I think you're supposed to be automatically sent to the mirror that is
closest to you - for some value of "closest". If the mirror you're
getting has issues, that might show up like this. Could you post the
output of "traceroute ftp.freebsd.org" ? It should show which mirror
you're getting, and per
On 27.02.13 12:23, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
I think you're supposed to be automatically sent to the mirror that is
closest to you - for some value of "closest". If the mirror you're
getting has issues, that might show up like this. Could you post the
output of "traceroute ftp.freebsd.org" ? It shou
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 27.02.13 12:23, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>>
>> I think you're supposed to be automatically sent to the mirror that is
>> closest to you - for some value of "closest". If the mirror you're
>> getting has issues, that might show up like th
27.02.2013, 08:40, "Mehmet Erol Sanliturk" :
The response of pkg_add is "Address could not be found."
Access to *.freebsd.org sites are so slow that many times, web
browsers
Firefox , Chromium are displaying a message to tell :
"Site is not found ... Try once more ..."
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Dear All ,
I have installed
https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/amd64-amd64/10.0-HEAD-r247266-JPSNAP
with a very nice steps flow and it has booted very well .
During
pkg_add -rv xorg
it become necessary to try many times , and for other packages the action
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:52:29 -0600, wrote:
Well I am in cleveland ohio usa and I have noticed that
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/ is slow or in most cases just times
out. So this is bigger problem that some mirror being down in turkey.
It started about 10 days ago.
I can't reproduce th
Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:52:29 -0600, wrote:
Well I am in cleveland ohio usa and I have noticed that
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/ is slow or in most cases just times
out. So this is bigger problem that some mirror being down in turkey.
It started about 10 days ago.
I
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:13:27 -0600, wrote:
traceroute www.freebsd.org
Here's mine going to the same destination without issue.
# traceroute www.freebsd.org
traceroute to wfe0.ysv.freebsd.org (8.8.178.110), 64 hops max, 52 byte
packets
1 192.168.93.1 (192.168.93.1) 0.494 ms 0.472 ms 0
Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:13:27 -0600, wrote:
traceroute www.freebsd.org
Here's mine going to the same destination without issue.
# traceroute www.freebsd.org
traceroute to wfe0.ysv.freebsd.org (8.8.178.110), 64 hops max, 52 byte
packets
1 192.168.93.1 (192.168.93.1) 0.
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:39:40 -0600, wrote:
Lets change the test from traceroute to pointing your browser at
www.freebsd.org and see what your response time is if at all.
Screenshots showing latency via Chromium's developer tools:
http://i.imgur.com/DaSNc6b.png
http://i.imgur.com/pvXEGgo
On 27.02.13 15:13, Fbsd8 wrote:
Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:52:29 -0600, wrote:
Well I am in cleveland ohio usa and I have noticed that
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/ is slow or in most cases just
times out. So this is bigger problem that some mirror being down in
turkey.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> I think you're supposed to be automatically sent to the mirror that is
> closest to you - for some value of "closest". If the mirror you're
> getting has issues, that might show up like this. Could you post the
> output of "traceroute ftp.fr
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 27.02.13 12:23, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>
>> I think you're supposed to be automatically sent to the mirror that is
>> closest to you - for some value of "closest". If the mirror you're
>> getting has issues, that might show up like thi
Ok, that's weird. What does a simple "nslookup ftp.freebsd.org" give you?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 27.02.13 12:23, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>>
>>> I think you're supposed to be automatically s
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> Ok, that's weird. What does a simple "nslookup ftp.freebsd.org" give you?
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Daniel Kalchev
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 27.02.13 12:23
Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:39:40 -0600, wrote:
Lets change the test from traceroute to pointing your browser at
www.freebsd.org and see what your response time is if at all.
Screenshots showing latency via Chromium's developer tools:
http://i.imgur.com/DaSNc6b.png
http://
Recently, I've posted several build errors that only I seemed to run into. The errors
were based on "incompatible/missing declarations". The bottom line of those is
actually the following, as I gather:
I, without any compilers in /usr/bin, was trying to build the world and kernel
by setting CC
For reference, my e-mails related to the build errors were:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-February/039672.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-February/039675.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-February/039857.html
___
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 16:02 +0100, deeptech71 wrote:
> Recently, I've posted several build errors that only I seemed to run into.
> The errors were based on "incompatible/missing declarations". The bottom line
> of those is actually the following, as I gather:
>
> I, without any compilers in /us
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>>
>> Ok, that's weird. What does a simple "nslookup ftp.freebsd.org" give you?
