Re: [RFC/RFT] projects/ipsec

2017-01-09 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:18, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: So, if there will no objection, I'll merge projects/ipsec into head/ within two weeks. I still keep seeing almost daily changes to the branch and am having a hard time to convince myself to do a proper review that way. I would very much pre

Re: [RFC/RFT] projects/ipsec

2017-01-09 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 09.01.2017 14:38, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:18, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: So, if there will no objection, I'll merge projects/ipsec into head/ within two weeks. I still keep seeing almost daily changes to the branch and am having a hard time to convince myself to do a prop

onboard wifi raspberry pi3 and aarch64/freebsd-current

2017-01-09 Thread tech-lists
Hello lists, [x-posted to freebsd-arm because this question appears to be equally relevant there] Does the onboard wireless on the raspberry pi 3 work in 12-current-aarch64? If not, are there plans afoot to make it work? many thanks, -- J. ___ freebs

MANPATH not handled correctly

2017-01-09 Thread Steve Kargl
MANPATH is not handled correctly. According to the documentation in apropos(1) and whatis(1): MANPATH The standard search path used by man(1) may be changed by specifying a path in the MANPATH environment variable. Invalid paths, or paths without manual databases, are

Re: onboard wifi raspberry pi3 and aarch64/freebsd-current

2017-01-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
hi! no, and maybe. -a On 9 January 2017 at 05:30, tech-lists wrote: > Hello lists, > > [x-posted to freebsd-arm because this question appears to be equally > relevant there] > > Does the onboard wireless on the raspberry pi 3 work in 12-current-aarch64? > > If not, are there plans afoot to ma

Re: New Lock Order Reversal in 12.0?

2017-01-09 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:31:39AM +, Anindya Mukherjee wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for your reply, and yes, I did notice #238. I should say at this point > that I'm a newbie when it comes to kernel code and am trying to learn about > it (hence current). Understood. It's good that you are

RE: New Lock Order Reversal in 12.0?

2017-01-09 Thread Anindya Mukherjee
Good, that makes me feel better :) The system is running fine, so I think you're right and it's nothing to worry about. Thanks again for your responses. Best, Anindya From: Benjamin Kaduk [ka...@mit.edu] Sent: January 9, 2017 1:53 PM To: Anindya Mukherjee

Re: MANPATH not handled correctly

2017-01-09 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Steve Kargl wrote: > MANPATH is not handled correctly. According to the documentation > in apropos(1) and whatis(1): Can you clarify where you are seeing this documentation? I don't see it in 7.x 10.x or current. Eg, in 10.2 apropos(1) says only: ENVIRONMENT The following environment var

Re: HEADS-UP: IFLIB implementations of sys/dev/e1000 em, lem, igb pending

2017-01-09 Thread Sean Bruno
tl;dir --> you get to keep your igbX devices(thanks jhb), no POLA violations this week. I've updated sys/dev/e1000 at svn R311849 to match Matt Macy's work on IFLIB in the kernel. At this point, the driver deviates from Intel's code dramatically and you now get to yell directly into the freebsd-n

Re: MANPATH not handled correctly

2017-01-09 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 05:19:01PM -0800, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > MANPATH is not handled correctly. According to the documentation > > > in apropos(1) and whatis(1): > > > > Can you clarify where you are seeing this documentation? > > I do