Re: VMware X11 and -current

1999-08-03 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:30:25PM -0400, Eric J. Chet wrote: On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: :--0-169768575-933691257=:71237 :Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII : :Hello : I have been using FreeBSD under vmware for a few weeks now, :running 3.2R. Everything

Re: VMware X11 and -current

1999-08-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 01:07:13PM +0200, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: Bernd Walter wrote: It needs ttyp0 as tty0 and so on. I tried it myself under current and got the X11 window. but it complained that it can't find /proc/cpuinfo. I never beleaved that it would work after that. I

Re: VMware X11 and -current

1999-08-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 11:49:33PM +0900, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: At this point we must still be in freebsd xinit, then XF86_VMware(linux server) get started. I'm running a linux X server under freebsd. Under 3.2R all I had to do was change the symlink for X to point to XF86_VMware,

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:43:13PM -0700, Parag Patel wrote: -ddb crash output- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode mp_lock = 0303; cpuid = 3; lapic.id = 0200 fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 04:48:32PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: : :How similar? The trap above is extremely bad; it looks like a return :on a corrupted stack or a jump through a null function vector. : :Make very sure that your vinum kld is in sync with your kernel. This looks like

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 10:59:22PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: This is definitely a pbuf. Did you apply the patches Greg emailed? Not yet. I will do it today. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-30 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 09:14:11AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 03:58:16PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: Yes, this is the same thing. Until Parag came along, I was beginning to think it was a problem with your hardware :-( Yes - I would have done tests with a host

Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-25 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 04:36:54PM -0400, Brad Chisholm wrote: D d0State: up Device /dev/da0eAvail: 0/17366 MB (0%) D d1State: up Device /dev/da1eAvail: 0/17366 MB (0%) D d2State: up Device

Re: /bin/sh Exec format error

1999-10-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 02:05:37PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote: Now system is hosed: it fails in rc.init (thereabout), because it claims /bin/sh: Exec format error. I can't enter single user mode either for same reason. What about using /bin/csh for single user mode? -- B.Walter

ahc panics and (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): data overrun detected in Data-Out phase. Tag == 0x25.

1999-10-06 Thread Bernd Walter
I'm getting this with a recent current (6. october): (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): data overrun detected in Data-Out phase. Tag == 0x25. (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): Have seen Data Phase. Length = 0. NumSGs = 1. (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): data overrun detected in Data-Out phase. Tag == 0x25. (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): Have seen

Re: ahc panics and (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): data overrun detected in Data-Out phase. Tag == 0x25.

1999-10-07 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 03:56:27PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I'm getting this with a recent current (6. october): (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): data overrun detected in Data-Out phase. Tag == 0x25. (da2:ahc2:0:2:0): Have seen Data Phase. Length = 0.

Re: -current crash

1999-10-17 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Oct 17, 1999 at 10:42:51PM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote: [...] #3 0xc02117b1 in trap_pfault () #4 0xc0211313 in trap () #5 0xc101891b in ?? () #6 0xc1018752 in ?? () #7 0xc101854e in ?? () #8 0xc0186a66 in spec_strategy () #9 0xc018601d in spec_vnoperate () [...] What

Re: -current crash

1999-10-17 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 12:16:08AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote: The combination of vinum raid5 and softupdates is known to trigger a bug which may look just as you described. I might help if you disable softupdates on the vinum volumes. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project

Re: Need help with vinum (fwd)

1999-10-23 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 08:52:10PM -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote: drive a device /dev/da3 drive b device /dev/da4 You need to label the drive first and use such as da3e in vinum. The Handbook tells you how to do. vinum - create -f drv 1: drive a device /dev/da3 ** 1 Drive a has invalid

Re: Fsck follies

1999-11-22 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 02:57:39PM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote: On Sunday, 21st November 1999, Christopher Masto wrote: On Sun, Nov 21, 1999 at 10:36:32PM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote: When the system came back up, fsck -p didn't like the vinum volume. No sweat, I ran it manually. There

Re: Problem with syscons in VESA mode

1999-12-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:22:54PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: On 02-Dec-99 Maxim Sobolev wrote: Tony Finch wrote: Maxim Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using non-standard 100x37 console mode on my notebook, because in 80x25 text mode letters seems too big for my 12' panel,

Re: Actual probs with 'ipfw'

2002-10-26 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 10:04:44PM +0200, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: On Saturday 26 October 2002 21:48, you wrote: No, the problem is that you need to installworld to have an updated ipfw(8) binary. Confirmed! Thanks a lot! PS: So the HEADSUP-strategy has its limitations... ;-)

Re: USB problem (Who owns USB code in -current?)

