pam_mkhomedir

not exist. I know I need pam_mkhomedir for this but I can't find it under 5.1. If I remember, pam_mkhomedir was in the contrib section under 4.x. Any idea why it is not part of FreeBSD anymore ? Or do you know any other way of auto-creating users homedir ? Thanks in advance, Regards. - -- Antoine

Re: Upgrading to FreeBSD 5.1

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:13:30PM -0400, Didier Rwitura wrote: I am trying to upgrade my sysstem from 4.8-RELEASE-p4 to 5.1 and i getting this error message when I run make -j4 buildworld I had the same problem. Making without the -j4 option works however. Antoine

Re: OpenLDAP/nss_ldap/pam_ldap

On Tuesday 28 October 2003 23:52, Steve Lee wrote: I have gotten FreeBSD 5.1 to authenticate user remotely ssh ing to the box. They can log in, but when they log in, the system shows their userid instead of the username when you do a ps. this tells me something might be wrong with

Re: OpenLDAP/nss_ldap/pam_ldap

On Wednesday 29 October 2003 00:42, you wrote: I just checked the FreeBSD site and do not see any release 5.2 It is not release yet :) Once i can hurl this obsticle, i think FreeBSD might be a viable solution for me. Well, let be it then... I'm running -CURRENT with dynamic root and it works

Re: Palm syncing over USB on FreeBSD, any hopes?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 29 July 2003 19:24, Rajappa Iyer wrote: ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2 ucom0: init failed, STALLED device_probe_and_attach: ucom0 attach returned 6 Try this: http://www.lphp.org/popups/articleswindow.php?id=13

if_tun failed to register

kernel config file. Thanks in advance. -- Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lphp.org PGP/GnuPG key: http://www.lphp.org/ressources/ajacoutot.asc ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: if_tun failed to register

Max Laier wrote: AJ AJ module_register: module if_tun already exists! AJ Module if_tun failed to register: 17 AJ can't re-use a leaf (if_tun_debug)! AJ AJ Is there a kernel option I missed ? I

Re: if_tun failed to register

Matteo Riondato wrote: Well, it did not change anything :( What is really strange is that tun is compiled in the kernel, but the module is started anyway ??? I had the same problem last year and solved it by removing device tun from the kernel configuration file. Yes, I though about it. But

Re: if_tun failed to register

On Wednesday 05 November 2003 18:37, you wrote: It's been there for quite a while, I see that behaviour in 5.1-RELEASE, too. Thanks, I'm happy I'm not the only one seeing this :) It looks like ppp does not get compiled in the kernel either... :( Antoine

Re: if_tun failed to register

On Wednesday 05 November 2003 22:47, Brooks Davis wrote: Thanks, I'm happy I'm not the only one seeing this :) It looks like ppp does not get compiled in the kernel either... :( ppp(4) is in GENERIC. You just have to create the devices like: No ! Although tun and ppp are in GENERIC, they

Re: if_tun failed to register

On Wednesday 05 November 2003 23:07, Michael Nottebrock wrote: FWIW, tun _is_ in the kernel if you compile it in, but gets loaded a second time. The module which gets loaded isn't actually used. Hum, strange... :) Do you know if the lastest -CURRENT fixes that ? Antoine

Re: if_tun failed to register

On Wednesday 05 November 2003 23:25, Brian Lynn wrote: will be run at startup if you have any ifconfig_tun* lines in rc.conf. You can see if ifconfig is the culprit by booting single-user and doing ifconfig tun0 (it is only the first attempt that gives the error message in question). If so,

rpc.lockd core dumped

information but I didn't see where to find more debuging options for rpc.lockd. 5.1-CURRENT #0: Tue Nov 4 01:44:35 CET 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ obj/usr/src/sys/KERNSRV01 i386 Thanks in advance. -- Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lphp.org PGP/GnuPG key: http://www.lphp.org

Re: rpc.lockd core dumped

On Saturday 08 November 2003 12:26, Harti Brandt wrote: I can only say that I had a core dump under current on sparc, but the core file was unusable. Can you compile rcp.lockd with -g in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS and try to find out with gdb where it aborts? Allright, as soon as I get home in 4/5

Re: NFS client mount options in CURRENT/5.1-

Scott W wrote: mount -tnfs -orw,rsize=8196,wsize=8196,bg,hard,intr,async sol:/export /mnt nfs: -o rsize=: option not supported Try -r 8196 -w 8196 and have a look at man mount_nfs. Antoine ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: rpc.lockd core dumped

I will rpc.lockd with -ggdb as you said and see if it is repeatable. Unfortunately, I'm not home right now, so I'll do this in 3 o 4 days. Regards. Antoine ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: rpc.lockd core dumped

Check to make sure that rpc.statd is running. There was an old bug that rpc.lockd would dump core if it couldn't find a statd. Ho, it is running :) Actually, all my homedir are mounted with NFS, so rpc.lockd get used a lot. That is why it is an important concern to me. I couldn't find any

upgraded to CURRENT = system is dead

... By the way, I compiled CURRENT with dynamic root. Thanks in advance. -- Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lphp.org PGP/GnuPG key: http://www.lphp.org/ressources/ajacoutot.asc ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: upgraded to CURRENT = system is dead

Selon long [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reboot make world single user mode, make installworld reboot and it's up and running... no more sig12 or anything like that... Yes, but no ! I don't have any sig12 error... I have: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libedit.so.4 not found And I can't even

Re: upgraded to CURRENT = system is dead

Selon Dylan Wylie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The idea is that you need to build a new kernel with the new sources before you install world. You built your kernel before building the sources, so your kernel is based on old source. Quoting from another message: make buildworld make buildkernel

Re: upgraded to CURRENT = system is dead

Selon Aron Håkanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you are looking for a fast and temporary solution, just to finish the installworld process, you can export the following value to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable: $LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/lib:/usr/lib Hey :) Thanks a lot... I'll try that. Antoine

Re: upgraded to CURRENT = system is dead

Selon Michael Collette [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just ran into this very same thing today on a brand new installation. Upon reboot I can't even get to a shell. Was rather hoping someone had some more information about this. Running the installation on an IBM xSeries 305 with a P4. Going

Re: upgraded to CURRENT = system is dead

On Tuesday 18 November 2003 00:17, Garance A Drosihn wrote: Users need to specify a single target of 'installkernel', with no blanks between the two words. Antoine, was that just a typo, or did you really do 'make install kernel'? I was a typo :) -- Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: Re: rpc.lockd core dumped

I can only say that I had a core dump under current on sparc, but the core file was unusable. Can you compile rcp.lockd with -g in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS and try to find out with gdb where it aborts? harti Hi :) I investigate a little more this nfs locking issue. I recompile my system with

ntpd and kvm_getprocs

#---# Thanks. -- Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lphp.org PGP/GnuPG key: http://www.lphp.org/ressources/ajacoutot.asc ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

poor NFS performance in CURRENT

Hi :) I upgraded two boxes to FreeBSD-5.2-BETA a week ago and I noticed that NFS performance is very slow compared to 4.x-RELEASE. Before, NFS transfers were between 10 and 12 MB/s and now I don't go past 7 MB/s. My exports/mount settings did not change and the hardware is obviously the same.