On 01/12/2011 00:35, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/12/2011 01:27 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:07 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following:
Using new
On 01.12.2011 00:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following:
Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here.
Can't help with patch, stuck with pre Nov 15 CURRENT myself.
on 27/11/2011
On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch freebsd-curr...@dino.sk wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300
Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov m...@mxcrypt.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov
pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch freebsd-curr...@dino.sk wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300
Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov m...@mxcrypt.com wrote:
On Tue,
On 1 December 2011 13:17, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch freebsd-curr...@dino.sk wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300
Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29
Sevan,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Sevan / Venture37 ventur...@gmail.comwrote:
On 30/11/2011 16:03, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
system breaks if you try to add dtrace support to a system built with
profile support.
sorry, I meant *without* profile support.
Are you sure you mean profile
pfctl -v -s nat
rdr inet6 proto tcp from any to 2001:49f0:4004::/48 port = 9191 -
:::67.159.46.238
[ Evaluations: 512 Packets: 3 Bytes: 228 States: 1
]
[ Inserted: uid 0 pid 80940 State Creations: 2 ]
I can see here that after i tried on another host to
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 11:24:39 Thomas Mueller wrote:
According to ugen man page, ugen can be compiled into the kernel with
device ugen
in config file.
I tried that in the kernel config when upgrading from FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 to
RC2, but the kernel build stopped quickly with the
is there a chance to change cp's behaviour in connection with the -R switch, so
that it stops after the first error? i just ran into the following situation:
1) cp -ai bla /mnt/umass
2) i got a lot of warnings that /mnt/umass was full
3) cp -an bla /mnt/umass
4) ...that didn't work, since cp
On 1 December 2011 10:44, Max Khon f...@samodelkin.net wrote:
Are you sure you mean profile support and not CTF data?
Hi Max,
I mean profile support.
Havent tested on 9.0, but definitely the case with prior versions.
Will try repeat the process report back if this is not a common
occurrence
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:41:25 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 13:43:20 Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multiple
openable device, that mean that it will allow to open /dev/devctl in
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:15:11 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM,
Hi,
on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r228176M: Thu Dec 1 13:56:02 CET 2011
(GENERIC + CAPABILITIES + netmap with head.diff and bge patches applied)
I get these lock order reversals when running a netmap-enabled program
(details in the attachment) with syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF64, sys_ioctl):
Dec 1
On Thursday 01 December 2011 03:37 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On 01.12.2011 00:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following:
Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here.
Can't
On Thursday 01 December 2011 11:44:13 Thomas Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 11:24:39 Thomas Mueller wrote:
According to ugen man page, ugen can be compiled into the kernel with
device ugen
in config file.
I tried that in the kernel config when upgrading from FreeBSD
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:44:24PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
Hi,
on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r228176M: Thu Dec 1 13:56:02 CET 2011
(GENERIC + CAPABILITIES + netmap with head.diff and bge patches applied)
I get these lock order reversals when running a netmap-enabled program
(details in the
[cc list trimmed]
on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following:
On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/11/2011 23:38 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:35:07 pm John Baldwin wrote:
Hmmm, you could also make critical_exit() not
So, now that you've improved the default diagnostic output of make, how
about the OP's original request:
make -s truly silent by removing unnecessary diagnostic messages when -s
is used? :)
[Thought I'd bring the thread back around to it's original purpose.]
--
Freddie Cash
fjwc...@gmail.com
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 15:55 -0800, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:40 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/12/2011 01:22 Sean Bruno said the following:
I have a Shuttle based intel box that appears to have some pretty
bad ACPI implementation. Is there a good way to quiesce
Garrett,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
What I really want is this:
$ cat Makefile
all: foo bar baz yadda
foo bar yadda:
baz:
false
$ gmake
false
gmake: *** [baz] Error 1
$ make all
false
*** Error
I'm looking to start testing 10 on my own.
I went to: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/
Last update was 201107
Where do I get the Current snapshot of 10. (Or do I upgrade from 9.0-RC2)?
Thanks
--
Ben Adams
http://www.SpryMed.com/
___
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:54:44PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:44:24PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
Hi,
on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r228176M: Thu Dec 1 13:56:02 CET 2011
(GENERIC + CAPABILITIES + netmap with head.diff and bge patches applied)
I get these lock order
I've noted that this morning's svn update seems to be breaking pretty
badly. Is this related to the DTRACE conf changes?
[seanb@sbpi386 ~/head/sys/modules/firewire]$ make
=== firewire (all)
/usr/home/seanb/head/sys/modules/firewire/firewire/../../../conf/kmod.mk,
line 204: Malformed conditional
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:59:10 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
[cc list trimmed]
on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following:
On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/11/2011 23:38 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:35:07
On Dec 1, 2011, at 10:46 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
I've noted that this morning's svn update seems to be breaking pretty
badly. Is this related to the DTRACE conf changes?
[seanb@sbpi386 ~/head/sys/modules/firewire]$ make
=== firewire (all)
Hi everyone,
From my understanding as of 20110424 revision device ahci has been
integrated into kernel:
It is possible to load devices ahci, ata, siis and mvs as modules, but
option ATA_CAM should remain in kernel configuration to make ata
module work as CAM driver supporting
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
implement a new -N switch or so which isn't based on a file's existance, but a
file's checksum.
