On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:19:02AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
In porting the kernel openvswitch code to FreeBSD we
have implemented netlink sockets, so we need to pick a
number to use for AF_NETLINK/PF_NETLINK in the messages.
Obviously we'd like ovs to be loadable as a module on existing
Does anybody know if there are any third-party binary-only modules that use SDT?
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hello hackers!
I did updated version of vt's ofwfb driver, but have no HW to test.
It will be very nice if someone try it on ppc/sparc device.
Instructions on how to enable vt(9) (newcons) can be found here:
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Newcons
Patch to HEAD in attachment. (hope it will not be
On 17.01.2014 03:19, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
In porting the kernel openvswitch code to FreeBSD we
have implemented netlink sockets, so we need to pick a
Wow, great!
How deep you're planning to go with netlink support?
E.g. sockets with NETLINK_GENERIC OVS-related CMDs, or NETLINK_ROUTE
(and other
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov
melif...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 17.01.2014 03:19, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
In porting the kernel openvswitch code to FreeBSD we
have implemented netlink sockets, so we need to pick a
Wow, great!
How deep you're planning to go with netlink
Hi,
I am seeing an odd problem which seems to be triggered by svn260311
I have two machines running snapshots of stable/9 from last fall
(one 255898 sep.26, the other 258126 nov.14). All is amd64
Build a recent head (260311 and newer) with gcc fails on the sep.26 machine:
...
Hello Luigi;
On 17.01.2014 15:18, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
I am seeing an odd problem which seems to be triggered by svn260311
I have two machines running snapshots of stable/9 from last fall
(one 255898 sep.26, the other 258126 nov.14). All is amd64
Build a recent head (260311 and newer) with
TB --- 2014-01-17 19:57:58 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-01-17 19:57:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello Luigi;
On 17.01.2014 15:18, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
I am seeing an odd problem which seems to be triggered by svn260311
I have two machines running snapshots of stable/9 from last fall
(one 255898 sep.26, the
On 17.01.2014 16:07, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@freebsd.org
mailto:p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello Luigi;
On 17.01.2014 15:18, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
I am seeing an odd problem which seems to be triggered by
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:26:30PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 17.01.2014 16:07, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
The Apple change was incomplete so I guess the compiler in head is not
being strict enough. I removed the dead code and rebuilt.
Should be fixed as r260831.
Thank you for the report!
11 matches
Mail list logo