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 27, 20
Excluding the build errors arising from code becoming incompatible with old
headers [1], the use of the latest version of Clang/LLVM for the world and
kernel is mostly hitch-free, if I
(1)remove, from the Clang installation, the headers that are already
available in /usr/include, ie.,
On 26 February 2013 16:20, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:39:26PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> The functions from sbin/mount/getmntopts.c are used in a bunch of other
>> stuff like mount_* utilities which have to suck them in as their own
>> functions in qui
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Daniel Nebdal
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, that's weird. What does a simple "nslookup ftp.freebsd.org" give
> you?
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb
On 26 February 2013 23:11, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>>
>>
>> External mount-like utilities may also have difficulties with building
>> to get getmntopts.c source as this requires /usr/src presence which is
>> in sync with insta
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:32:33 pm matt wrote:
> On 02/26/13 10:46, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, February 25, 2013 11:20:29 pm matt wrote:
> >> On 02/25/13 18:33, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >>> [101232] acpi_video0: on vgapci0
> >>> found Internal/Integrated Digital Flat Panel(400), idx#0,
On Sunday, February 24, 2013 2:57:32 pm matt wrote:
> What does this mean exactly?
>
> Whenever I call/evaluate certain ACPI paths, this gets printed on console.
>
> I assume it's a concurrent access issue or something, or perhaps just a
> bios/uefi problem?
#define APIC_ESR_ILLEGAL_REGISTER
On 02/27/13 06:28, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
>
> nslookup ftp.freebsd.org
>
> ;; connection timed out ; trying next origin
> ;; connection timed out ; no servers could be reached
>
>
>
> netbsd , openbsd , dragonflybsd is working .
> ftp.tr.freebsd.org is working .
>
>
>
>
What is `cat /etc/re
On 02/27/13 09:08, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, February 24, 2013 2:57:32 pm matt wrote:
>> What does this mean exactly?
>>
>> Whenever I call/evaluate certain ACPI paths, this gets printed on console.
>>
>> I assume it's a concurrent access issue or something, or perhaps just a
>> bios/uefi pr
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:15 AM, matt wrote:
> On 02/27/13 06:28, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> >
> >
> > nslookup ftp.freebsd.org
> >
> > ;; connection timed out ; trying next origin
> > ;; connection timed out ; no servers could be reached
> >
> >
> >
> > netbsd , openbsd , dragonflybsd is wo
On 02/27/13 09:00, John Baldwin wrote:
> If that is true, it's because your BIOS is lying. Do you have a URL to
> your ASL lying around already?
Too big for pastebin :( +500k
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6YlMzJxarGbVnotLUdNWWNTVG8/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks,
Matt
__
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 07:08:35PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> I have put it on freefall for convenience.
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pluknet/patches/getmntopts.2.patch
Should the synopsis for getmntopts(3) use #include , instead
of '"', as well as the example ?
For the mntopts.h itself, I
I have installed snapshot
FreeBSD-9.1-STABLE-amd64-20130223-r247167-release.iso
# traceroute ftp.freebsd.org
3 failures : traceroute : unknown host ftp.freebsd.org
2 successes :
Route is Izmir ( Turkey ) -> Frankfurt -> New York -> San Jose ->
freebsd.isc.org ( 204.152.184.73 )
and pkg_add is
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> I have installed snapshot
>
> FreeBSD-9.1-STABLE-amd64-20130223-r247167-release.iso
>
> # traceroute ftp.freebsd.org
>
> 3 failures : traceroute : unknown host ftp.freebsd.org
> 2 successes :
>
> Route is Izmir ( Turkey ) -> Frankfur
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> On 2013-02-27 20:25, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> > I have installed snapshot
> >
> > FreeBSD-9.1-STABLE-amd64-20130223-r247167-release.iso
> >
> > # traceroute ftp.freebsd.org
> >
> > 3 failures : traceroute : unknown host ftp.freebsd.or
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> wrote:
> > I have installed snapshot
> >
> > FreeBSD-9.1-STABLE-amd64-20130223-r247167-release.iso
> >
> > # traceroute ftp.freebsd.org
> >
> > 3 failures : traceroute : unknown host f
On 2013-02-27 20:25, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> I have installed snapshot
>
> FreeBSD-9.1-STABLE-amd64-20130223-r247167-release.iso
>
> # traceroute ftp.freebsd.org
>
> 3 failures : traceroute : unknown host ftp.freebsd.org
> 2 successes :
>
> Route is Izmir ( Turkey ) -> Frankfurt -> New Y
I updated sources a couple of days ago and when I rebooted to continue
to
the upgrade process I received errors when I attempted to mount zfs
filesystem. The error looked like this.
zpool mount -a
internal error: Invalid arugment
pid 25 (zfs), uid 0, exited on signal 6
Abort trap
I ge
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:35:43 pm matt wrote:
> On 02/27/13 09:00, John Baldwin wrote:
> > If that is true, it's because your BIOS is lying. Do you have a URL to
> > your ASL lying around already?
