r320307 -> r320324: kernel does not load

2017-06-25 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hi All, I use self-built base packages for system updates. The jump from r320307 to r320324 leads to fatal trap 12 at the very beginning: https://goo.gl/Pgujga (sorry for the poor photo quality) Revert to r320307, and the system boots fine. -- WBR, bsam _

Re: r320307 -> r320324: kernel does not load

2017-06-25 Thread Boris Samorodov
(cc: kib@) Hi Kostik, FYI: I've looked though last source changes and it looks like your commit(s) may be related. 25.06.2017 13:54, Boris Samorodov пишет: > Hi All, > > I use self-built base packages for system updates. The jump from > r320307 to r320324 leads to fatal trap 12 at the very begi

Insta-panic for amd64 on reboot after upgrade from r320307 -> r320324

2017-06-25 Thread David Wolfskill
Both on laptop and build machine; fortunately for me, the latter has a serial console, so: __ _ _ | | | _ \ / | __ \ | |___ _ __ ___ ___ | |_) | (___ | | | | | ___| '__/ _ \/ _ \| _ < \___ \| | | | | | | | | __/ __/| |_) |__

Re: Insta-panic for amd64 on reboot after upgrade from r320307 -> r320324

2017-06-25 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 05:07:31AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > fault virtual address = 0x120 This is clearly an impossible address. Did you built the kernel with NO_CLEAN ? If yes, try the full build, perhaps

Re: Insta-panic for amd64 on reboot after upgrade from r320307 -> r320324

2017-06-25 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 03:32:26PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 05:07:31AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > > fault virtual address = 0x120 > This is clearly an impossible address.

Re: Insta-panic for amd64 on reboot after upgrade from r320307 -> r320324

2017-06-25 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 05:47:48AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 03:32:26PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 05:07:31AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > > > fault

Re: Insta-panic for amd64 on reboot after upgrade from r320307 -> r320324

2017-06-25 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 03:52:23PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > ... > > > The layout of the struct vm_map_entry was changed, the faulted address > > > is somewhat consistent with ABI mismatch. > > > > Kinky. :-} > Do you use any third-party modules ? On the laptop, I use x11/nvidia-driver-

Re: Insta-panic for amd64 on reboot after upgrade from r320307 -> r320324

2017-06-25 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 06:05:21AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 03:52:23PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > ... > > > > The layout of the struct vm_map_entry was changed, the faulted address > > > > is somewhat consistent with ABI mismatch. > > > > > > Kinky. :-} >

Re: Current amd64 new error or warning from today's current with ruby r320323

2017-06-25 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 07:19:25PM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > > > On Jun 24, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Konstantin Belousov > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 06:48:03PM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > >> > >>> On Jun 24, 2017, at 6:23 PM, Konstantin Belousov > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sat

Re: Insta-panic for amd64 on reboot after upgrade from r320307 -> r320324

2017-06-25 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 04:21:16PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > ... > > #cat /etc/src-env.conf > > WITH_META_MODE=yes > > So can you _remove_ all kernel object files and rebuild anew with the > clean build dir, please ? OK; that seems to have resulted in a kernel that boots to multi-user

Re: Current amd64 new error or warning from today's current with ruby r320323

2017-06-25 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:41+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 07:19:25PM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > > > > > On Jun 24, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Konstantin Belousov > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 06:48:03PM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Jun

Re: Current amd64 new error or warning from today's current with ruby r320323

2017-06-25 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:18+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:41+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 07:19:25PM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Konstantin Belousov > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 24

Re: Current amd64 new error or warning from today's current with ruby r320323

2017-06-25 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:56+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:18+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > > On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:41+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 07:19:25PM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 2017, at 7:04 PM

Re: Current amd64 new error or warning from today's current with ruby r320323

2017-06-25 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 18:08+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:56+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > > On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:18+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:41+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 07:19:25PM -070

Re: Current amd64 new error or warning from today's current with ruby r320323

2017-06-25 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:21:33AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > > > On Jun 25, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Konstantin Belousov > > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:43:25AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > >> maybe message got reformatted in mail program (mac mail). > >> could you send me a tar fil

Re: Current amd64 new error or warning from today's current with ruby r320323

2017-06-25 Thread Manfred Antar
> On Jun 25, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:21:33AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: >> >>> On Jun 25, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Konstantin Belousov >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:43:25AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: maybe message got reform

Re: Current amd64 new error or warning from today's current with ruby r320323

2017-06-25 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:09:07AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > > > On Jun 25, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Konstantin Belousov > > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:21:33AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > >> > >>> On Jun 25, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Konstantin Belousov > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sun

Re: Current amd64 new error or warning from today's current with ruby r320323

2017-06-25 Thread Manfred Antar
> On Jun 25, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:09:07AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: >> >>> On Jun 25, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Konstantin Belousov >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:21:33AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > On Jun 25, 2017,

Skylake/Kabylake Intel Bug?

