Re: CD Access in 9.x and -CURRENT

2011-12-30 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:23:22 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > Just to clarify some things that I passed on to Joseph in haste ... > > On 12/28/2011 21:56, Joseph S. Atkinson wrote: > > Doug Barton reports that cdcontrol(1) doesn't work for him, > > Some of the functions work, but I can't play audio C

Re: CD Access in 9.x and -CURRENT

2011-12-30 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/30/2011 00:53, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > I'm running 10.0-CURRENT r228926 and have no problem watching DVDs with > vlc Completely different category of access. DVDs work for me too. -- You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra Breadth of IT experience, and dept

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-30 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 04:04:31PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > There maybe serious reasons having the Linuxulator, i do not know. But > if not, why spending rare developer resources on that? This is a classical misunderstanding of the FreeBSD development model. There is no "staff" standing around

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-30 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2011-Dec-24 15:49:00 +0100, "O. Hartmann" wrote: >On 12/23/11 12:38, Daniel Kalchev wrote: >> Here is now it works: >> >> If you see an problem and have a solution: go fix it. Many will be >> grateful. >> If you can't fix it, but have an idea how to fix it, share it. May will >> be grateful.

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-12-30 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-12-30 09:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-12-30 09:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-12-30 09:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-12-30 09:40:33 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-12-30 09:40:33 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-30 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 12/30/11 10:07, schrieb Mark Linimon: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 04:04:31PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: >> There maybe serious reasons having the Linuxulator, i do not know. But >> if not, why spending rare developer resources on that? > > This is a classical misunderstanding of the FreeBSD develo

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-30 Thread Chris Rees
On 23 Dec 2011 12:25, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > Look at Steve Kargls problem. He investigated a SCHED_ULE problem in a > way that is far beyond enough! He gave tests, insights of his setup, bad > performance compared to SCHED_4BSD and what happend? We are still stuck > with this problem and more an

Re: [rfc] removing/conditionalising WERROR= in Makefiles

2011-12-30 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2011-12-26 11:10, Alexander Best wrote: that's why i'd like to propose the following patch. i ran a full tinderbox run against r228878 and it suceeded. Did you also try this with clang? For example the xfs module alone gets a whole slew of warnings, which would be fatal if WERROR= was remov

Re: [rfc] removing/conditionalising WERROR= in Makefiles

2011-12-30 Thread Chuck Burns
On 12/30/2011 7:06 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2011-12-26 11:10, Alexander Best wrote: that's why i'd like to propose the following patch. i ran a full tinderbox run against r228878 and it suceeded. Did you also try this with clang? For example the xfs module alone gets a whole slew of warnin

Re: CD Access in 9.x and -CURRENT

2011-12-30 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Thursday 29 December 2011 12:52:39 Claude Buisson wrote: > On 12/29/2011 07:41, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Joseph S. Atkinson wrote: >>> I am the maintainer of VLC, I have an outstanding PR (ports/162190) on the >>> issue of cdda:// access. >>> >>> I can confirm t

Re: [rfc] removing/conditionalising WERROR= in Makefiles

2011-12-30 Thread David Chisnall
On 30 Dec 2011, at 13:06, Dimitry Andric wrote: > sys/gnu/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_block.c:1149:17: warning: array index of '1' indexes > past the end of an array (that contains 1 element) [-Warray-bounds] I recall some discussion of this warning on the clang list a few months ago, and I believe that i

Re: CD Access in 9.x and -CURRENT

2011-12-30 Thread Claude Buisson
On 12/30/2011 14:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Thursday 29 December 2011 12:52:39 Claude Buisson wrote: On 12/29/2011 07:41, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Joseph S. Atkinson wrote: I am the maintainer of VLC, I have an outstanding PR (ports/162190) on the issue of cdd

Re: About FreeBSD 9.0 release note

2011-12-30 Thread Hideki Yamamoto
Hi all; I happen to find the 9.0-Current release notes page, but I could not find my requested text there. Are there another text for 9.0-RELEASE? http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/relnotes/index.html If yes, would someone please inform me of the URL? Best regards, Hideki Yamamoto 201

Re: [rfc] removing/conditionalising WERROR= in Makefiles

2011-12-30 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2011-12-30 14:28, David Chisnall wrote: On 30 Dec 2011, at 13:06, Dimitry Andric wrote: sys/gnu/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_block.c:1149:17: warning: array index of '1' indexes past the end of an array (that contains 1 element) [-Warray-bounds] I recall some discussion of this warning on the clang

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-12-30 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-12-30 17:00:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-12-30 17:00:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-12-30 17:00:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-12-30 17:00:25 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-12-30 17:00:25 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: CD Access in 9.x and -CURRENT

2011-12-30 Thread Joseph S. Atkinson
On 12/30/2011 08:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Thursday 29 December 2011 12:52:39 Claude Buisson wrote: >> On 12/29/2011 07:41, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Joseph S. Atkinson >>> wrote: I am the maintainer of VLC, I have an outstanding PR (ports/162190) on the

Re: Removal of sysinstall from HEAD and lack of a post-install configuration tool

2011-12-30 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 12/29/11 14:04, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, December 29, 2011 2:55:10 pm Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 12/29/11 10:52, Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, John Baldwin wrote: A way to select from available partition types (UFS, boot, swap, ZFS, etc.) rather than requiring the user to