Re: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1000 can't connect to AP

Will I need to tie debug? Not wifi, laptop use is indeed very painful 2013/12/11 Adrian Chadd > OK, I'll see if my centrino 1xx / 1xxx units match yours and are > problematic. > > Please file a PR! > > > -a > > On 7 December 2013 05:34, 乔楚 wrote: > > Today ,I upgrade my freebsd from 10-beta4

Re: General Protection Fault in prelist_remove()

On 09/16/13 19:33, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi Mark, -Original message- From:Mark Johnston mailto:ma...@freebsd.org> > Sent: Monday 16th September 2013 19:09 To: Hans Petter Selasky mailto:hans.petter.sela...@bitfrost.no> > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Re: [HEADS UP] xorg version switch in CURRENT

On 18-12-2013 5:22, J M wrote: Following this list: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2013-December/013911.html Rebuild xorg again on FreeBSD 10.0 rc2: WITH_NEW_XORG= WITH_KMS= WITH_GALLIUM= Build es2tri.c in mesa demos http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/demos/tree/src/egl/opengles2/

Re: [HEADS UP] enabling LLDB debugger by default on amd64

Hi Ed, How are you planning on building the LLVM / Clang libraries? Will they be statically linked to the compiler and the debugger, or do you intend to make them dynamic too? I found about a small slowdown with a dynamic clang, but the link times were much lower when building. Currently,

Re: new Xorg (KMS, etc.) for Radeon 9600

On 18.12.2013 07:41, d...@gmx.com wrote: > Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote, On 12/17/2013 22:20: >> On 16.12.2013 08:36, d...@gmx.com wrote: >>> Still nobody wants to apply Robert Noland's DRM patch? >> >> What problem(s) does this patch fix? > > It fixes non-deterministic lockups when the (old, drm1)

Re: 10-RC unable to build kernel without INET (i.e. IPv6-only)

Gleb, > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:13:20PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote: > M> Under 9.2 the following could be used to build an IPv6-only kernel: > M> include GENERIC > M> makeoptions MKMODULESENV+="WITHOUT_INET_SUPPORT=" > M> nooptions INET > M> Now with stable/10 ... fails while building

Re: urtwn driver for Edimax EW-7811U WLAN nano USB Adapter

On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:24:09AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I got one of these (if_urtwn) and it works enough to download about a meg > or so before the watchdog kicks in and I have to ifconfig down/up it to > get it to respond again. > > I even have a patch pending to add the usb identifi

ZFS Boot patch

An issue we thought we had fixed, was not actually fixed. When doing a GELI based Root-on-ZFS install, the 'bootpool' is not always properly mounted in the installed system. The lines added to loader.conf to make it use the zpool.cache file and learn of the existence of the 2nd pool are required,

makefs enhancement for better rock-ridge support

A while ago, it was reported that the ISO images that FreeBSD generates have a variety of problems (thread starts here): http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-April/073050.html And again for the 10.0 releases: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-December/0762

root-on-zfs /var/empty

I've seen a number of comments about the /var/empty dataset The reason this is not set readonly=on during the installation is that this causes the installation to fail (when the installer tries to create/set flags). This can be set during the post install, or it might be worth considering Colin P

Re: ZFS Boot patch

On 2013-12-18 12:27, Allan Jude wrote: > An issue we thought we had fixed, was not actually fixed. > > When doing a GELI based Root-on-ZFS install, the 'bootpool' is not > always properly mounted in the installed system. > > The lines added to loader.conf to make it use the zpool.cache file and > l

Re: FreeBSD 10 and zfsd

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013, at 11:26, Alan Somers wrote: > > Due to popular demand, I have located a round toit. I'm currently > working on rebasing the zfsd project branch to head, after which I'll > push SpectraLogic's recent changes. > Just thought I'd ping the list about the situation here... woul

Re: FreeBSD 10 and zfsd

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013, at 11:26, Alan Somers wrote: > > > > Due to popular demand, I have located a round toit. I'm currently > > working on rebasing the zfsd project branch to head, after which I'll > > push SpectraLogic's recent changes. >

