Re: SD card adapter doesn't working anymore

2016-03-26 Thread Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
Ian Lepore wrote on 03/26/16 04:09 AM: On Sat, 2016-03-26 at 02:42 +0300, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: Ian Lepore wrote on 03/26/16 02:11 AM: On Fri, 2016-03-25 at 23:33 +0300, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: Hello, I have this in pciconf output:

FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9 - Build #1137 - Failure

2016-03-26 Thread jenkins-admin
FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9 - Build #1137 - Failure: Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/1137/ Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/1137/changes Full build log:

Re: failed to compile base, buldworld, with -Os CFLAGS

2016-03-26 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 25 Mar 2016, at 19:30, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 25 Mar 2016, at 05:21, Eric Camachat wrote: >> >> I tried to buildworld with -Os CFLAGS, but it failed. > ... >> PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT: >> Preprocessed source(s) and

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
hiya, can you identify a revision where it /doesn't/ do broken pipe? That'd be the best way to start debugging this and figure out which revision broke things. I haven't updated to the latest -HEAD on anything just yet; everything's a few weeks old. Thanks, -a On 25 March 2016 at 13:30, O.

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , Adrian Chadd writes: I can second that -current isn't too great right now, and I also see the breaking SSH sessions. I'm running: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #32 r296137: Sat Feb 27 11:34:01 UTC 2016 I

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , Ultima writes: > A large zfs send [...] I am not running zfs. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <201603262331.u2qnvxvm080...@gw.catspoiler.org>, Don Lewis writes: >> I am not running zfs. Ohh, and I should probably add: I don't have a swap-space configured. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread Don Lewis
On 26 Mar, Michael Butler wrote: > -current is not great for interactive use at all. The strategy of > pre-emptively dropping idle processes to swap is hurting .. big time. > > Compare inactive memory to swap in this example .. > > 110 processes: 1 running, 108 sleeping, 1 zombie > CPU: 1.2%

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread Ultima
Having this long timeout issue occur many times during the day. Normally not this bad, currently on r297060 amd64. A few hours ago had a system hang that lasted for about 1-2 hours.(not sure how long exactly, gave up waiting) It occured after a zfs destroy operation and affected sshd. (could no

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread Don Lewis
On 26 Mar, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message > > , Ultima writes: > >> A large zfs send [...] > > I am not running zfs. I am. I'm not seeing any unexpected problems. I haven't really loaded this system up

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread Don Lewis
On 26 Mar, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message > > , Adrian Chadd writes: > > I can second that -current isn't too great right now, and I also see > the breaking SSH sessions. > > I'm running: > > FreeBSD

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread O. Hartmann
Am Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:31:31 -0700 "K. Macy" schrieb: > Does this pre or postage input changes? ??? First of all, and the most visible fact is, that the ssh connection with high terminal i/o (compiling world, poudriere bulk ...) receives very often broken pipe. The

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread K. Macy
Sorry meant inpcb and autocorrect "fixed" it. On Saturday, March 26, 2016, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:31:31 -0700 > "K. Macy" > schrieb: > > > Does this pre or postage input changes? > > ??? > > First of all, and the

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread Michael Butler
-current is not great for interactive use at all. The strategy of pre-emptively dropping idle processes to swap is hurting .. big time. Compare inactive memory to swap in this example .. 110 processes: 1 running, 108 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU: 1.2% user, 0.0% nice, 4.3% system, 0.0% interrupt,

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

2016-03-26 Thread O. Hartmann
Am Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:28:16 -0400 Michael Butler schrieb: > -current is not great for interactive use at all. The strategy of > pre-emptively dropping idle processes to swap is hurting .. big time. What is the gain then? If this "feature" results in corrupted ssh