pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Vladimir Sharun
I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph tunnel with Real_IP_B. I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the traffic back via tunnel, if it came via tunnel: pass in quick on $tunnel_if reply-to ($tunnel_if 10.1.0.1) \ proto tcp from any to Real_IP_B port

pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Vladimir Sharun
I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph tunnel with Real_IP_B. I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the traffic back via tunnel, if it came via tunnel: pass in quick on $tunnel_if reply-to ($tunnel_if 10.1.0.1) \ proto tcp from any to Real_IP_B

Re: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Vladimir, On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph tunnel with Real_IP_B. V I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the traffic back via tunnel, if V it came via tunnel: V V pass in

Re[2]: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Vladimir Sharun
Dear Gleb, Is kernel rebuilding enuff ? Vladimir, On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph tunnel with Real_IP_B. V I have used a reply-to pf ruleset to sent all the traffic back via

Re: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:09:14PM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V Dear Gleb, V Is kernel rebuilding enuff ? Should be enough wrt pf(4), no API or ABI changes in it. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 now available

2013-12-03 Thread Glen Barber
The fourth BETA build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and sparc64 architectures. This is expected to be the final BETA build of the 10.0-RELEASE cycle. The image checksums follow at the end of this email. ISO

Re[2]: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Vladimir Sharun
Dear Gleb, Unfortunately can't boot both revisions kernel, it hangs on trying to mount root from ssdzfs  (which is my zfs root). Vladimir, On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V I have a test setup with direct internet connection Reail_IP_A and netgraph tunnel

Re: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

2013-12-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 07:54:08PM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote: V Dear Gleb, V Unfortunately can't boot both revisions kernel, it hangs on trying to mount root from ssdzfs  (which is my zfs root). V Vladimir, You can run the kernel that boots, but update only sys/netpfil/pf directory to

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-03 Thread Antoine Brodin
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found anything new? Having build the

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-03 Thread Jan Henrik Sylvester
On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found anything new? Having build the port and all dependencies with

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-03 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-03 Thread Jan Henrik Sylvester
On 12/03/2013 21:54, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: Trying to migrate to 10,

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-03 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:37:34 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: On 12/03/2013 21:54, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote: The tests were successful:

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 now available

2013-12-03 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Glen Barber (excerpt): Changes between -BETA3 and -BETA4 include: - Add preliminary support for RTL8106E, RTL8168G, RTL8168GU, RTL8411B, and RTL8168EP. - Enable fingerprint checking in pkg(8) for FreeBSD-provided binary packages. - Remove the WITH_LIBICONV_COMPAT

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-03 Thread Jan Henrik Sylvester
On 12/04/2013 00:23, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:37:34 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: On 12/03/2013 21:54, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote: The tests were successful:

10-BETA{3,4} - Consistent Kernel Panics (pf_ioctl.c:1289)

2013-12-03 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
10.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 #0 r258860 KERNCONF: include GENERIC options DDB options ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER options ROUTETABLES=6 options VIMAGE makeoptions DEBUG=-g device pf device pflog

tcl tk ports on FreeBSD 10 amd64

2013-12-03 Thread Cy Schubert
Hi, Sorry for cross posting but this concerns both lists. Over the last month or so I've been upgrading my prod infrastructure from 9 to 10. It's mostly complete except for a number of issues. One issue, just solved today (circumvented is a better word), is exmh crashing 10.0 on amd64 while

Re: 10-BETA{3,4} - Consistent Kernel Panics (pf_ioctl.c:1289)

2013-12-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:19:49AM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: W 10.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 #0 r258860 W W KERNCONF: W W include GENERIC W W options DDB W options ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER W W options ROUTETABLES=6 W options VIMAGE W W makeoptions

Re: 10-BETA{3,4} - Consistent Kernel Panics (pf_ioctl.c:1289)

2013-12-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:19:49AM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: W 10.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 #0 r258860 W W KERNCONF: W W include GENERIC W W options DDB W options ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER W W options ROUTETABLES=6 W options VIMAGE W W makeoptions

Re: 10-BETA{3,4} - Consistent Kernel Panics (pf_ioctl.c:1289)

2013-12-03 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Wilkinson, Alex alex.wilkin...@cba.com.auwrote: 10.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 #0 r258860 KERNCONF: options VIMAGE makeoptions DEBUG=-g device pf device pflog device pfsync device carp How badly do you