.
My best guess is that the chipset responds slowly to probes, thus it takes a while
to get the list of devices from it. However, I've never looked into it any more
than that.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 02:55:46PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Bill Moran, and lo! it spake thus:
My best guess is that the chipset responds slowly to probes, thus it
takes a while to get the list of devices from it. However, I've never
looked into it any more than
, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Bill Moran wrote:
Mike Atamas wrote:
When my system boots it seems to stall when it gets here:
xa807,0xa400-0xa403,0xa000-0xa007 mem 0xe100-0xe10001ff irq 11 at device 11.
0 on pci1
ata2: at 0xe100 on atapci0
ata3
Just curious if anyone knows the origin of all these auto-responses, etc.
I'm seeing a lot of these on every list I'm subscribed to (not all of them
FreeBSD related) so I was wondering if some Windows trojan is running rampant
and using these list addresses as return addys?
Anyone know?
--
Bill
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 18:03, Bill Moran wrote:
Just curious if anyone knows the origin of all these auto-responses, etc.
I'm seeing a lot of these on every list I'm subscribed to (not all of them
FreeBSD related) so I was wondering if some Windows trojan
to be the same as your
problem.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. I really hope it isn't memory I sold
my thumbs to get 512megs of Corsair XSM :-(
Download memtest86 and let it run for a couple of hours. If you see any
errors at all, try and get that memory replaced under warranty.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
for discussing
relatively unimportant details into the ground.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
to pursue their goal
of having PAE in 4.9.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on resulted in something
like 40x performance improvement.
To me, this means:
a) if you want reliable, don't use IDE with WC
b) if you want reliable and fast, don't use IDE, period, use SCSI.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
a great deal of information after a crash. This section of the
developer's handbook will talk you through it:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
the
question you expected.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-RELEASE.
Antoine
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:/home2 /home nfs rw,bg 0 0
Since it mounts manually but not automatically on reboot, I'm still stuck.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
in the server ... blissfully figuring that something will
magically work.
Would someone point me at the right documentation for booting from
vinum ... or at least at some hints?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/vinum-root.html
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http
syntax is correct. If it doesn't work, focus on
/etc/fstab as the problem.
HTH.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
, I believe you need to install x-wrapper to get
around permission issues.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
dangerous without understanding why it was
dangerous. I used it anyway, because it improved performance
considerably.
Also, this is off-topic for -CURRENT, please remove -CURRENT from the
CCs if you respond. I'm redirecting to -QUESTIONS for future discussion.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
. However, the System Monitor's display of
this is simply inaccurate. There was NOT 100M free when it started swapping
on my system.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:53:21 -0400, Bill Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahmed Al-Hindawi wrote:
Hi,
I have 160Mb of SDRAM (PC100) on a 233Mhz CyrixInstead machine and I
seem to have memory mangament problems. The BIOS indicates I have 160,
so does the BSD bootstrap
Getting America's Army to work, even Windows explorer or
IE. The only thing I ever got to run under wine was puTTY ... which is one
Windows app I have absolutely zero use for.
Eventually, I gave up on wine and cleaned all traces of it from my HDD. YMMV,
but I thought I'd throw my $.02 in.
--
Bill
Hey,
This isn't quite -CURRENT, but it's 5.1-RELEASE.
I'm trying to put together a typical nat/gateway box. But I can't
seem to get both network cards to work at the same time. I've tried
a 3com card, a realtek card, as well as the onboard sis chipset card.
One card always works, the other
Nevermind.
I think I've been working too many hours. The problem was a stupid
nat misconfiguration that I have now fixed. The strange behaviour this
was causing misled me to believe one of the NICs wasn't working correctly.
Bill Moran wrote:
Hey,
This isn't quite -CURRENT, but it's 5.1-RELEASE
I posted this to -STABLE on Monday, since then I've come to understand
that -STABLE doesn't really include 5.0 (even though it's been released).
That, combined with the fact that I received no answer, has propted me
to post this to -CURRENT. Following is my original post:
original post
We're
Nate Lawson wrote:
See thread just above your post, titled Re: Time keeping problems with
5.0-RELEASE
Thanks for the reply, Nate.
I've searched the -CURRENT mailing list archives for a number of combinations
of the title you describe and haven't found anything. Any suggestions?
--
Bill Moran
I'm looking at creating a machine for backing up/archiving other
FreeBSD servers. One of the requirements will be burning DVDs
(as some archives are 2-3g directories - difficult to break up)
So the question I'm asking is:
Is anyone actually using DVD burning under FreeBSD 5? If so,
what
I'm considering setting up a FreeBSD 5 machine as a dedicated
backup/archive computer on a network I administer.
I'm curious to hear some opinions on how wise this is. I know
that 5 is still in a -CURRENT status and I've seen (and repeated)
the warnings that it's not really production quality
From: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm considering setting up a FreeBSD 5 machine as a dedicated
backup/archive computer on a network I administer.
I'm curious to hear some opinions on how wise this is. I know
that 5 is still in a -CURRENT
From: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm considering setting up a FreeBSD 5 machine as a dedicated
backup/archive computer on a network I administer.
I'm curious
hit by moving performance-critical parts
of the application into kernel space (such as IIS and MSSQL)?
At least, that's what Eric Raymond claims in his latest book. I don't
think that's an approach I would like to see FreeBSD take.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
Michael Edenfield wrote:
* Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031127 17:50]:
On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:31 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
walt wrote:
To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
performance
device large enough to
hold the entire contents of memory + a little?
The docs are here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran
33 matches
Mail list logo