Re: posix_fallocate on ZFS

On 10/02/2018 20:43, Ian Lepore wrote: On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 11:24 -0700, Alan Somers wrote: On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: Hi, This has been disabled on ZFS since last November. And I do understand the rationale on this. BUT I've now upgraded some of my HEAD

Re: posix_fallocate on ZFS

On 11/02/2018 00:10, Alan Somers wrote: On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Willem Jan Withagen > wrote: On 10/02/2018 20:43, Ian Lepore wrote: On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 11:24 -0700, Alan Somers wrote: On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:28

Re: posix_fallocate on ZFS

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > On 10/02/2018 20:43, Ian Lepore wrote: > >> On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 11:24 -0700, Alan Somers wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Willem Jan Withagen >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, This has been

Re: VIMAGE: vnet, epair and lots of jails on bridgeX - routing

On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 08:52:21 +0100 "O. Hartmann" wrote: > Am Fri, 09 Feb 2018 16:43:17 + > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" schrieb: > > > On 9 Feb 2018, at 16:22, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > > Am Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:31:15 +0100 > > > "O. Hartmann"

Lua Loader changes posted

I'm at a good point in the lua loader, so I've posted changed to https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14295 for review. It works great in the userboot.so loader test harness, but I've not booted this on real hardware yet, so anyone wanting to take it for a spin be sure you have an old-working loader or

posix_fallocate on ZFS

Hi, This has been disabled on ZFS since last November. And I do understand the rationale on this. BUT I've now upgraded some of my HEAD Ceph test systems and they now fail, since Ceph uses posix_fallocate() to allocate space for the FileStore-journal. Is there any expectation that this is

Re: posix_fallocate on ZFS

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Hi, > > This has been disabled on ZFS since last November. > And I do understand the rationale on this. > > BUT > > I've now upgraded some of my HEAD Ceph test systems and they now fail, > since Ceph uses

Re: VIMAGE: vnet, epair and lots of jails on bridgeX - routing

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 8:52 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > > The moment any of the bridges gets an additional member epair interface > (so the bridge > has at least three members including the on reaching into the virtual > router jail) the > vbridge seems to operate

Re: posix_fallocate on ZFS

On 10/02/2018 19:24, Alan Somers wrote: On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Willem Jan Withagen > wrote: Hi, This has been disabled on ZFS since last November. And I do understand the rationale on this. BUT I've now upgraded some

Re: posix_fallocate on ZFS

In article , asom...@freebsd.org writes: >On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Willem Jan Withagen >wrote: >> Is there any expectation that this is going to fixed in any near future? >No. It's fundamentally

Re: posix_fallocate on ZFS

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > On 10/02/2018 19:24, Alan Somers wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Willem Jan Withagen > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> This has been disabled on ZFS since

Re: posix_fallocate on ZFS

On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 11:24 -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Willem Jan Withagen > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > This has been disabled on ZFS since last November. > > And I do understand the rationale on this. > > > > BUT > > > > I've now upgraded some of my HEAD

Re: posix_fallocate on ZFS

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 11:24 -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Willem Jan Withagen > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This has been disabled on ZFS since last November. > > > And I do

Re: posix_fallocate on ZFS

On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 12:45 -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 11:24 -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Willem Jan Withagen > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >