On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 07:09:58PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
Although function calls are more expensive than inline code,
they aren't necessarily a lot more so, and function calls to
non-locked RMW operations are certainly much cheaper than
inline locked RMW operations.
This is a fairly
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
This is no longer necessary (in fact it causes much confusion for the
driver). The correct declaration for a pnp soundcard is 'device pcm0'.
How do you set flags for particular cards, now? I used to have
to use the flags option to
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 01:41:41PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 01:29:40AM +1000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Before attempting to build world, you must make and install a new
kernel. The new kernel will contain new syscalls that are needed during
build world. doscmd is
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 12:13:32PM +0200, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
The problem
---
When doing a make world, tools are being built that are used by the
build process. This is to make sure that the tools are appropriate for
doing a make world. The problem we now face is that the
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 03:36:11PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
But this still doesn't entirely solve the problem. You still have
to build and install a new kernel before installing the world.
Of course! Installing the world _is_ upgrading your operating
system. I don't see anyone
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:24:50PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Dillon writes:
: complex. For example, using fixed-length FIFOs rather then linked lists.
: The writer manipulates the write index variable, the reader manipulates
: the read index
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 11:17:15PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Once per day the machine cvsups, checks out a virgin source tree,
tries to build GENERIC, GENERIC98, LINT and world. If any of these
builds fail it will send a report like this.
On Sundays the report will always be sent.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 07:23:00PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Chris Piazza wrote:
It's working from my 5.0 box to my 4.0-R box across town, too.
-Chris
Thanks. There's one data point. Now it's evidently nothing in the
code, as it fails exactly the
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 01:25:20AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andrew Reilly" writes:
: Have you got "X11Forwarding yes"
Ahem. "ForwardX11 yes" is what's documented and is known to work.
Bzzzt. Man sshd(8):
X11Forwarding
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 06:36:14PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Warner Losh writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mitsuru IWASAKI writes:
: Maybe I'm wrong because of lack of my understanding on crush dump and
: loader. Please help us :-)
I think that you
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:01:46PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andrew Reilly" writes:
: That sounds way too hard. Why not restrict suspend activity to
: user-level processes and bring the kernel/drivers back up through
: a regular boot process? At leas
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:30:55PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:16:08AM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
(*) Speaking of which: why are we considering doing process
dumps into a _different_ swap-ish partition, instead of just
ensuring that all processes are sleeping
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:40:30PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
The real issue here is persistent system state across the S4 suspend; ie.
leaving applications open, etc. IMO this isn't really something worth a
lot of effort to us, and it has a lot of additional complications for a
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 12:47:38PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bjoern Fischer writes:
: Just a moment. You talk about doing a `Save-to-Disk' (incl. system halt),
: turning power off, maybe adding some hardware or moving the machine
: to another location, then
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 08:40:44PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Jun Kuriyama wrote:
And we should keep that master text simple to ease modification by
hackers. If we force to write complex markups, hackers will *forget*
to update that master text. :-)
I'm not sure I would *forget*
On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 08:29:23AM -0400, Nathan Binkert wrote:
The patch does work for client side. I have verified that I can connect
to a windows server using chap v2, but I forgot to do something for
server. Shouldn't take me long. If you need the server part before
Brian gets back,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 10:54:44PM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
However, note that you need to move LOCALBASE and X11BASE for *all*
ports, not one. (For instance, you can't expect an emacs-lisp package
to install correctly if you just try to move it while emacs is still
in
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 05:19:34PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
So I'm a bit stumped as far as formulating an easy How-To-Repeat is
concerned. :-(
How about wedging a printenv into the makefile, before the call
to awk, so that you can re-create the environment when testing
it?
--
Andrew
To
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 12:31:10PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
Not /usr/local - that's for locally maintained software. I'd rather it
go on /usr, so I don't like /opt. When I got to choose, I chose
/usr/opt. But anything other than /usr/local on /usr would do as well.
So do you also put the
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 09:46:46PM -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
Fixing broken things is a good thing. Your argument about moving it
from /usr/local to show how broken is a good test procedure, but turning
it into policy is something completely different.
I think the 'tradition' of FreeBSD
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:24:14PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
Why?
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:50:08AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
For the people wanting to turn on write caching ... it WILL break
the write ordering needed by softupdates and journaling filesystems,
so don't do it unless you know what you're doing.
I guess it would be better to do this kind
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:25:57PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
as part of my netmap investigations, i was looking at how
expensive are memory copies, and here are a couple of findings
(first one is obvious, the second one less so)
Most C compilers (well, the ones I regularly use) inline small,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
you think so? judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact
imo.