2002-11-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:33:24AM -0800, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: Dear Hackers, Who owns USB code in -current? I need an USB expert advice on the FreeBSD specific USB problem. Basically whenever i put my laptop into docking station and try to plug Bluetooth USB dongle i get uhub1: device

Re: USB problem (Who owns USB code in -current?)

2002-11-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 09:33:16PM +, Josef Karthauser wrote: On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 01:00:43PM -0800, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: Bernd, Who owns USB code in -current? I need an USB expert advice on the FreeBSD specific USB problem. Basically whenever i put my laptop into docking

Re: XFree

2002-11-08 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:02:14PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: Horen wrote: You stated Typing blind starts X again. Can you tell us what you mean by this? o It restarts X, as if you typed startx Exactly that. The problem is clearly in the X11 code, then, since it is not

Re: usb modem problem

2002-11-30 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 11:44:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am trying to use an usb modem under freebsd. It is detected during boot. My system is current as of yesterday sources. Dmesg output is attached. Modem is recognized as /dev/ugen0 and there is another node

Re: USB mass device not quite there

2002-12-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 08:54:25PM -0800, Pete Carah wrote: Pardon sending this to both stable and current, but this is relevant to both and the code paths may be different... I just acquired a usb mass device which partly identifies. This is a Dazzle multi-card reader. The CF slot works

Re: WhiteHeat 4 port USB serial adaptor

2002-12-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 12:04:26PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: Connecttech makes a 4 port serial adaptor that plugs into the USB port http://www.connecttech.com/sub/Products/USBProducts_WhiteHeat.asp Does anyone know if the ucom driver in current supports this ? I dont have a current box

Re: USB support for new HP printers?

2002-12-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 11:36:15PM -0600, John Nielsen wrote: Are there plans to add USB support for HP's newer printers to FreeBSD? Specificially, the OfficeJets and the LaserJet 1200? They use a new/different/broken USB interface so they're just recognized as ugen devices at the

Re: SCM Microsystems Inc. eUSB SmartMedia Adapter

2002-12-11 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:58:12AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:13:49PM -0500, Brad Hughes wrote: Try to remove device ugen from your kernel; it is a bit agressive when 'claiming' USB devices. I had the same problem with an USB gamepad and uhid devices. This shouldn't

Re: SCM Microsystems Inc. eUSB SmartMedia Adapter

2002-12-11 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 07:03:36PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:12:21PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:58:12AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:13:49PM -0500, Brad Hughes wrote: Try to remove device ugen from your kernel

Re: OHCI patch - please test [was Re: USB issues with Apollo KT133A mobo]

2002-12-13 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 07:27:07PM -0500, Brian F. Feldman wrote: Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, If you're an ohci user can you please test this patch out for inclusion in 5.0. I need to know that it doesn't break anything - the reports are that it fixes broken ohci

Re: UMASS USB bug? (getting the Sony disk-on-key device working).

2002-12-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:32:23AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: It took a hellofalong time pulling my hair out trying to figure out why the Sony disk-on-key I just bought didn't work. First I added a Quirk entry for the standard 6-byte problem, but it didn't solve the

Re: UMASS USB bug? (getting the Sony disk-on-key device working).

2002-12-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:08:27PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote: Hey, Matt While you're at it, could you have a look at PR kern/46176 ? =) At least would you tell me if you have the same problem with your device(s) The umass cam interaction is questionable. I've seen lots of problems caused

Re: UMASS USB bug? (getting the Sony disk-on-key device working).

2002-12-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:06:19AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: : :On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:08:27PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote: : Hey, Matt : : While you're at it, could you have a look at PR kern/46176 ? =) : : At least would you tell me if you have the same problem with your :

Re: UMASS USB bug? (getting the Sony disk-on-key device working)

2002-12-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:24:09PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: On 19-Dec-2002 Matthew Dillon wrote: It took a hellofalong time pulling my hair out trying to figure out why the Sony disk-on-key I just bought didn't work. First I added a Quirk entry for the standard 6-byte

Re: UMASS USB bug? (getting the Sony disk-on-key device working)

2002-12-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:49:16PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: On 19-Dec-2002 Bernd Walter wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:24:09PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: On 19-Dec-2002 Matthew Dillon wrote: It took a hellofalong time pulling my hair out trying to figure out why the Sony

Re: UMASS USB bug? (getting the Sony disk-on-key device working).

