Re: lost my r2xxxxx subversion id in uname kern.version

2013-07-15 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:15:52 +0200 cpghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote: On 07/13/13 03:03, Dan Mack wrote: I'm not sure exactly when but recently I've lost the subversion id from kern.version and hence uname and motd. Subsequent fresh rebuilds from source don't bring it back even after

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:12:19AM +, Teske, Devin wrote: On Jul 14, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 14/07/2013 06:48, Teske, Devin wrote: Question: Where can I learn more about the actual format of what's in the new tarballs? This is going to be important not for

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 07:29:50AM +, Teske, Devin wrote: Or you can maintain the old cruft for your business -- just don't expect anyone else to use it, or even want to. I have no intention of making old-world packages... but I also have no intention of using pkg create.

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 04:52:26PM +, Teske, Devin wrote: On Jul 14, 2013, at 8:01 AM, Chris Rees wrote: On 14 Jul 2013, at 08:29, Teske, Devin wrote: Simple, really. Let's take RPM for example. The RPM package format has been ported to other platforms. So does pkgng ported

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 06:51:00PM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, at 13:54, Teske, Devin wrote: If FTP access (or any of the other remote access methods) are going away for HEAD pkg access, I'll need to know so I can make the appropriate changes in the HEAD branch of

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +, Teske, Devin wrote: On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, I have just committed (r253305) a change the make pkg_install not being built and installed by default on HEAD. If you are still relying on it, be careful

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Julian Elischer
On 7/15/13 6:43 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.comwrote: I assume that poudiere builds packages from ports. Yes. That's not how we build package repositories here (and would expect that there are many more like us). How

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Julian Elischer
On 7/15/13 10:12 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: On Jul 14, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.commailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: I assume that poudiere builds packages from ports. Yes. That's not how we build

Re: Sound lag over HDMI

2013-07-15 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
2013/7/12 Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org: On 12.07.2013 23:54, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: I'm trying to setup XBMC on a -CURRENT box with an IvyBridge CPU and GPU. While testing playback via mplayer on a LG TV over HDMI, I noticed that sound is lagging video by about 100-200ms or so. When I

Re: r248583 Kernel panic: negative refcount 0xfffffe0031b59168

2013-07-15 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hi. On 02.07.2013 05:10, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 01:18:36PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: Turns out the bug is quite funny ;) Try this: diff --git a/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c b/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c index 5d8e814..7a4db04 100644 --- a/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c +++

Re: r248583 Kernel panic: negative refcount 0xfffffe0031b59168

2013-07-15 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hi. On 15.07.2013 15:16, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: Guys, if this is working, why it's not commited to HEAD ? I'm still hitting this bug on r251990 and later ones. I'm terribly sorry, I should read the revisions more carefully. Eugene. ___

Re: r248583 Kernel panic: negative refcount 0xfffffe0031b59168

2013-07-15 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 03:16:37PM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: Hi. On 02.07.2013 05:10, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 01:18:36PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: Turns out the bug is quite funny ;) Try this: diff --git a/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c

Re: Ports with daemons on uninstall...

2013-07-15 Thread Mark Felder
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, at 14:49, Garrett Wollman wrote: Strongly agreed -- and it's what other operating systems do, either by policy or by convention. As long as this behavior only happens during pkg installs and never with ports, I'm OK. The worst is when a coworker forgets that the mysql

Re: Ports with daemons on uninstall...

2013-07-15 Thread RW
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:34:05 -0500 Mark Felder wrote: On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, at 14:49, Garrett Wollman wrote: Strongly agreed -- and it's what other operating systems do, either by policy or by convention. As long as this behavior only happens during pkg installs and never with ports,

Re: Ports with daemons on uninstall...

2013-07-15 Thread Walter Hurry
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:34:05 -0500, Mark Felder wrote: As long as this behavior only happens during pkg installs and never with ports, I'm OK. The worst is when a coworker forgets that the mysql port stops the daemon and my coworker upgrades with portmaster... the daemon is off the entire

Re: Ports with daemons on uninstall...

2013-07-15 Thread Lars Engels
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:46:03PM +, Walter Hurry wrote: On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:34:05 -0500, Mark Felder wrote: As long as this behavior only happens during pkg installs and never with ports, I'm OK. The worst is when a coworker forgets that the mysql port stops the daemon and my

r253351 implicit definition of 'critical_exit'.

