El 2016-03-03 11:27, Matthew Seaman escribió:
On 03/02/16 23:54, Glen Barber wrote:
Also note (as repeated below), running 'pkg delete -a' will implicitly
remove base system packages after they are installed.
This has the potential for many feet to be shot, given that up to now,
'pkg delete -a
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote on 03/14/2016 20:29:
Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> writes:
Bryan Drewery writes:
https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/blob/master/scripts/pkg_tree.sh
Can you publish it as a port? I know there is one written in Perl but
I like your sh without dependencies.
It's not
Hi current@ people
src.conf WITHOUT_CDDL
prevents installation of ctfconvert
lack of ctfconvert broke my GENERIC kernel build
I could submit a send-pr (or whatever we call them on web now)
so man src.conf warns of this, or do you have a better fix ?
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Un
You need comment out the following line in GENRIC kernel conf file:
makeoptions WITH_CTF=1 # Run ctfconvert(1) for DTrace
support
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi current@ people
> src.conf WITHOUT_CDDL
> prevents installation of ctfconvert
> lack
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:41:17 +0100
Fabian Keil wrote:
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
> > In the course of the last year or so the behavior of the vm system
> > has changed in regard to how aggressively Inact memory is recycled.
> >
> > My box has 8GB of memory. At the moment I'm copying 100s of gi
I wrote:
> Hi current@ people
> src.conf WITHOUT_CDDL
> prevents installation of ctfconvert
> lack of ctfconvert broke my GENERIC kernel build
Not just /usr/src/cddl/usr.bin/ctfconvert
also need /usr/src/cddl/usr.bin/ctfmerge
> I could submit a send-pr (or whatever we call them on web now)
> so
rsync... see bottom posting
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:43:46 +0100, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2016-03-14 15:19, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 19:08 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> On 13 March 2016 at 18:51, Mark Johnston wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 06:33:46PM -0700, Adrian Chadd
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:53:10 +0100, José Pérez wrote:
> El 2016-03-03 11:27, Matthew Seaman escribió:
> > On 03/02/16 23:54, Glen Barber wrote:
> >> Also note (as repeated below), running 'pkg delete -a' will implicitly
> >> remove base system packages after they are installed.
> >
> > This ha
On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 07:20 -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
> rsync... see bottom posting
>
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:43:46 +0100, olli hauer wrote:
>
> > On 2016-03-14 15:19, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 19:08 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > > On 13 March 2016 at 18:51, Mark John
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:33:20 -0700
Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 09:38:35AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > In the course of the last year or so the behavior of the vm system
> > has changed in regard to how aggressively Inact memory is recycled.
> >
> > My box has 8GB of memor
On 3/14/16 8:03 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2016-03-14 21:49, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> On 2016-03-14 18:49, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> On 2016-03-14 18:47, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 14/03/2016 22:28, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2016-03-14 17:25, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>>
This may have been my screw up
On March 15, 2016 12:05:03 PM Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 3/14/16 8:03 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-03-14 21:49, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-03-14 18:49, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-03-14 18:47, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 14/03/2016 22:28, Larry Rose
...
>> Just a point I've bought up elsewhere...
>> I've, if I recall, wrecked several filesystems (although EIDE) using
>> rsync at the normal bus rate, and sometimes
>> thumbdrives with whatever filesystem type on them.
>>
>> I settled on --bwlimit=1500, max for unattended rsync usage and
>> al
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:30:11 -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 07:20 -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
> > rsync... see bottom posting
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:43:46 +0100, olli hauer wrote:
> >
> > > On 2016-03-14 15:19, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 19:08
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194744
--- Comment #2 from Ed Maste ---
(In reply to Oliver Pinter from comment #0)
Is this patch functionally equivalent to the one in PR 153459?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194744
--- Comment #4 from o...@hardenedbsd.org ---
Yes, sorry, I looked the wrong PR. This PR is a dup of 153459.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebs
[snip]
It's not rsync itself. It's just triggering some odd behaviour.
I've poked alc; I'll work with him to see if this can be figured out.
Thanks! I'm glad I'm not the only person who has seen this behaviour!
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194744
o...@hardenedbsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o...@hardenedbsd.org
--- Com
On 2016-03-15 12:21, Larry Rosenman wrote:
This may have been my screw up
On March 15, 2016 12:05:03 PM Bryan Drewery
wrote:
On 3/14/16 8:03 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-03-14 21:49, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-03-14 18:49, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2016-03-14 18:47, Steven Ha
19 matches
Mail list logo