2002-12-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:24:28PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Bernd Walter wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:06:19AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: The panic described in 46176 has happened to me on -current. On -stable I have managed (very easily) to get

Re: UMASS USB bug? (getting the Sony disk-on-key device working)

2002-12-20 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 05:11:32PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: I found another couple of bugs, this time in OHCI's DMA buffer chaining code. Great. A patch for this with additional debugging code is included below (for current). There are two bugs. I do not know if

Re: XFree86-4 can't start

2000-03-11 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 12:24:10PM -0800, Nawfal M. Rouyan wrote: Hi, I've installed XFree86 version 4 trough the ports collection but it won't start and I think it is because of the missing mouse module. Since I'm using lynx, I can't attached the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file for your

Re: XFree86-4 can't start

2000-03-11 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 02:30:46AM +, Cliff Rowley wrote: Two things, I know it's silly, but I might as well ask: 1) Did you install XFree86 4 over an old XFree86? If so, did you ask it specifically to make and install aout libraries (re: __Xglobal_lock) - the aout libraries arent

Re: current panics

2000-03-24 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 12:29:28PM +0100, Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen wrote: Hi, I know it isn't much (no debugger compiled in (yet)), but is anybody else seeing panics like this: mode = 0100644, inum = 214354, fs = /data0 panic: ffs_valloc: dup alloc syncing disks... 23 13 4 3 3

Re: vinum possible casulty of B_* patches?

2000-03-26 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 01:15:07AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: I'm about to wander down vinum's source again. With a kernel and vinum module dated approx Tue Feb 29 06:53:56 PST 2000 everything works fine. I recently (tonight) I cvsup'd to 5.0 to play with Matt's SMP stuff and came

Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5

2000-04-01 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:25:44PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: Hi I have four (4) ATA disks, all same new 20GB IBM 7200rpm models. Intel Seattle BX2 mobo, PIIX4 controller. I'm not expecting any performance increase or such, simply want to get my hands on. Ata driver, as the -current

Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5

2000-04-01 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 09:11:40AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: On Friday, 31 March 2000 at 21:32:22 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote: Yup, Greg and I know of this problem, it also happens with the wd driver and with CAM, so the problem is probably not the driver. I'm investigating this right now,

Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5

2000-04-01 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 01:15:39AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: Greg - I'm using vinums raid5 code since months now for FreeBSDs CVS-Tree on 7x 200M disks - it does not hang for me since a long time. The latest current I tested R5 well is from 19th March on alpha. That's shortly before PHKs

Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5

2000-04-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 03:39:35PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: I got now crash under 4.0-RELEASE, with syncer and bufdaemon in the same vrlock state, pax in flswait. I was in single-user mode using pax to extract usr archive to newly created raid5 volume. I'm using NFS mount with flags -3i

Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5

2000-04-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 01:50:16AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 01:15:39AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: Greg - I'm using vinums raid5 code since months now for FreeBSDs CVS-Tree on 7x 200M disks - it does not hang for me since a long time. The latest current I tested

Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5

2000-04-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 05:37:30PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: Are you for any chance running the NFS Server without nfsd? I expect them to be needed if you are serving vinum volumes. Sometimes I'm to stupid - the NFS case was a different thread. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project

Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5

2000-04-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 05:38:01PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Vallo Kallaste wrote: On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 03:39:35PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hook up serial console to get full traceback next time, but I don't have any knowledge for further

Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5

2000-04-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 08:02:54PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: Yes, but I don't have space for crashdump and I can't build new kernel with limited memory usage because I don't have /usr filesystem up and running. Is there a way to limit memory usage without recompiling kernel? I can store

Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5

2000-04-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 09:39:36PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: I dont think vinum is/was usable under -current at least not the RAID5 stuff, its broken, and some of it is because greg is not up to date with what -current looks like these days. Can you please explain what have massivly

Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5

2000-04-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 07:41:54AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: On Sunday, 2 April 2000 at 22:22:39 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote: It seems Bernd Walter wrote: On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 09:39:36PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: I dont think vinum is/was usable under -current at least not the RAID5

Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5

2000-04-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 07:43:00AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: I found a potentially serious bug in the RAID calculations yesterday: it assumed that sizeof (int) == 4. I suspect that it would just slow down the calculations, but in any case I've fixed it. That's generaly not good but allways