You can always use net/rsync, which does by default compare checksums.
--
Matt Mullins
Hello
One example is Google's tcmalloc [1], is this behaviour intended?
[1]
http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/source/browse/trunk/src/maybe_threads.cc
Regards,
George
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
on 01/12/2011 20:49 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:59:10 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
[cc list trimmed]
on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following:
On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/11/2011 23:38 John Baldwin said the
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:42:24 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/12/2011 20:49 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:59:10 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
[cc list trimmed]
on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following:
On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011, George Liaskos wrote:
Hello
One example is Google's tcmalloc [1], is this behaviour intended?
[1]
http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/source/browse/trunk/src/maybe_threads.cc
This code uses an unportable workaround for a bug that I believe
was fixed in
on 01/12/2011 22:53 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:42:24 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
Returning to critical_exit, what do you think about the following patch?
I guess that it could be committed independently of / before the
SCHEDULER_STOPPED thing.
commit
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
So, now that you've improved the default diagnostic output of make, how
about the OP's original request:
make -s truly silent by removing unnecessary diagnostic messages when -s
is used? :)
[Thought I'd bring the
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:04:50PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
I wonder why the waiting_threads stuff is needed at all. The cv could
be woken up unconditionally everytime. What is the reason for the
cv_wait
call
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:31:18 +0200
George Kontostanos gkontos.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
From my understanding as of 20110424 revision device ahci has been
integrated into kernel:
It is possible to load devices ahci, ata, siis and mvs as modules, but
option
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 14/11/2011 02:38 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
you (committers)
I wonder how it would work out if you were made a committer and couldn't say
you (committers) any more... :-)
The real question is rather whether
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:59:33PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org
wrote:
? ? pmake sucks as far as
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:04:08AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
I think this is useful, perhaps send it to harti@ or jilles@ for review?
I'd like to get some NetBSD bmake maintainers POV too.
We should reduce the needless diversion between the two makes.
--
-- David (obr...@freebsd.org)
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:35:50AM -0800, Matt Mullins wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
implement a new -N switch or so which isn't based on a file's
existance, but a file's checksum.
You can always use net/rsync, which does by default
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:08 PM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:04:08AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
I think this is useful, perhaps send it to harti@ or jilles@ for review?
I'd like to get some NetBSD bmake maintainers POV too.
We should reduce the needless
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:46:30PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
This is a separate issue that I want to handle separately.
I see no value in handling it separately. I either have a libreadline on
my system or I don't.
Again, what problem are you trying to solve?
The question is what to do with gdb
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:46:17PM +, Max Khon wrote:
Author: fjoe
Date: Tue Nov 29 19:46:17 2011
New Revision: 228143
URL:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb friends with libedit
after r228114.
The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
1) just build link gdb with libedit
OR
2) re-import libreadline from gdb sources and build
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:55:37PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb friends with libedit
after r228114.
The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
1) just build link gdb
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Matt Mullins mokom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
implement a new -N switch or so which isn't based on a file's existance, but
a
file's checksum.
You can always use net/rsync, which does by
On 12/1/11 4:42 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/12/2011 22:53 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:42:24 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
Returning to critical_exit, what do you think about the following patch?
I guess that it could be committed independently of / before the
Brooks,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote:
What is the value in doing either?
libreadline isn't infecting any non-GPL code turning into GPLv2.
Some of use have fancy .input files, and quite frankly the vi mode of
libedit still doesn't work quite the
On 2 December 2011 09:51, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Wow, a single day of discussion in freebsd-current@ was sufficient to
invert a 17 year default.
I'd like to see the profile libs remain built by default in -CURRENT.
If you like, add it to the list of things to disable on
David,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:59 AM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is a separate issue that I want to handle separately.
I see no value in handling it separately. I either have a libreadline on
my system or I don't.
What I meant is that this problem is not related to the
David,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:51 AM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:46:17PM +, Max Khon wrote:
Author: fjoe
Date:
David,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote:
If you go with (2) above, we'll still have *tons* of ports that want a
libreadline, so we'll just end up growing a port of it and we'll wind up
with a libreadline on the system anyway.
Then you need to define what
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:51:33PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:46:17PM +, Max Khon wrote:
Author: fjoe
Date: Tue Nov 29
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:41:00PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 2 December 2011 09:51, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Wow, a single day of discussion in freebsd-current@ was sufficient to
invert a 17 year default.
I'd like to see the profile libs remain built by default in
Steve,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:51:33PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default.
Opinions?
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:56:31AM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
David,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:51 AM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions?
On Tue, Nov 29,
On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote:
Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static
and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their
code when someone changes a library and that change causes
a dramatic change in the performance of one's code.
And as Max pointed
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 08:01:37PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
and last: upgrade flex to the latest upstream version (it will need the m4
upgrade) while here I'll move back flex to contrib/
patches can be found there:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/flex-update.diff
Hi Baptiste,
I
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:59:59PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote:
Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static
and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their
code when someone changes a library and that change causes
a
On 12/01/2011 23:23, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:59:59PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote:
Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static
and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their
code when someone changes a
Quick! Martinis for all conversation participants, stat!
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
60 matches
Mail list logo