Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:19 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:39:10 +0200 > "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > > > Am Sat, 2 Apr 2016 10:55:03 +0200 > > "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > > > > > Am Sat, 02 Apr

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

In message <20160402231955.41b05526.ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, "O. Hartmann" writes: > --Sig_/eJJPtbrEuK1nN2zIpc7BmVr > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Am Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:39:10 +0200 > "O. Hartmann"

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

In message , Kevin Oberman writes: > --089e01176a5d71db0d052f8803c7 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:19 PM, O. Hartmann > wrote: > > > Am Sat, 2 Apr 2016

Re: svn commit: r297435 - head: still problems for stage 3 when gcc 4.2.1 is avoided (powerpc64 self-hosted build)

[My testing for the likes of the below does not yet extend outside powerpc64 contexts.] For the likes of self-hosted powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc/powerpc64-gcc use with, say, gcc49 materials as the so-called "host" compiler tools I have not yet found a way around using the workaround: > # ls -l

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

In message <20160402105503.7ede5be1.ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, "O. Hartmann" writes: > --Sig_/VIBPN0rbNwuyJuk=dxEGA+U > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Am Sat, 02 Apr 2016 01:07:55 -0700 > Cy Schubert

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

In message <20160402113910.14de7eaf.ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, "O. Hartmann" writes: > --Sig_/cnPyYwlIcD24/.m6dd2EX7j > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Am Sat, 2 Apr 2016 10:55:03 +0200 > "O. Hartmann"

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

In message <56f6c6b0.6010...@protected-networks.net>, Michael Butler writes: > -current is not great for interactive use at all. The strategy of > pre-emptively dropping idle processes to swap is hurting .. big time. FreeBSD doesn't "preemptively" or arbitrarily push pages out to disk. LRU

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

Am Sat, 02 Apr 2016 01:07:55 -0700 Cy Schubert schrieb: > In message <56f6c6b0.6010...@protected-networks.net>, Michael Butler writes: > > -current is not great for interactive use at all. The strategy of > > pre-emptively dropping idle processes to swap is hurting ..

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released!

Sorry, Just to Ask a newbie question, is this a newest version of FreeBSD ? Or it's April 1 ... ?? Best regards, Chan > On 2 Apr 2016, at 12:29 AM, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Hi, > > At Nginx, we are committed to supporting a wide range of > BSD-like operating systems and

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released!

Am Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:15:31 +0800 Ccs189 schrieb: > Sorry, > Just to Ask a newbie question, is this a newest version of FreeBSD ? Or it's > April > 1 ... ?? > > Best regards, > Chan ;-) Back to the '90s > > > > On 2 Apr 2016, at 12:29 AM, Ruslan Ermilov

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

In message <201603300728.u2u7sdwc092...@gw.catspoiler.org>, Don Lewis writes: > On 29 Mar, To: ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: > > On 28 Mar, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 28 Mar, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > >> If I get a chance, I try booting my FreeBSD 11 machine with less RAM to > >> see if that

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

Am Sat, 2 Apr 2016 10:55:03 +0200 "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > Am Sat, 02 Apr 2016 01:07:55 -0700 > Cy Schubert schrieb: > > > In message <56f6c6b0.6010...@protected-networks.net>, Michael Butler > > writes: > > > -current is not great for

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

In message <56f6c6b0.6010...@protected-networks.net>, Michael Butler writes: > -current is not great for interactive use at all. The strategy of > pre-emptively dropping idle processes to swap is hurting .. big time. > > Compare inactive memory to swap in this example .. > > 110 processes: 1

Re: /usr/bin/make segmentation fault

Roger Marquis wrote: > Don't know how to debug this and cannot post the Makefile in question but it Can you provide something similar that triggers the issue? It's rather hard to tell what's wrong without knowing what *should* be happening. > last worked in 8.4. In

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

Am Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:39:10 +0200 "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > Am Sat, 2 Apr 2016 10:55:03 +0200 > "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > > > Am Sat, 02 Apr 2016 01:07:55 -0700 > > Cy Schubert schrieb: > > > > > In message