Re: panic: ffs_valloc: dup alloc

2000-05-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 04:13:43PM +0200, Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen wrote: Hi, On a -current box, sources approx. 2½ days old, I'm having problems using a vinum raid5 volume - usually the box freezes totally when trying to use the filesystem (mkdir xxx; cd xxx - crash), but last time it

Re: panic: ffs_valloc: dup alloc

2000-05-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen wrote: On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 11:21:51PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: Does vinum list saying that one subdisk of your R5 volume is down? 5 subdisks: S raid5.p0.s0 State: up PO:0 B Size: 4133 MB

Re: Looking for testers for if_dc patches

2000-05-30 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 12:28:25AM -0700, Bill Paul wrote: Several people have reported problems with if_dc botching autonegotiation on 21143 NICs with non-MII media, such as the DEC/Compaq DE500-BA and the built-in 10/100 ethernet on some alphas. As my first official act as a BSDi/WC

Re: Looking for testers for if_dc patches

2000-05-31 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:30:51PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 09:29:46AM -0700, Bill Paul wrote: May 31 10:56:38 p6 /kernel: dc0: Intel 21143 10/100BaseTX port 0xec00-0xec7f m em 0xfdfffc00-0xfdfffc7f irq 9 at device 3.0 on pci0 May 31 10:56:38 p6 /kernel: dc0:

Re: Remote GDB *still* buggy...

2000-06-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 12:27:27PM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: On Wednesday, 14 June 2000 at 11:05:41 -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: I still can't get remote GDB to work correctly in a 5.0-current environment at speeds greater than 9600bps. Is anyone else experiencing similar results? I

Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP development

2000-06-22 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:34:47PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: Ok, I have put up a web page that will track my efforts. http://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSDSmp/ Your first patchset contains only i386 code. What is the timeframe for alpha relative to i386? Will each i386 code step

Re: USB Printer?

2003-08-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 01:02:51PM +0200, Daniel Nielsen wrote: Hi. I installed 5.1-RELEASE on a compuiter with a nforce2 mobo, worked nice... Then I bought a Brother-5050 Laser printer (Postscript). Installed and configured cups. cups worked fine. Then I realized, the printer only works if

Re: USB Printer?

2003-08-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:53:29PM +0200, Daniel Nielsen wrote: On 18/08-03 14.59, Bernd Walter wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 01:02:51PM +0200, Daniel Nielsen wrote: Hi. I installed 5.1-RELEASE on a compuiter with a nforce2 mobo, worked nice... Then I bought a Brother-5050 Laser

Re: IBM T30 bluetooth - success (fwd)

2003-08-25 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:24:20PM -0700, Lee Damon wrote: Does anyone have an estimate of when this patch will be checked in? I will commit this patch during this week. Several persons were asked for review without even a reply. Thanks for reminding me. -- B.Walter BWCT

Re: panic with CF drive + USB reader

2003-08-25 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:11:45PM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: Here's another, different one: (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:0):

Re: panic with CF drive + USB reader

2003-08-26 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 04:22:57PM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: It seems that this happens under light or no load only. I had been doing a heavy cycle of dump/restore/dd, etc, and all was well. Could it be that the MicroDrive does some kind of internal power management that delays its reponses

Re: IBM T30 bluetooth - success (fwd)

2003-08-26 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 08:46:12AM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote: eh? i silently assumed that it already was commited! i used bluetooth on my T30 on -current which is maybe three weeks old and it works! and to make this very clear, it did NOT work on a -current from around the time when i sent

Re: fxp0: device timeout in -current from 31.8.

2003-08-31 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 01:55:49PM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: I tried to install FreeBSD 5.1-current from 30.07. and 31.08 on my wifes machine. Unluckily I experience problems with the fxp driver. On google I found a similar report from June 3rd.

Re: panic: Negative bio_offset (-15050100712783872) on bio 0xc7725d50

2003-09-17 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: This is either disk corruption or an ffs bug. ffs passes the garbage block number 0xe5441ae9720 to bread. GEOM then handles this austerely by panicing. Garbage block

Re: panic: Negative bio_offset (-15050100712783872) on bio 0xc7725d50

2003-09-17 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:30:15AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernd Walter writes: On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: This is either disk corruption or an ffs bug. ffs

Re: panic: Negative bio_offset (-15050100712783872) on bio 0xc7725d50

2003-09-17 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:52:03PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Bernd Walter wrote this message on Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:27 +0200: On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: This is either disk corruption

