TB --- 2013-12-16 08:03:49 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 08:03:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-12-16 07:26:58 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 07:26:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
Hi Kohji,
A regression issue has been reported when using the CHAIN-BIT patch. Can
you verify this additional patch on you hardware and report back?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/259462
Thank you!
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
[ This message is cross-posted between x11@, current@ and ports@ for
maximum coverage. Please please PLEASE respect reply-to: ]
The xorg stack has been switched to use what has been dubbed new xorg in
CURRENT. This means new xserver, new MESA (dri/libGL) stack and in some
cases new versions.
If
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:53:31 +0100
Hi Kohji,
A regression issue has been reported when using the CHAIN-BIT patch. Can you
verify this additional patch on you hardware and report back?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/259462
Thank
On 15.12.2013 22:22, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
FreeBSD gravity.local 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #7 r259286:
Fri Dec 13 00:33:37 EST 2013
eitan@gravity.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EADLER amd64
Complete textdump here:
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
0n Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:16:52PM +1100, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:21:09PM -0800, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
C KERNCONF:
C
C options VIMAGE
C
C makeoptions DEBUG=-g
C
C device pf
C device pflog
The second RC build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and
sparc64 architectures.
The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images
are
Is it ok in kernel code to use __builtin_prefetch() and assume that
all supported compilers will do the right thing for all architectures ?
I am asking is because I need to use prefetch() in a small number
of places in my netmap code, and nothing in our kernel sources uses
__builtin_prefetch()
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
/usr/src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump/../../../contrib/tcpdump/addrtoname.c:36:10:
fatal error: 'libcapsicum.h' file not found
#include libcapsicum.h
I have, notably, WITHOUT_CAPSICUM=1 in /etc/src.conf.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
TB --- 2013-12-16 16:49:40 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 16:49:40 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
The following is a proof-of-concept patch to make system builds
less chatty.
It also has the nice side effect of showing more clearly
which rules are used during the build and possibly help
debugging the share/mk files and the individual Makefiles.
The logic is the following:
the
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
The following is a proof-of-concept patch to make system builds
less chatty.
It also has the nice side effect of showing more clearly
which rules are used during the build and possibly help
debugging the share/mk files
TB --- 2013-12-16 19:08:08 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 19:08:08 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-12-16 18:33:18 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 18:33:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On 16 Dec 2013, at 19:46, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
The following is a proof-of-concept patch to make system builds
less chatty.
It also has the nice side effect of showing more clearly
which rules are used during the build and possibly help
debugging the share/mk files and the
Hi guys!
I've investigate problem a bit. And can say that callout initialized with
callout_int(), w/o mpsafe flag:
callout_init(vw-vw_proc_dead_timer, 0);
[sys/dev/vt/vt_core.c:1714]
And callout_init did not set CALLOUT_RETURNUNLOCKED flag, and assign it's
lock object to Giant, but where Giant
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko r...@dlink.ua wrote:
Hi guys!
I've investigate problem a bit. And can say that callout initialized with
callout_int(), w/o mpsafe flag:
callout_init(vw-vw_proc_dead_timer, 0);
[sys/dev/vt/vt_core.c:1714]
And callout_init did not set
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:34:35 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:34:35 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:12:57 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:12:57 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
My bad, lemme go figure out what the hell causes this to break on
these platforms.
-a
On 16 December 2013 17:34, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote:
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on
freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - FreeBSD
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:07:50 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:07:50 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-12-17 04:25:48 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-17 04:25:48 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-12-17 02:57:09 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-17 02:57:09 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
31 matches
Mail list logo