Re: new Xorg (KMS, etc.) for Radeon 9600

[snip] So the standard trop of UNLOCK/WORK/RELOCK is pretty dangerous. There's no state re-validation going on when you re-acquire that lock. So, although it meets the lock requirements, it may not be 'correct'. It's scattered throughout the code base (wifi drivers aren't an exception here either

Re: ZFS Boot patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Dec 18, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Allan Jude wrote: On 2013-12-18 12:27, Allan Jude wrote: An issue we thought we had fixed, was not actually fixed. When doing a GELI based Root-on-ZFS install, the 'bootpool' is not always properly mounted in the insta

svn && ports, or the hen && egg

Hi, As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the system before with some binary packages, only based on base system and sources? T

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

On 12/18/13 14:50, Matthias Apitz wrote: Hi, As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the system before with some binary packages,

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base > system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the > system before with som

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

On 18 Dec 2013, at 21:50, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base > system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the > system before with some bina

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:50:27PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hi, > > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base > system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the > syst

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

El día Wednesday, December 18, 2013 a las 12:59:16PM -0800, Freddie Cash escribió: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > > CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base > > s

Re: FreeBSD 10 and zfsd

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Mark Felder wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013, at 11:26, Alan Somers wrote: >> > >> > Due to popular demand, I have located a round toit. I'm currently >> > working on rebasing the zfsd project branch

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, December 18, 2013 a las 12:59:16PM -0800, Freddie Cash > escribió: > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Apitz > wrote: > > > > > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > > > CVS)

Re: FreeBSD 10 and zfsd

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Alan Somers wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Outback Dingo > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013, at 11:26, Alan Somers wrote: > >> > > >> > Due to popular demand, I have located a roun

Re: r259072 is not a happy camper...

On Saturday, December 14, 2013 3:44:39 am Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <201312131620.25107@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes: > > >> >Hmmm. Maybe do 'show lapic' and 'show apic' in ddb and paste that here? > >> > >> sorry about the delay... > >> > >> db> show lapic > >> lapic ID =

Re: r259072 is not a happy camper...

In message <201312181458.20649@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes: >> >Does it get a crashdump if you try? >> >> No :-( >> >> There may be a connection to unclean UFS filesystems (SU + TRIM, no J). > >Is this reproducible? Not really. It seems to happen at random, usually shortly after boot

Re: RFC: less chatty system builds

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 16 Dec 2013, at 19:46, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > The following is a proof-of-concept patch to make system builds > > less chatty. > > > > It also has the nice side effect of showing more clearly > > which rules are used during the build a

Re: urtwn driver for Edimax EW-7811U WLAN nano USB Adapter

On 2013/12/18 23:48, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:24:09AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: I got one of these (if_urtwn) and it works enough to download about a meg or so before the watchdog kicks in and I have to ifconfig down/up it to get it to respond again. I even have a

panic with deactivated geom mirror (both 9.2 and 10.0-RC2)

Greetings all - I've got a completely reproducible panic when issuing a 'gmirror status' command on a recently deactivated gmirror. NOTE: This only happens on a machine with more than 1 CPU. I filed a bug report on it: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=184985 Script to reproduce the

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

On 2013-12-18 22:09, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, December 18, 2013 a las 12:59:16PM -0800, Freddie Cash > escribió: > >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: >> >>> As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not >>> CVS) and the svn client i

ral(4) panic. head, r257837

Hi, I have following setup: wlans_ral0="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA" cloned_interfaces="lagg0 bridge0 tap0" ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto failover laggport alc0 laggport wlan0 DHCP" ifconfig_bridge0="addm tap0 addm lagg0" When system boot I have reproducible panic after messages Waiting 30s for the

Re: ral(4) panic. head, r257837

What's at frame 10? And list the IP, ie: list *0x817da911 -a On 18 December 2013 23:04, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: > Hi, > > I have following setup: > > wlans_ral0="wlan0" > ifconfig_wlan0="WPA" > > cloned_interfaces="lagg0 bridge0 tap0" > ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto failover laggport alc0

Re: makefs enhancement for better rock-ridge support

Would you mind filing a PR? -a On 18 December 2013 09:27, Kurt Lidl wrote: > A while ago, it was reported that the ISO images that FreeBSD generates > have a variety of problems (thread starts here): > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-April/073050.html > > And again for t