Re: X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver

2003-09-21 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:35:33AM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: Hi, I'm trying to get the USB RF remote control that comes with some ATI Wonder cards to do something meaningful under -current. It shows up as an X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver with three devices: /dev/ugen0, and

Re: X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver

2003-09-21 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:32:28PM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: Bernd, Bernd Walter wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:35:33AM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: static char init1[]= { 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x20, 0x14 }; static char init2[]= { 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x20, 0x14, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20 }; Are you

Re: Where is my SLIP interface

2003-09-25 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 07:49:18PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 02:43:21PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: Perhaps 'The Complete FreeBSD' by Greg Lehey will help out. Not any more. I removed that chapter from the book. The chapter's available (also covers UUCP) if

Re: Where is my SLIP interface

2003-09-26 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 12:47:53PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: From: Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 07:49:18PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: But am I to understand that running slattach creates the sl0 device?? by something like 'ifconfig sl0 create

Re: Where is my SLIP interface

2003-09-26 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 01:29:30PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: Don't ask why, but running 'slattach -l /dev/cuaa0' works No modem is connect now so it could be the -l stuff. And slattach would be waiting for my modem to signal things. Possible - I never used anything else, because I

Re: HEADSUP: Change of makedev() semantics.

2003-09-28 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 11:22:07PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: I am in the process of adding ref-counting and locking to dev_t, and would very much prefer if we could get this step completed soon before 5-STABLE gets branched. All this will be transparent to the majority of device

Re: X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver

2003-09-30 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 07:24:48PM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: Bernd, Bernd Walter wrote: What does USB_DEBUG with hw.usb.debug=2 and hw.usb.ugen.debug=2 say? it says this: usbd_setup_pipe: dev=0xc3f9d980 iface=0xc3efbaa0 ep=0xc3f192c8 pipe=0xdb936974 ugenwrite: transfer 5 bytes

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700 Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available on UFS1. The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pre-dates

Re: SMBus / I2C h/w sensors and FreeBSD 5.1

2003-10-04 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:28:16PM +0300, Dan Naumov wrote: Hello (World). controller intpm0 You need to have intpm hardware to get this driver working. There are other drivers available depending on your chipset. What is the pciconf -lv output? Investingating further, I see that I have no

Re: SMBus / I2C h/w sensors and FreeBSD 5.1

2003-10-04 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 01:55:43AM +0300, Dan Naumov wrote: On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 00:44, Bernd Walter wrote: You need to have intpm hardware to get this driver working. There are other drivers available depending on your chipset. What is the pciconf -lv output? There you go

Re: usb digital camera failure

2003-10-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 10:39:14PM -0700, Doug White wrote: On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Matt wrote: I have a fuji digital camera which has always previously worked with -current no problems. However I have not tried to copy images from it for a couple of months now. [...] Oct 5 23:02:58

Re: usb digital camera failure

2003-10-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:26:34PM +0100, Matt wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# dd if=/dev/da0s1 of=/root/blah bs=512 dd: /dev/da0s1: Input/output error 63646+0 records in 63646+0 records out 32586752 bytes transferred in 812.878115 secs (40088 bytes/sec) [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# mdconfig -a

Re: Atmel AT76C503 USB 802.11b device driver

2003-10-08 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:59:40AM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote: Aww crap, my apologies for the duplicate email.. sendmail appears to be on steroids or something. The messages are sumited twice by your mailclient - it's not the MTAs fault. See that there are several minutes between them and that

no kernel output after update

2003-10-12 Thread Bernd Walter
OS was -current from 8th Feb and I updated to recent one today. Now I have a new world, but forced to keep with the Feb kernel, because the new kernel gives absolutely no output. Console should be on vga. I already tried switching to a vga card and to disable int routing, because I often saw

Re: Interrupt statistics?

2003-10-12 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 09:55:03AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Does anyone have recent statistics for interrupt latency and arrival : timings? In -stable I know that we service fast interrupts in 10us on a

Re: no kernel output after update

2003-10-12 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:23:46PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: OS was -current from 8th Feb and I updated to recent one today. Now I have a new world, but forced to keep with the Feb kernel, because the new kernel gives absolutely no output. Console should be on vga. I already tried

dummynet: warning, refcnt now -1, decreasing

2003-10-16 Thread Bernd Walter
I get several of these messages with a recent -current: Oct 16 17:38:35 cicely6 kernel: dummynet: warning, refcnt now 0, decreasing Oct 16 17:38:36 cicely6 last message repeated 2 times Oct 16 17:38:36 cicely6 kernel: dummynet: warning, refcnt now -1, decreasing Oct 16 17:38:36 cicely6 kernel:

Re: Working umass SD card readers.

