On 09/01/2012 23:01, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> As rebuilding the repo database is something you'ld do routinely anyhow
> as part of normal maintenance
Errr ... what? Why would this be true? Doesn't pkg keep the repo
database up to date as it's making changes?
--
I am only one, but I am one.
On 09/01/2012 12:59, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Again, this is part of the reason why I suggested multiple release
> trains. Although it's more painful for bapt@, et all, it's ultimately
> what would need to be done in order for pkgng to be packaged with a
> release or set of releases.
Garrett,
On 08/30/2012 09:16, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> [Note that linking GPL-contaminated code into your
> kernel proper is, shall we say, "ideologically impure" ;-) But that is
> not the issue here.]
Can you keep this kind of stuff to -chat please? The more we deal with
the technical aspects the better o
On 02/09/2012 08:16, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 09/01/2012 23:01, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> As rebuilding the repo database is something you'ld do routinely anyhow
>> as part of normal maintenance
>
> Errr ... what? Why would this be true? Doesn't pkg keep the repo
> database up to date as it's making
It is relatively well known that Ivy Bridge CPUs (Core iX 3XXX) have
built-in hardware random number generator, which is claimed to be both
very fast and high quality. Generator is accessible using non-privileged
RDRAND instruction. It is claimed that CPU performs sanitization of the
random sequenc
01.09.2012 18:42, Kurt Jaeger пишет:
Hi!
Please file a PR against rc ASAP.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/117711
Looks like Matteo Riondato had created a patch for the problem in 2008:
http://people.freebsd.org/~matteo/diff/117711rpcbind.diff
but he never received
