Re: Panic caused by mbuf exhaustion in i4b with AVM PCI

1999-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
hasn't even been exhausted, then you still potentially have space to allocate from (this is the way it presently works) and the panic is unlikely to be related to an mbuf pointer being NULL and mis-treated. -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
-- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
allocator, but I have no idea why.. maybe someone else can enlighten me.. As I mentionned in a previous Email, it all has to do with what were considered to be the requirements of network buffer allocations and optimisations in that respect. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:27:39PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Bosko Milekic writes: On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 04:23:33PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: If we're going to nitpick the mbuf system, a much, much worse problem is that you cannot allocate an mbuf chain w/o holding Giant

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
semantics too, especially given the fact that the old mbuf 'm' is then freed (doesn't this destroy the label?!). If that's indeed the case, then this copy remains bogus. Sam -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-25 Thread Bosko Milekic
was no longer embarrassing. Drew -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-26 Thread Bosko Milekic
, only do it if you do the exact same thing mb_alloc does for regular clusters because otherwise you'll have to worry about destructing the counter before freeing the mbuf). Drew -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-27 Thread Bosko Milekic
2K mbuf clusters) those can be allocated in one shot with an mbuf pre-attached to it by the existing allocator anyway and an interface is provided to do so (m_getcl(), iirc). -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2002-11-27 Thread Bosko Milekic
with external storage and may even allocate more than one and chain them together for you in one shot and without dropping the per-CPU cache lock, if it can get away with it. It does a 'best' fit allocation so you effectively have your 'small,' 'big,' and 'real big' scenario. -- Bosko

Re: mballoc kernel thread

2002-12-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
this is difficult so I don't know how we would resolve the conflict. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: mballoc kernel thread

2002-12-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 09:35:28AM +0900, Kyunghwan Kim wrote: On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 06:47:35PM -0500, Bosko Milekic wrote: I don't really know what to tell you because I'm working on the exact same thing (and I mentionned in the Emails you brought up that I would be) except just

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2003-01-02 Thread Bosko Milekic
fast, but I don't know how I could make it happen for other external buffer types other than the way I just described. Thanks, Drew -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

Re: mbuf header bloat ?

2003-01-02 Thread Bosko Milekic
an EXT-type flag to mark the data buffer types using this method. Thanks. P.S.: Try not to use MEXTADD, if possible. Use m_extadd() instead, which is the procedure-equivalent version. MEXTADD is just provided for 'backwards-compatibility'. It used to be a large ugly macro. -- Bosko

Re: HOWTO: Basic-block profiling on -current.

2003-01-06 Thread Bosko Milekic
3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: INVARIANTS doesn't work?

2000-03-23 Thread Bosko Milekic
ou've done this and the following will come out as a pretty useless question for you, but I have not seen it mentionned in your Email: Do you have `options INVARIANT_SUPPORT' ? ...... Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: linux-flashplugin...no sound?

2000-05-15 Thread Bosko Milekic
at least one more person having the exact same problem at the same time, I don't believe it to be an isolated case. --Bosko -- Bosko Milekic * pages.infinit.net/bmilekic/index.html * www.technokratis.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Give a man a fish a

FOLLOWING config changes? : Kernel profiling support

2000-06-18 Thread Bosko Milekic
in statically. The kernel built fine, but when it came time to boot it, again, no response from keyboard, nothing at the console. This time though, the kernel wasn't even booting. Has anybody noticed/tried this recently? Am I forgetting something? Cheers, Bosko. -- Bosko Milekic

Re: FOLLOWING config changes? : Kernel profiling support

2000-06-18 Thread Bosko Milekic
, that boot'd fine, is: @(#)FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jun 14 01:03:00 ADT 2000 With every other one since resulting in the above ... -- Bosko Milekic * Voice/Mobile: 514.865.7738 * Pager: 514.921.0237 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.technokratis.com/ To Unsubscribe: send

Re: Huh? ssh stopped working with new kernel.

2000-06-27 Thread Bosko Milekic
nt" in the body of the message -- Bosko Milekic * Voice/Mobile: 514.865.7738 * Pager: 514.921.0237 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.technokratis.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Questions about kmem_malloc and SPL levels

2000-06-27 Thread Bosko Milekic
problem. The question is exactly: How much of kmem_malloc needs to be under splvm() ? In any case, the comment needs to be changed ASAP (I Emailed the lists myself about this maybe on 2 different occasions before and have gotten no reply). --Bosko -- Bosko Milekic * Voice/Mobile

Re: freeing free cluster?