2017-06-25 Thread Pete Wright
Came across this post today via HN regarding a issue with Hyperthreading causing unpredictable behavior on these CPU's https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/06/msg00308.html I really wish there was more info on this in the email, for example examples of programs being effected by this bug

Re: Current amd64 new error or warning from today's current with ruby r320323

2017-06-25 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:41+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:21:33AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > > > > > On Jun 25, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Konstantin Belousov > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:43:25AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > > >> maybe message go

Has gdb been disconnected from make installworld?

2017-06-25 Thread Trond Endrestøl
I was at bit surprised to see gdb missing from /usr/bin this evening. The executables are still being built in /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb. This is on base/head r320329. Do we need to add WITH_GDB=yes to our src.conf files? -- +---+-

Re: Has gdb been disconnected from make installworld?

2017-06-25 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:55+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > I was at bit surprised to see gdb missing from /usr/bin this evening. > The executables are still being built in /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb. > > This is on base/head r320329. > > Do we need to add WITH_GDB=yes to our src.conf files?

Re: Current amd64 new error or warning from today's current with ruby r320323

2017-06-25 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:51:07PM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: > > https://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/vm2.2.patch > > This patch made ruby23 happy on my end. Can't say the same for > emacs-nox11 or temacs while building the former. What exactly do you mean ? Explain the behaviour and show t

Re: Has gdb been disconnected from make installworld?

2017-06-25 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 09:03:58PM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:55+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > > I was at bit surprised to see gdb missing from /usr/bin this evening. > > The executables are still being built in /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb. > > > > This is on

Re: Insta-panic for amd64 on reboot after upgrade from r320307 -> r320324

2017-06-25 Thread Boris Samorodov
25.06.2017 16:21, Konstantin Belousov пишет: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 06:05:21AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 03:52:23PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> ... > The layout of the struct vm_map_entry was changed, the faulted address > is somewhat consistent w

Re: Skylake/Kabylake Intel Bug?

2017-06-25 Thread A. Wilcox
On 25/06/17 12:56, Pete Wright wrote: > Came across this post today via HN regarding a issue with Hyperthreading > causing unpredictable behavior on these CPU's > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/06/msg00308.html > > I really wish there was more info on this in the email, for example

ZFS ABD Panic

2017-06-25 Thread Shawn Webb
This is on the latest HardenedBSD 12-CURRENT on one of my servers: [141] panic: sleepq_add: td 0xf80008d20560 to sleep on wchan 0xf803b7d4e810 with sleeping prohibited [141] cpuid = 5 [141] time = 1498436043 [141] KDB: stack backtrace: [141] db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrappe

Re: Skylake/Kabylake Intel Bug?

2017-06-25 Thread Pete Wright
On 06/25/2017 14:53, A. Wilcox wrote: On 25/06/17 12:56, Pete Wright wrote: Came across this post today via HN regarding a issue with Hyperthreading causing unpredictable behavior on these CPU's https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/06/msg00308.html I really wish there was more info on

Re: Ports still broken by ino64?

2017-06-25 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, valgrind broke as part of the ino64 work :( -a ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [RESOLVED] Failover Mode Between Ethernet and Wireless Interfaces broken on >= 11

2017-06-25 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:22:46PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > I fixed the rc.conf snippet in the handbook in r50399. > I lost track of the rest of the thread as to what needs to be > changed in the actual command examples in lagg.4 and/or the > handbook, though. To be clear, that is: one of yo

status of and/or url to check base packages repo somewhere?

2017-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
As the Subject: is there a canonical url to check, and a procedure in place yet, to, for instance, if one cannot buildworld on 12.0-CURRENT, to access the package .txz or whatever and 'pkg fetch ... pkg add ...' which would substitute for the buildworld cycle? Also, one would be rebooted

Re: Ports still broken by ino64?

2017-06-25 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Adrian Chadd: > valgrind broke as part of the ino64 work :( Valgrind was not on my mind! Your post sent me to ls -d /usr/ports/*/val* to find valgrind, and then read the pkg-descr. One less tool for getting debugging information when something crashes? Tom