Resending with the patch as an attachment.
Drew
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024, at 11:39 AM, Drew Gallatin wrote:
> I don't have the full context, but it seems like the complaint is a
> performance regression in bonnie++ and perhaps other things when tcp_hpts is
> loaded, even when it is not used. Is
> On 17. Mar 2024, at 16:39, Drew Gallatin wrote:
>
> I don't have the full context, but it seems like the complaint is a
> performance regression in bonnie++ and perhaps other things when tcp_hpts is
> loaded, even when it is not used. Is that correct?
Correct.
>
> If so, I suspect its
I don't have the full context, but it seems like the complaint is a performance
regression in bonnie++ and perhaps other things when tcp_hpts is loaded, even
when it is not used. Is that correct?
If so, I suspect its because we drive the tcp_hpts_softclock() routine from
userret(), in order
Hello,
> I don't have the full context, but it seems like the complaint is a
> performance regression in bonnie++ and perhaps other things when tcp_hpts is
> loaded, even when it is not used. Is that correct?
>
> If so, I suspect its because we drive the tcp_hpts_softclock() routine from
>
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 11:40:54 -0400
"Drew Gallatin" wrote:
> Resending with the patch as an attachment.
>
> Drew
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024, at 11:39 AM, Drew Gallatin wrote:
> > I don't have the full context, but it seems like the complaint is a
> > performance regression in bonnie++ and
> On 16. Mar 2024, at 21:29, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
>> Just to double check: you only load the tcp_rack. You don't run
>> sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=rack
>
> I'm not using sysctl, just loading module.
And you also don't have
net.inet.tcp.functions_default=rack
in /etc/sysctl.conf
Hello,
> > - I can't remember better tests to do as I can feel the entire OS is
> > being slow, without errors, just slow.
> This is interesting. It seems a consequence on loading TCPHPTS, not actually
> using it.
Exactly, just loading module and not using it by setting sysctl.
> I have CCed