2000-07-10 Thread Bosko Milekic
. utwente . nl Managers know it must be good because the programmers hate it so much. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message -- Bosko Milekic * Voice/Mobile: 514.865.7738 * Pager: 514.921.0237 [EMAIL

Re: another buildworld -j4 panic

2003-08-14 Thread Bosko Milekic
where we know they belong... that one we talked about adding the other day, did it catch anything? -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

Re: 5.1, Data Corruption, Intel, Oh my! [patch]

2003-08-20 Thread Bosko Milekic
with APM, and then waiting for the results. This is a time-consuming process, but as soon as the problem is addressed, I will commit the changes. Thanks to everyone who has helped test this so far. Regards, -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS

Re: 5.1, Data Corruption, Intel, Oh my! [patch]

2003-08-20 Thread Bosko Milekic
users (for whom acpi works for the most part) could give the patch a try as well (I have a decent-sized list of testers but would nonetheless welcome/appreciate more). Thanks, -Nate Cheers, -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services

Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) UMA pcpu @vm/uma_core.c:1381

2003-08-26 Thread Bosko Milekic
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: mb alloc and: panic: mutex Giant not owned at../../../vm/vm_kern.c:315

2003-05-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
is the best approach. Regards, -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: HEADS UP! Major commits in the tree coming soon

2003-05-30 Thread Bosko Milekic
. Thanks Ken ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Screen saver: bsd_saver.

2003-06-27 Thread Bosko Milekic
must admit that I don't know how to properly prepare a port. The screen saver works and is pretty neat although I had to build in low video mode. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com

Re: Buildworld fails in 5.1

2003-07-16 Thread Bosko Milekic
://www.servint.net/ | McLean, Virginia USA| phone: (703) 847-1381 | ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Bosko

Re: MSDOSFS patch of dirty flag (Darwin Import)

2003-07-18 Thread Bosko Milekic
to this thread. Thanks -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send

Re: SMP problem with uma_zalloc

2003-07-19 Thread Bosko Milekic
. harti -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send

Re: SMP problem with uma_zalloc

2003-07-21 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:03:00AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Bosko Milekic wrote: BM BMOn Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 08:31:26PM +0200, Lara Harti Brandt wrote: BM[...] BM Well the problem is, that nothing is starved. I have an idle machine and BM a zone that I have

Re: SMP problem with uma_zalloc

2003-07-21 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:47:54PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Bosko Milekic wrote: [...] BM It sounds to me like your example is really not the general-case one. BM Basically, you're using a zone capped off at 1 page. Currently in BM UMA, this is the size of the slab

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic

2003-07-21 Thread Bosko Milekic
as long as NMBCLUSTERS is not too-too high). -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic

2003-07-21 Thread Bosko Milekic
to what you're seeing. If reverting to pre-July 20 gets rid of your problem, perhaps we can figure out what commit triggered this behavior for you. Also, do you have PAE enabled? -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic

2003-07-23 Thread Bosko Milekic
in the developers handbook, I seem to remember seeing something about it in there. Thanks, Stephane. ... -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic

2003-07-23 Thread Bosko Milekic
. Be careful, if you only have remote access to the machine, this is generally not a good idea. Thanks, Stephane. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic

2003-07-23 Thread Bosko Milekic
a look at the handbook. thanks again, Stephane. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Loading 5.x onto a laptop

2003-07-26 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 09:18:01PM +, Dave Johnson wrote: Hi Has anyone manage to load ver 5.x into the Compaq Presario 1370 notebook. I get kernel panic all the time Regards Yes. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic

2003-07-27 Thread Bosko Milekic
stable so I can't really fix this. I urge the USB authors to glance there. If you are using USB, try turning it off to see if the panic persists. If not, then we'll have to look elsewhere. Regards, -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services

Re: device driver memory leak in 5.1-20030726?

