 05:44:08 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 05:44:19 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 05:44:19 -
TB --- 2011-11-17 05:36:49 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-17 05:36:49 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-11-17 05:36:49 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 05:37:15 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-17 05:37:15 -
37 matches
Mail list logo