Re: NFSv4 performance degradation with 12.0-CURRENT client

2016-11-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:17:25PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p12 server exporting its home > directories over both NFSv3 and NFSv4. I have a TrueOS client (based > on 12.0-CURRENT on the drm-next-4.7 branch, built on 28-October) > mounting the home directories over

Re: Optimising generated rules for SAT solving (5/12 are duplicates)

2016-11-24 Thread Vsevolod Stakhov
On 23/11/2016 16:27, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi Hans, > > 2016-11-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Hans Petter Selasky : >> I've made a patch to hopefully optimise SAT solving in our pkg utility. > > Nice! Do you by any chance have any numbers that show the performance > improvements made by this change? Assuming

Re: NFSv4 performance degradation with 12.0-CURRENT client

2016-11-24 Thread Rick Macklem
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:17:25PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p12 server exporting its home > directories over both NFSv3 and NFSv4. I have a TrueOS client (based > on 12.0-CURRENT on the drm-next-4.7 branch, built on 28-October) > mounting the home directories over

Re: Optimising generated rules for SAT solving (5/12 are duplicates)

2016-11-24 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 11/24/16 13:13, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: On 23/11/2016 16:27, Ed Schouten wrote: Hi Hans, 2016-11-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Hans Petter Selasky : I've made a patch to hopefully optimise SAT solving in our pkg utility. Nice! Do you by any chance have any numbers that show the performance improveme

Re: Optimising generated rules for SAT solving (5/12 are duplicates)

2016-11-24 Thread Vsevolod Stakhov
On 24/11/2016 13:05, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 11/24/16 13:13, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: >> On 23/11/2016 16:27, Ed Schouten wrote: >>> Hi Hans, >>> >>> 2016-11-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Hans Petter Selasky : I've made a patch to hopefully optimise SAT solving in our pkg utility. >>> >>> Nice! Do

Re: Optimising generated rules for SAT solving (5/12 are duplicates)

2016-11-24 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 11/24/16 14:05, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: the non-patched version wants to reinstall 1 package. Spelling: patched version wants to reinstall 1 package only. --HPS ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list

Re: Optimising generated rules for SAT solving (5/12 are duplicates)

2016-11-24 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 11/24/16 14:11, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: On 24/11/2016 13:05, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 11/24/16 13:13, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: On 23/11/2016 16:27, Ed Schouten wrote: Hi Hans, 2016-11-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Hans Petter Selasky : I've made a patch to hopefully optimise SAT solving in our p

Re: Optimising generated rules for SAT solving (5/12 are duplicates)

2016-11-24 Thread Ed Schouten
2016-11-24 13:13 GMT+01:00 Vsevolod Stakhov : > On 23/11/2016 16:27, Ed Schouten wrote: >> Hi Hans, >> >> 2016-11-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Hans Petter Selasky : >>> I've made a patch to hopefully optimise SAT solving in our pkg utility. >> >> Nice! Do you by any chance have any numbers that show the perf

Re: NFSv4 performance degradation with 12.0-CURRENT client

2016-11-24 Thread Alan Somers
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:17:25PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: >> I have a FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p12 server exporting its home >> directories over both NFSv3 and NFSv4. I have a TrueOS client (based >> on 12.0-CURRENT on the drm-next-4.7 branc

Re: NFSv4 performance degradation with 12.0-CURRENT client

2016-11-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:17:25PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > >> I have a FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p12 server exporting its home > >> directories over both NFSv3 and NFSv4. I h

Re: NFSv4 performance degradation with 12.0-CURRENT client

2016-11-24 Thread Rick Macklem
asom...@gmail.com wrote: [stuff snipped] >I've reproduced the issue on stock FreeBSD 12, and I've also learned >that nullfs is a required factor. Doing the buildworld directly on >the NFS mount doesn't cause any slowdown, but doing a buildworld on >the nullfs copy of the NFS mount does. The slowd