2003-07-27 Thread Bosko Milekic
University Computer Center Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 University of Vienna http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/ -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com

Re: HEADSUP: UMA not reentrant / possible memory leak

2003-07-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
Jeff will have a chance to take a look at it otherwise I`ll be glancing at it tomorrow. Also, it would be nice if those suffering from recent problems with kmem_map exhaustion on 5.1 try this and note whether or not it gets rid of your panics. Regards, -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL

Re: HEADSUP: UMA not reentrant / possible memory leak

2003-07-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
problems somewhere. There may also be some bucket leakage (although I have not yet confirmed this) as well. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL

Re: HEADSUP: UMA not reentrant / possible memory leak

2003-07-30 Thread Bosko Milekic
, can the calculation of uz_cachefree from the timer routine be axed in the same change, as it is no longer significant? -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic

2003-07-30 Thread Bosko Milekic
of it. You should be able to safely ignore that. Let me know how it works out. Regards, -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic

2003-07-30 Thread Bosko Milekic
, Stephane. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send

Re: vm/map LOR

2003-08-01 Thread Bosko Milekic
Information Sciences Institute -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: vm/map LOR

2003-08-01 Thread Bosko Milekic
Try the attached patch. On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:02:49AM +, Bosko Milekic wrote: fakepg_zone should probably be UMA_ZONE_VM. Or the vm_object lock needs to be dropped before allocating or freeing to that zone. What does Alan think? (cc'd) -Bosko On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04

Re: Memory modified after free / most recently used by GEOM

2003-08-06 Thread Bosko Milekic
/trap.c:1008 #18 0xc02b3e3d in Xint0x80_syscall () at {standard input}:144 ---Can't read userspace from dump, or kernel process--- -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com

Re: new panic during buildworld -j4

2003-08-08 Thread Bosko Milekic
, ebp = 0 --- How about the panic message? There are 4 different panics that could have occured from uma_dbg_free(). Arguments would also be nice, I guess. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com

Re: 5.1, Data Corruption, Intel, Oh my! [patch]

2003-08-11 Thread Bosko Milekic
, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic

2003-08-12 Thread Bosko Milekic
PROTECTED] To: Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:02 AM Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic Hi Bosko, Thank you for your suggestion. I am a little un-easy about upgrading my system from -RELEASE to -CURRENT. Did you mean, simply

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic

2003-08-14 Thread Bosko Milekic
really need to make sure you're supping to HEAD: *default release=cvs tag=. Regards, -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http

Re: 5.1, Data Corruption, Intel, Oh my! [patch] - Fatal trap 12

2003-08-14 Thread Bosko Milekic
kernel configuration file as well as a trace (as above). -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: Perfect Setup to Freebsd Access Point!!!!

2003-08-14 Thread Bosko Milekic
??? Make sure that you have absolutely no debugging options turned on. This includes WITNESS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT, and INVARIANTS at the least (check your kernel configuration file). -- Marcos Biscaysaqu Systems Administrator ThePacific.Net Ltd. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Porting 4.x code to 5.x: zfreei, zinit, struct vm_zone

2003-08-14 Thread Bosko Milekic
for what concerns exported API. You shouldn't have to touch 'vm_zone' directly (it doesn't exist anymore). Thanks. -- Craig Rodrigues http://crodrigues.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http

5.1, Data Corruption, Intel, Oh my! [patch]

2003-08-14 Thread Bosko Milekic
that they really do go away with DISABLE_PSE and DISABLE_PG_G before you contact me; it could just be bad RAM. If I commit this, I want it to have the longest Tested By list ever written in a commit message to date. Please help. :-) Regards, -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Bosko Milekic
AilleCat@EFNet Key fingerprint = 781D 2B47 AA4B FC88 B919 0CD6 26B2 1D62 6FC1 FF16 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-01-31 Thread Bosko Milekic
executes an 'hlt' until the next timer tick. I guess we'll wait for the two other data sets from Trish: one with HTT off, and cpu_idle_hlt=0, and the other with HTT off, and cpu_idle_hlt=1, before figuring this out. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-02-01 Thread Bosko Milekic
PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-02-01 Thread Bosko Milekic
. -Matt Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-02-01 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:47:59PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: Bosko Milekic wrote: On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:52:53AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: Another solution would be to have a global mask of 'idle' cpus and send an IPI to them when a new KSE is scheduled on a non-idle

Re: Hyperthreading and machdep.cpu_idle_hlt

2003-02-01 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: Bosko Milekic wrote: Or, as I explained in my previous post, only HLT the [virtual] CPU if the other [virtual] CPU that is sharing the same execution cache units is not HLT'd itself. If the other one is HLT'd