2013-07-15 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Hi Recent change: - # svn log ./sys/sys/sf_buf.h |less r253351 | ae | 2013-07-15 08:16:57 +0200 (Mon, 15 Jul 2013) | 6 lines Introduce new structure sfstat for collecting sendfile's statistics and remove corresponding

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2013-07-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-07-15 10:40:20 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-07-15 10:40:20 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: Ports with daemons on uninstall...

2013-07-15 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Walter Hurry wrote: On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:34:05 -0500, Mark Felder wrote: As long as this behavior only happens during pkg installs and never with ports, I'm OK. The worst is when a coworker forgets that the mysql port stops the daemon and my coworker upgrades with portmaster... the

Re: r253351 implicit definition of 'critical_exit'.

2013-07-15 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 15 July 2013 18:01, Ian FREISLICH i...@clue.co.za wrote: Hi Recent change: - # svn log ./sys/sys/sf_buf.h |less r253351 | ae | 2013-07-15 08:16:57 +0200 (Mon, 15 Jul 2013) | 6 lines Introduce new structure

Re: Ports with daemons on uninstall...

2013-07-15 Thread Mark Felder
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, at 8:44, RW wrote: Is that really correct? I would expect the deinstall to be done after the build has completed successfully. That might not be accurate with a current portmaster, but we used to have that happen all too frequently. I just checked the plist and it has

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Teske, Devin
On Jul 14, 2013, at 11:23 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:12:19AM +, Teske, Devin wrote: On Jul 14, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 14/07/2013 06:48, Teske, Devin wrote: Question: Where can I learn more about the actual format of what's in the new

Re: Ports with daemons on uninstall...

2013-07-15 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, at 8:44, RW wrote: Is that really correct? I would expect the deinstall to be done after the build has completed successfully. That might not be accurate with a current portmaster, but we used to

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Teske, Devin
On Jul 14, 2013, at 11:27 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 07:29:50AM +, Teske, Devin wrote: Or you can maintain the old cruft for your business -- just don't expect anyone else to use it, or even want to. I have no intention of making old-world packages...

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Teske, Devin
On Jul 14, 2013, at 11:33 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 04:52:26PM +, Teske, Devin wrote: On Jul 14, 2013, at 8:01 AM, Chris Rees wrote: On 14 Jul 2013, at 08:29, Teske, Devin wrote: Simple, really. Let's take RPM for example. The RPM package format has been

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2013-07-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-07-15 15:46:26 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-07-15 15:46:26 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Teske, Devin
On Jul 14, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 06:51:00PM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, at 13:54, Teske, Devin wrote: If FTP access (or any of the other remote access methods) are going away for HEAD pkg access, I'll need to know so I

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Mark Felder
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:48:18 -0500, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: I think Mark was saying that libfetch doesn't yet support http proxy. Now that I've googled, I was referring to this PR http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=180253 I thought it was complete missing

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-15 Thread Teske, Devin
On Jul 14, 2013, at 11:42 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +, Teske, Devin wrote: On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, I have just committed (r253305) a change the make pkg_install not being built and installed by default on

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2013-07-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-07-15 14:13:41 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-07-15 14:13:41 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: errors building 9-STABLE on recent HEAD

2013-07-15 Thread Brooks Davis
After not working for quite some time, I was able to build 9-STABLE last week. I'm not sure if something changed in the branch or if the new current I'd updated to fixed it. -- Brooks On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:07:04PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: Hi, I see exactly the same error on pointyhat

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-07-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-07-15 18:03:38 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-07-15 18:03:38 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: expanding past 1 TB on amd64

2013-07-15 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Chris Torek chris.to...@gmail.com wrote: In src/sys/amd64/include/vmparam.h is this handy map: * 0x - 0x7fff user map * 0x8000 - 0x7fff does not exist (hole) * 0x8000 - 0x804020100fff

[head tinderbox] failure on armv6/arm

2013-07-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-07-15 21:10:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-07-15 21:10:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: errors building 9-STABLE on recent HEAD

2013-07-15 Thread wen heping
I build 9-STABLE on head today, while failed many times last month. wen 2013/7/16 Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org After not working for quite some time, I was able to build 9-STABLE last week. I'm not sure if something changed in the branch or if the new current I'd updated to fixed it.

Re: errors building 9-STABLE on recent HEAD

2013-07-15 Thread hiren panchasara
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:27 PM, wen heping wenhep...@gmail.com wrote: I build 9-STABLE on head today, while failed many times last month. There were some intermittent issues but *recent* stable/9 should build fine on *recent* head. If not, please report the errors and have sjg@ look at them.