Re: r314708: panic: tdsendsignal: ksi on queue

2017-03-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:11:51AM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > This patch introduces a subtle correctness bug. A real SIGCHLD ksiginfo > should always be the zombie's p_ksi; otherwise, the siginfo may be lost > if there are too many signals pending for the target process or in the > system. If

Re: start-up failure at SVN r314889

2017-03-10 Thread Eric Camachat
It works, thank you! On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Michael Butler wrote: > Per Hans .. this should fix it: > > r314953 | hselasky | 2017-03-09 04:17:43 -0500 (Thu, 09 Mar 2017) | 9 lines > Changed paths: >M /head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_work.c > >

Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:24:52PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 16:25:17 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 02:52:09PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > > Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 15:07:54 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017

Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-10 Thread Alexandre Martins
Le vendredi 10 mars 2017, 16:46:26 Konstantin Belousov a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:30:21PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > Le vendredi 10 mars 2017, 15:57:16 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:24:52PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > > > Le jeudi 9

Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-10 Thread Alexandre Martins
Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 16:25:17 Konstantin Belousov a écrit : > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 02:52:09PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 15:07:54 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:59:27AM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > > > I have the save

Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-10 Thread Alexandre Martins
Le vendredi 10 mars 2017, 15:57:16 Konstantin Belousov a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:24:52PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 16:25:17 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 02:52:09PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > > > Le jeudi 9 mars

Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 04:23:02PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > Le vendredi 10 mars 2017, 16:46:26 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:30:21PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > > Le vendredi 10 mars 2017, 15:57:16 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > > > On Fri, Mar

Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:30:21PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > Le vendredi 10 mars 2017, 15:57:16 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:24:52PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > > Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 16:25:17 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > > > On Thu, Mar 09,

Re: input/output error @boot

2017-03-10 Thread Chris H
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 06:00:23 + Dexuan Cui wrote > Hi Roberto, > Thanks for sending me your memmap and this is a temporary workaround > patch for you: > https://github.com/dcui/freebsd/commit/0edd1db55fbbb56352d6024250e4ae7dd8ad31 > e3.patch > > I put the memmap info

Re: MANPATH not handled correctly

2017-03-10 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 11:26:33AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > MANPATH is not handled correctly. According to the documentation > in apropos(1) and whatis(1): > > MANPATH The standard search path used by man(1) may be changed by > specifying a path in the MANPATH environment

Re: MANPATH not handled correctly

2017-03-10 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 07:34:40AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 11:26:33AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > MANPATH is not handled correctly. According to the documentation > > in apropos(1) and whatis(1): > > (snip) > > Sorry it took time, but it is now fixed. the