On Linux. Have you ever seen those sorts of UI problems on FreeBSD? I don't
watch much video on my systems, but I haven't seen that. FreeBSD has
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 04:24:41PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chuck Robey
writes:
: I would think using a fixed order would be a really bad thing, causing
: overload of the first server in line. Did I misunderstand you?
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 06:53:51PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
Since the hostname is simply a plain-text token for the IP address, it
has to remain bound to the IP address (whether that binding is fixed or
dynamic is outside the scope of this discussion). Having a hostname that
doesn't map
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 01:04:27PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
and the like. On a recent -current snap, this returns
ufs:fd0a
I used the previous behaviour in picobsd's rc to mount
the file system from the boot device,
set `df /` ; dev="/dev/$8"
echo
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 12:48:53AM -0500, Jim Bloom wrote:
I have been using cpp on my firewall to expand my local firewall rules and fill
in the local address and subnetmask. This makes things easier my ISP decides to
change my IP address using DHCP. My firewall is running an approximately
On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 02:55:27PM -0500, Anthony Kimball wrote:
: All I want is that a program gets NULL from malloc if there is no memory
: available. I find that to be a very fundamental thing about malloc.
: Do you have a solution? We don't.
Make an sbrk variant which will
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 05:23:38PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 05:20:57PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote:
i might have stumbled upon a problem with clang. i've compiled a kernel from
the clang branch using `make kernel INSTKERNNAME=clang` and booted from it.
i'm now
Hi all,
Sorry to interrupt this thread with an off-topic question, but
it seems vaguely related, and you folk seem to be the right ones
to ask:
I've recently done a drive upgrade in a 1U rack machine that
only had space for the two active drives that were in it, and I
couldn't afford the
Hi all,
I'm not sure if it's related (I get my src via csup, so I don't
have svn reveision numbers), but I upgraded about 16 hours ago
again a few hours after that, and my two-core AMD64 system has
been (seemingly) quite unstable. I've had a few boot cycles
that have failed and dumped me out
Hi Kip,
Sorry for the delay: it's been a tussle...
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 04:42:12PM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
Does FBSDID get expanded when checking out with csup?
Looks like it:
__FBSDID($FreeBSD: head/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c 207452 2010-04-30
22:31:37Z kmacy $);
My version says:
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 04:34:53PM +0100, Dom Mitchell wrote:
On 7 June 1999, Ben Rosengart proclaimed:
I am curious as to why tcp_wrappers are present in /usr/src/contrib as
well as in the ports collection. Can someone please enlighten me? TIA.
To support 2.2.x users?
Maybe 3.x users
Just to prefix with my config:
FreeBSD duncan.reilly.home 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #7: Sat May 29
11:20:54 EST 2010 r...@duncan.reilly.home:/nb/obj/nb/src/sys/DUNCAN amd64
Current source tree was csupped about half an hour ago.
I don't think that my hardware has gone dodgy:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 16:30:04 +0300
Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
Have you been playing with clang or other alternative compilers?
I have them all installed, but none are used by the build
process. My make.conf is relatively clean.
If not, then I think that it's your hardware.
I did
On Mon, 31 May 2010 21:17:41 -0700
Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
What _is_ your make.conf though?
Just this:
#CC=clang
CFLAGS+=-g
CXXFLAGS+=-g
KERNCONF=DUNCAN
NO_LPR=YES
NO_SENDMAIL=YES
WITH_GTK2=yes
WITH_CUPS=yes
WITH_GECKO=libxul
#WITH_DEBUG=yes
A4=yes
QT4_OPTIONS=CUPS NAS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 May 2010 17:01:15 +0100
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
Is it really such a bad thing to have gcc as a build-dependency
for various ported applications?
There are already ports that have gcc-4.4.4 as a dependency,
Hi Garrett,
On Mon, 31 May 2010 21:36:23 -0700
Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok... there appear to be some interesting bits here, but I'm
curious... when was the last time that you did a build with clang, and
did you properly clean out /usr/obj, etc since your last compile?
I
I've been trying on-and-off for weeks, and haven't been able to
crack it. The configure script goes looking for Kerberos 5 and
can't find it, even though it's in the base.
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi there,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 06:57:56AM +0800, Buganini wrote:
I'm using it without problem,
do you have any of *_HEIMDAL or *_KERBEROS in make.conf/src.conf?
No. The problem, as far as I can tell, is that the search for
krb5 in the configure script tests three options, (mit, heimdal
and
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:23:37AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
in /etc/src.conf - WITHOUT_LPR=yes
and these symbolic links in /usr/bin
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 Mar 18 2009 /usr/bin/lp -
/usr/local/bin/lp
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 24 Mar 18 2009 /usr/bin/lpoptions -
Hi Kostik,
On 06/07/2010, at 18:54 , Kostik Belousov wrote:
You need to gather and show exact command that fails.
