Re: Slow boot with 256GB of RAM?

2013-11-16 Thread Darren Pilgrim
At the risk of facetiousness, the nice thing about FreeBSD is that you have to deal with this problem only a few times per year. ;) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, s

Re: Are clang++ and libc++ compatible?

2013-11-16 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:40:42 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:19:46PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:19:22 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: >>> This can't be good. And, unfortunately, testing math/octave shows >>> no better :( >>> >>> % octave >>> Segmentation

Re: Slow boot with 256GB of RAM?

2013-11-16 Thread Allan Jude
On 2013-11-16 00:48, Matthias Petermann wrote: > Hello James, > > Am 16.11.2013 05:37, schrieb James R. Van Artsdalen: > > Asus Z9PA-U8 motherboard, 256GB of RAM, 2.4 GHz Xeon E5-2695 v2, > > FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r258092 > > > There is a two minute pause when booting, after the loader's SMAP > > di

Re: Are clang++ and libc++ compatible?

2013-11-16 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 01:58:11PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:40:42 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:19:46PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:19:22 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > >>> This can't be good. And, unfortunately, testi

Re: Are clang++ and libc++ compatible?

2013-11-16 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:54:55 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 01:58:11PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:40:42 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:19:46PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:19:22 -0800 Steve Kargl wr

Re: Slow boot with 256GB of RAM?

2013-11-16 Thread James R. Van Artsdalen
On 11/16/2013 8:52 AM, Allan Jude wrote: > I see this was in the release notes for 9.0 and 8.3, but other than > that, I don't see how anyone was supposed to find out about this. > Maybe it would make sense to print 'Starting memory test, set > hw.memtest.test=0 to disable' before that starts, so

Re: Slow boot with 256GB of RAM?

2013-11-16 Thread Allan Jude
On 2013-11-16 13:36, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: > On 11/16/2013 8:52 AM, Allan Jude wrote: >> I see this was in the release notes for 9.0 and 8.3, but other than >> that, I don't see how anyone was supposed to find out about this. >> Maybe it would make sense to print 'Starting memory test, set

Re: Slow boot with 256GB of RAM?

2013-11-16 Thread Eitan Adler
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Zach Crum wrote: > This setting is not listed in /boot/defaults/loader.conf. Is it supposed to > be singular or plural? Plural. I will commit the patch. Does any know of cases where this memory test actually catches errors? How important is it? -- Eitan Adler