TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:31 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:31 -
On 12/11/11 01:11, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 12/10/11 14:51, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Saturday, December 10, 2011 7:35:27 AM Chuck Burns wrote:
Here is quick, hackish patch to allow your make update to work, it
appears
that the Makefile.inc1 does not
On 12/11/11 00:50, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
[-questions to bcc]
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 12/07/11 07:11, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 05:56:31AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
config.status: creating ada/Makefile
config.status: creating auto-host.h
config.status:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
You wrote 9 декабря 2011 г., 14:10:18:
Soekris (famous developer of small x86-compatible appliance-like
hardware) released net6501 some time ago, which is based on Atom (E6xx)
CPU.
It seems, that 64-bit version of Linux could run on it without
problems.
But
On Dec 11, 2011, at 12:09 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on
freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 05:20:31 -
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:25 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:25 -
Hi,
Reference:
From: Maksim Yevmenkin maksim.yevmen...@gmail.com
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
Hello,
i have a question for fs wizards.
There is a list for them:
freebsd...@freebsd.org
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:33 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 10:50:33 -
Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/02/2011 04:35, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I think you're missing the point a little.
The point is, you have to keep in mind how comfortable people feel
about things, and progress sometimes makes people uncomfortable. I
think you should leave these changes bake for a
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:03 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
I use CVS (or rather csup) to keep the base system up to date. I would
be perfectly okay with using a different utility - however, I would
strongly prefer that this utility was included in the base system.
CVS != csup.
I
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi Daniel;
--- On Sat, 12/3/11, Daniel Eischen deisc...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
I would love to mirror the SVN repo in the same way
and have an 'svn' in base, or at least something that
could replace CVS in the above scenario.
I have to say I am surprised
--- Dom 11/12/11, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com ha scritto:
...
I have to say I am surprised by all the people that
still use CVS (for their own good reasons).
It still would be helpful if cvs users could evaluate
OpenCVS: it's been experimental for ages now. It does
seem to have
On 2011-12-09 10:10:18, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Soekris (famous developer of small x86-compatible appliance-like
hardware) released *net6501* some time ago, which is based on Atom (E6xx)
CPU. It seems, that 64-bit version of Linux could run on it without
problems.
But
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 05:42:01PM -0800, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
Hello,
i have a question for fs wizards.
suppose i can persuade modern spinning disk to do large reads (say
512K to 1M) at a time. also, suppose file system on such modern
spinning drive is used to store large files (tens
On 12/11/11 08:39, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi Daniel;
--- On Sat, 12/3/11, Daniel Eischendeisc...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
I would love to mirror the SVN repo in the same way
and have an 'svn' in base, or at least something that
could replace CVS in the above scenario.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/12/2011 14:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:03 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
I use CVS (or rather csup) to keep the base system up to date.
I would be perfectly okay with using a different utility -
however, I would
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:21 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:21 -
on 11/12/2011 11:27 Lev Serebryakov said the following:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
You wrote 9 декабря 2011 г., 14:10:18:
Soekris (famous developer of small x86-compatible appliance-like
hardware) released net6501 some time ago, which is based on Atom (E6xx)
CPU.
It seems, that 64-bit
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:27 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 16:30:27 -
--- Dom 11/12/11, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com ha scritto:
If you wanted to get responses from experts only, sorry in
advance.
I am no fs expert but just thought I'd mention some things
based on my playing with the BSD ext2fs ...
The fs (AKA UFS) uses clustering provided by the
On Dec 11, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 11/12/2011 11:27 Lev Serebryakov said the following:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
You wrote 9 декабря 2011 г., 14:10:18:
Soekris (famous developer of small x86-compatible appliance-like
hardware) released net6501 some time
Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 11 декабря 2011 г., 23:12:34:
Is it true? Is it possible to have FreeBSD/amd64 without ACPI?
It seems, that device mptable in kernel config helps.
Why is it not in GENERIC kernel?
Just a guess, maybe because GENERIC kernel is for generic hardware.
Oh, yes, and
on 11/12/2011 23:12 Lev Serebryakov said the following:
Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 11 декабря 2011 г., 23:12:34:
Is it true? Is it possible to have FreeBSD/amd64 without ACPI?
It seems, that device mptable in kernel config helps.
Why is it not in GENERIC kernel?
Just a guess, maybe
There are a few cases when the kernel needs to interact with a user via syscons.
This is the cases where the kernel not only spews some output but also expects
some input. Some examples are:
- asking for a root filesystem specification
- entering ddb
- asking to press a key for reboot
In this
2011/12/11 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org
There are a few cases when the kernel needs to interact with a user via
syscons.
This is the cases where the kernel not only spews some output but also
expects
some input. Some examples are:
- asking for a root filesystem specification
- entering
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:24 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:24 -
--- On Sat, 12/10/11, Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
I'm not sure what CAM IOCTL number change others
are
referring to but
you certainly need to rebuild libcam consumers
after
r225950, which
was merged to stable/9 in r226067 on October 6
2011.
Marius
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:30 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-11 22:10:30 -
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:25 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:25 -
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:31 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-12-12 03:40:31 -
FWIW, it should be easy to ship a config file for that soekris, which
just does:
include GENERIC
device mptable
It may be worthwhile at least considering this (along with a couple of
comments explaining why the default kernel doesn't work on the soekris
board) for 9.0.
Question: can you load
on 12/12/2011 00:06 Alexander Yerenkow said the following:
2011/12/11 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org mailto:a...@freebsd.org
There are a few cases when the kernel needs to interact with a user via
syscons.
This is the cases where the kernel not only spews some output but also
32 matches
Mail list logo