There's some a little more info in PR: ports/145769, although the fix that I
suggest there is almost certainly a wrong turn (I nuked all reference to MD2_*
from libhx509, there).
Hi Kostik,
On 06/07/2010, at 22:33 , Kostik Belousov wrote:
Install evolution-data-server as a reference to the command is a sure way
to not get any help.
Why, because no-one uses ports?
I asked for explicit command that fails, PR does not contain this information.
It is not even clear
Hi Kostik,
Thanks for looking at this,
On 06/07/2010, at 23:46 , Kostik Belousov wrote:
Ok, this is useful. But, on the HEAD from Jul 2, I cannot reproduce it,
with conftest.c and command line above. As well as on the stable/8 that
is approx. one month old.
On both systems, MD2_* symbols
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 06/07/2010 15:14:28, Andrew Reilly wrote:
So: how should I fix this, properly, on my -current system? Is it
as simple as installing heimdal from ports? I can't remove openssl-1.0:
that has 191 ports listed in its REQUIRED_BY
Hi there,
I've been providing a light-use samba server on my
freebsd-current box, mostly for secondary storage my wife's
laptop. It's worked mostly-fine for a dozen years. I've never
seen anything like this before, and am not sure where to start
poking it. Here's the output of netstat and ps,
blockage I
wasn't receiving any mail (via fetchmail -- local qmail smtp
server), but had no trouble connecting to the system over ssh,
or doing most other things.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 06:50:25PM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
This is on:
FreeBSD duncan.reilly.home 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:15:55PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
got any other suggestions?
This is very much a sorry I asked question, but is none-the
less quite a good one, given the size of the hole to be plugged.
I think that a reasonable answer for this sort of thing might be
one of the
Hi Luigi,
On 19/08/2010, at 00:28 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
slightly off topic but I disagree on the latter part.
I didn't expect everyone to agree. Not sure that I do, necessarily, either.
(A neat, small language like TCL or Lua is probably better for most of the uses
we're discussing here.)
I didn't want to prolong this now mostly off-topic discussion
too much, but:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:00:54PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
+1 for a scheme shell, but not for the heavy-weight variety that
compiles to C, as that would tie them to a subset of ${ARCH}es.
Why do you say that? Most
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:40:37PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Will have to disagree on that - part of the point of having such a
thing would be to attract young developers, and while the CS crowd
will be happy with LISP, anyone starting programming after the first
.com bubble will probably be
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 02:27:40AM +0800, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> I'd love to see if RISC-V is vulnerable to this?
>
> I think they are in the best position to capitalize on this clusterfk...
It's a micro-architecture flaw, not an instruction set flaw, so
just as for ARM and amd64, it will
Hi,
I do a weekly build to track changes, on 12-current since I gave my fileserver
this new Ryzen motherboard a few months ago. I switched to current because
there was some badness in 11-stable that I attributed to new processor
twitchiness (wouldn't reboot, temperature sensors not working.)
class=0x108000
cc_vegas.ko
The output above suggests that there isn't a driver attached to that device
anyway, though.
Cheers,
Andrew Reilly
> On 18 Feb 2018, at 00:06 , Hans Petter Selasky <h...@selasky.org> wrote:
>
> On 02/17/18 13:42, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>&
g, but should at
> least get you a booting system (assuming the new code from r331347 is
> really triggering a problem).
>
>
> I’ll take another look to see if I missed something in the commit. But, at
> the moment, I’m hard-pressed to see how r331347 would cause the problem y
>
>Warner
>
>On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Reilly <arei...@bigpond.net.au>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> For reasons that still escape me, I haven't been able to get a kernel
>dump
>> to debug, sorry.
>>
>> Just thought that I'd
in an unexpected state, perhaps? That change (r331070) by cem@
is just a few revisions after the one that is working for me. I'll start
looking there...
Cheers,
Andrew
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 07:49:17AM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> Hi Warner,
>
> The breakage was in 331470, and at least on
my kernel is panicking
long before any network activity happens.
Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Andrew
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 05:23:18PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> Thanks Andrew... I can't recreate this on my VM nor my real hardware.
>
> Warner
>
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 5:2
my kernel is panicking
long before any network activity happens.
Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Andrew
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 08:14:40AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> Also, what rev failed? I booted r331464 last night w/o issue.
>
> Warner
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Reill
Hi all,
For reasons that still escape me, I haven't been able to get a kernel dump to
debug, sorry.
Just thought that I'd generate a fairly low-quality report, to see if anyone
has some ideas.
The last kernel that I have that booted OK (and I'm now running) is:
FreeBSD Zen.ac-r.nu
61 matches
Mail list logo