> Too big for pastebin :( +500k
>
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6YlMzJxarGbVnotLUdNWWN
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:17:40 pm matt wrote:
> On 02/27/13 09:08, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Sunday, February 24, 2013 2:57:32 pm matt wrote:
> >> What does this mean exactly?
> >>
> >> Whenever I call/evaluate certain ACPI paths, this gets printed on console.
> >>
> >> I assume it's a co
- Original Message -
From: "Derrick Dantavious Edwards"
I updated sources a couple of days ago and when I rebooted to continue to
the upgrade process I received errors when I attempted to mount zfs
filesystem. The error looked like this.
zpool mount -a
internal error: Invalid arugme
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Derrick Dantavious Edwards"
>
>
>> I updated sources a couple of days ago and when I rebooted to continue to
>> the upgrade process I received errors when I attempted to mount zfs
>> filesystem. The error
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 02:59:16PM -0800, sean bruno wrote:
> Yup, totally hit this today and was yelling at various people about it.
>
> the Kernel and the ZFS tools in userland need to be updated at the same time.
>
> Boot back into the old kernel and (cd /usr/src/cddl && make install)
> to upd
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 02:59:16 PM you wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Steven Hartland
>
> wrote:
> > - Original Message - From: "Derrick Dantavious Edwards"
> >
> >> I updated sources a couple of days ago and when I rebooted to continue to
> >> the upgrade process I r
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 02:59:16 PM you wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Steven Hartland
>
> wrote:
> > - Original Message - From: "Derrick Dantavious Edwards"
> >
> >> I updated sources a couple of days ago and when I rebooted to continue to
> >> the upgrade process I r
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 07:21:39PM -0500, Derrick Dantavious Edwards wrote:
> > >> [...]
> > >> I updated sources a couple of days ago and when I rebooted to continue to
> > >> the upgrade process I received errors when I attempted to mount zfs
> > >> filesystem. The error looked like t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/27/13 16:33, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 07:21:39PM -0500, Derrick Dantavious
> Edwards wrote:
> [...] I updated sources a couple of days ago and when I
> rebooted to continue to the upgrade process I re
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 04:37:47PM -0800, Xin Li wrote:
> > In mid-February, zpool version was upgraded to include
> > lz4_compress. My understanding was that changing from the
> > OpenSolaris ZFS version number scheme (i.e., "v28") to what we have
> > on -CURRENT (i.e., "5000") was so that we can
I'll email later, but I do have two PCI devices show up in pciconf
-lv; but acpi_video() only attaches to one.
I don't know why two PCI devices show up.. guess there's more digging to do.
ADrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/27/13 16:44, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 04:37:47PM -0800, Xin Li wrote:
>>> In mid-February, zpool version was upgraded to include
>>> lz4_compress. My understanding was that changing from the
>>> OpenSolaris ZFS version nu
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:09:02PM -0800, Xin Li wrote:
> Martin actually have done very good job maintaining ioctl
> compatibility when we jumped from v15 to v28 that most people didn't
> even notice that the ioctl was changed.
>
As one who has gone through that upgrade on head/, stable/9/, and
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:27:36 -0500
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:35:43 pm matt wrote:
> > On 02/27/13 09:00, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > If that is true, it's because your BIOS is lying. Do you have a
> > > URL to your ASL lying around already?
> > Too big for pasteb
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> On 2013-02-27 20:25, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> > I have installed snapshot
> >
> > FreeBSD-9.1-STABLE-amd64-20130223-r247167-release.iso
> >
> > # traceroute ftp.freebsd.org
> >
> > 3 failures : traceroute : unknown host ftp.freebsd.or
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>
>> On 2013-02-27 20:25, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>> > I have installed snapshot
>> >
>> > FreeBSD-9.1-STABLE-amd64-20130223-r247167-release.iso
>> >
>> > # traceroute ftp.freebsd.o
On 02/27/13 12:27, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:35:43 pm matt wrote:
On 02/27/13 09:00, John Baldwin wrote:
If that is true, it's because your BIOS is lying. Do you have a URL to
your ASL lying around already?
Too big for pastebin :( +500k
https://docs.google.com/file
54 matches
Mail list logo