2003-10-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 03:16:33PM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 05:29:08PM -0700, Michael wrote: Just to let everyone know, I've been using a Lexar Media JumpDrive Trio (picked up at Target for $19.95) and it works. Oct 11 11:58:41 whatever kernel: umass0: Lexar

Re: new -current panic

2003-10-20 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:09:47AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: Just got this one (using bsd scheduler): Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x24 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc04b8f3b stack

Re: USB problem: /dev/ugen* dynamically auto-reconfigures to root:operator 644, so non-root user unable to access USB devices even if wanted

2003-10-20 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:44:50PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andreas Klemm writ es: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ ls -l /dev/ugen* crw-r--r-- 1 root operator 114, 0 Oct 20 13:14 /dev/ugen0 crw-r--r-- 1 root operator 114, 2 Oct 20 13:14 /dev/ugen0.2

Re: Problems with NFS (client) under 5.1.

2003-10-21 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:09:18PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: I'm trying to set a FreeBSD 5.1 machine up as an NFS client. The server is on an SGI box. Things are strange: phoenix# uname -a FreeBSD phoenix.mydomain 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Thu Sep 18 15:20:19 GMT

Re: SCSI cd errors

2003-10-22 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 07:47:14PM +0200, Sven Esbjerg wrote: I upgraded my PC yesterday and have experienced hangs in boot. It seems like something has changed in the SCSI or GEOM code. I have an Advansys SCSI controller with two plextor CD drivers attached as well as a HP scanner. When the

Re: Forward: HEADS UP! Default value of ip6_v6only changed

2003-10-29 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:51:59PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our default of net.inet6.ip6.v6only was off in 4.X, and was changed to on on 5.X to follow NetBSD's practice. This behavior on 5.X breaks RFC2553/3493, and the change was

Re: IBM T30 USB issue: kernel: uhub2: device problem, disablingport 1

2003-04-05 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 10:02:47AM -0800, Lee Damon wrote: I've just sup'd a completely clean source tree and compiled a new kernel and world. My kernconf is the generic one with pcm and apm turned on. apci is turned off in the hints file (because it breaks the mouse). I have INVARIANTS,

Re: USB printing mangles printjob :-(

2003-06-05 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 12:16:56PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: While testing my dads HP 880C printer, I found out that our USB printing mangles printjobs. stable or current? I ran the colorcir.ps file through ghostscript with the hpijs driver set to output for the 880C and saved the

Re: USB printing mangles printjob :-(

2003-06-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:11:23PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:49:25 +0200 Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I send that file to the printer via the parallel port, it prints perfectly. If I send it via USB/ulpt there are corrupted bytes in the job

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:13:31PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts. Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific and 2) if the interrupt route returns an invalid IRQ (i.e. 255), then we don't change the

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:36:54PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts. : Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific : and

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:04:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On 06-Jun-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also, we haven't recorded our info in the underlying pci register. Don't know if that will matter for

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-06 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:17:43PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I already wondered how you could route interrupts without ACPI until I : booted my printserver with a recent kernel. PCIBIOS! Well - I'm

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

2003-06-07 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:08:12PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: dmesg of machine which now runs with the fix: npx0: math processor on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 pcib0: Host to PCI bridge at pcibus 0 on motherboard Same situtation with my Board - no $PIR

Re: How to kill a 5.0R installation with 5.1R

2003-06-07 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 03:45:56PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: Folks, This is the second time that I have this happen here. I had a 5.0R installed on a box. After upgrading, (make world make kernel) the box crashes instantly in the boot loader and reboots itself. Have you tried

Re: FreeBSD V5.0 and USB to Serial on Toshiba Satellite 1110

2003-05-27 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 08:38:51PM +0200, Richard Kaestner wrote: My Notebook (Toshiba Satellite 1110) does not have serial ports, so I wanted to connect a serial adapter. The adapter is recognized (see below), but I can't access any of the serial ports: [EMAIL PROTECTED] minicom

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-01 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:24:59PM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:00:16AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: ++ | Issue | Status| Responsible | Description |

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-01 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 05:39:58PM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:18:10PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: On Sat, 31 May 2003, Scott Long wrote: It's been a matter of not having enough time, nothing more. I *will* address this one way or another before the release.

  1   2   3   4   >