Re: files disappearing from ls on NFS

2013-05-13 Thread Hartmut Brandt
On Sun, 12 May 2013, Rick Macklem wrote: RMHartmut Brandt wrote: RM Hi, RM RM I've updated one of my -current machines this week (previous update RM was in RM february). Now I see a strange effect (it seems only on NFS mounts): RM ls or RM even echo * will list only some files (strange enough

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2013-05-13 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-13 08:20:35 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-13 08:20:35 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2013-05-13 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-13 10:13:53 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-13 10:13:53 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

FreeBSD-HEAD gets stuck on vnode operations

2013-05-13 Thread Roger Pau Monné
Hello, I've set up a FreeBSD-HEAD VM on Xen, and compiled the XENHVM kernel, last commit in the repository is: Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 12:39:14 + Subject: [PATCH] By request, add an arrow from NetBSD-0.8 to FreeBSD-1.0. While here, add a few more NetBSD versions to the tree itself.

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2013-05-13 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-13 10:26:26 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-13 10:26:26 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-05-13 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-13 11:16:44 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-13 11:16:44 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2013-05-13 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-13 10:39:58 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-13 10:39:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-05-13 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-13 11:05:32 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-13 11:05:32 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: FreeBSD-HEAD gets stuck on vnode operations

2013-05-13 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On 13/05/13 13:18, Roger Pau Monné wrote: The VM can be stuck in this state for quite some time, it generally I would like to explain this a little bit more, the syncer process doesn't get blocked on the _mtx_trylock_flags_ call, it just continues looping forever in what seems to be an endless

Re: FreeBSD-HEAD gets stuck on vnode operations

2013-05-13 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 04:33:04PM +0200, Roger Pau Monn? wrote: On 13/05/13 13:18, Roger Pau Monn? wrote: The VM can be stuck in this state for quite some time, it generally I would like to explain this a little bit more, the syncer process doesn't get blocked on the _mtx_trylock_flags_

Re: openjdk6 broken on current

2013-05-13 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-05-11 05:25:41 -0400, O. Hartmann wrote: On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 17:16 -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2013-05-09 06:16, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote: On 2013-05-08 13:37, Larry

Re: openjdk6 broken on current

2013-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2013-05-13 13:20, Jung-uk Kim wrote: How recent is your -CURRENT? FYI, recently we fixed couple of auto-vectorization bugs, i.e., http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=249817 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=250593 I have feeling that one of these might

r250609: error: use of undeclared identifier 'CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID'

2013-05-13 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
# uname -a FreeBSD mech-aslap239.men.bris.ac.uk 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #29 r2463 70M: Tue Feb 19 09:04:48 GMT 2013 r...@mech-aslap239.men.bris.ac.uk:/usr/obj /usr/src/sys/BUZI amd64 make buildworld: c++ -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include

Re: r250609: error: use of undeclared identifier 'CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID'

2013-05-13 Thread Dimitry Andric
On May 13, 2013, at 21:26, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote: # uname -a FreeBSD mech-aslap239.men.bris.ac.uk 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #29 r2463 70M: Tue Feb 19 09:04:48 GMT 2013 r...@mech-aslap239.men.bris.ac.uk:/usr/obj /usr/src/sys/BUZI amd64 make buildworld:

Re: files disappearing from ls on NFS

2013-05-13 Thread Rick Macklem
Hartmut Brandt wrote: On Sun, 12 May 2013, Rick Macklem wrote: RMHartmut Brandt wrote: RM Hi, RM RM I've updated one of my -current machines this week (previous update RM was in RM february). Now I see a strange effect (it seems only on NFS mounts): RM ls or RM even echo * will list

Re: problem building -current

2013-05-13 Thread Dimitry Andric
On May 7, 2013, at 16:10, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2013-05-07 16:01, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 7 May 2013 17:21, Michael W. Lucas mwlu...@michaelwlucas.com wrote: ... c++ -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include

Re: FreeBSD Intel AMT

2013-05-13 Thread Kamil Czekirda
Jack, do you have any ideas to resolve problem, on new Debian 7 and Ubuntu 13.10 AMT working fine. 2013/5/9 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org On Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:34:16 am Kamil Czekirda wrote: Do you have any ideas to resolve the problem? I have no idea what part of e1000 common code

Re: FreeBSD Intel AMT

2013-05-13 Thread Jack Vogel
I need to know the details on the hardware this is on, and was it working on some previous version of FreeBSD and broke in STABLE or what? Jack On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Kamil Czekirda kczeki...@gmail.com wrote: Jack, do you have any ideas to resolve problem, on new Debian 7 and