Re: TCP connections timing out real fast

2003-02-22 Thread Bosko Milekic
. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: CURRENT kernel freezing or rebooting

2003-02-22 Thread Bosko Milekic
the week with zero problems. Will try again tomorrow morning (1200 GMT) if there are interesting kernel commits. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: mbuf cache

2003-03-04 Thread Bosko Milekic
sent previously had listed. Pete -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: mbuf cache

2003-03-04 Thread Bosko Milekic
instead of -current and -net please (feel free to trim the one you want), getting 3 copies of the same message all the time is kinda annoying. :-( -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current

Re: mbuf cache

2003-03-04 Thread Bosko Milekic
for now. I have a patch that changes that but I haven't committed it yet because I left for vacation last Sunday and I only returned early this Monday. Since then, I've been too busy to clean up and commit it. In about a week or so you should notice a difference. -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL

Re: mbuf cache

2003-03-04 Thread Bosko Milekic
to seperate routines, but I'm not clear that this is very useful, given that mb_free()'s usage is restricted to only inside subr_mbuf.c Pete -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

Re: mbuf cache

2003-03-07 Thread Bosko Milekic
reproduce it. Have you tried running your tests over loopback to see if the same thing happens? If so, and it does, can you please explain how to exactly replicate the test? -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: mbuf cache

2003-03-07 Thread Bosko Milekic
(in which case the auxilary routines should register the higher CPU usage). -- Bosko Milekic * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: mbuf LOR

2003-04-02 Thread Bosko Milekic
() to malloc(), so they must be happening higher up in the call stack. The lock reversal was: 1. fxp softc lock, 2. Giant. Traceback: zalloc... malloc() mb_pop_cont() mb_alloc() m_getcl() fxp_add_rfabuf() fxp_intr_body() fxp_intr() -- locks fxp softc -Nate -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL

Re: KSE kernel comparissons

2001-08-27 Thread Bosko Milekic
. -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: ACPI??? was - Re: -current TCP performance hosed?

2001-09-15 Thread Bosko Milekic
to occur very recently, this may be a worthy piece of information. Thanks. Geoff. -- Geoff Rehmet, Internet Solutions tel: +27-11-283-5462, fax: +27-11-283-5401 mobile: +27-83-292-5800 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.is.co.za -- Bosko Milekic

Re: -current TCP performance hosed?

2001-09-14 Thread Bosko Milekic
-- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: send_packet: No buffer space available

2001-11-21 Thread Bosko Milekic
long... Bye, Andrea -- Tagline generated by 'gensig' mail-client-independent .signature generator. Get your copy at http://www.geeks.com/~robf/gensig/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message -- Bosko Milekic

Re: send_packet: No buffer space available

2001-11-26 Thread Bosko Milekic
than 50 but practically, you probably won't get much besides for consuming more memory for the output queue. Bye, Andrea -- The best things in life are free, but the expensive ones are still worth a look. -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: MEXTFREE

2001-12-22 Thread Bosko Milekic
this? It should stay like this. The easy (macro) case deals with only the reference count issue. We only call the function if we really have to free the object (i.e. ref count is dropped to zero). Thanks. -- Chad David[EMAIL PROTECTED] ACNS Inc. Calgary, Alberta Canada -- Bosko Milekic

Re: Junior Annoying Hacker Task

2002-02-01 Thread Bosko Milekic
to find out that they had been moving towards an idea that Microsoft had developed, but wouldn't this be a fun tweak to people's tails? 8-) 8-) 8-) -- Terry -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd

Re: Patch to improve mutex collision performance

2002-02-18 Thread Bosko Milekic
and putting ourselves to sleep). So, in effect, it's a non-issue. -Matt Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Bosko Milekic
of FreeBSD (as opposed to [totally broke and bleeding] developer [for those who feel like it] version of FreeBSD.). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Bosko Milekic
, -CURRENT is broken and it's probably because of me but I have no friggin' clue how or why. I don't even know where to start looking. It's just common sense. On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote: On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 06:24:39PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Thumbs up and big

Re: malloc_bucket() idea (was Re: How to fix malloc.)

2002-02-23 Thread Bosko Milekic
allocators. It will support per CPU working-sets and some cache friendly goodies. -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: (URGENT) Instant panic in _MEXT_ALLOC_CNT

2000-08-19 Thread Bosko Milekic
Hrmmm, there may be a logic problem here. Try this (apply it manually, as I am not able to produce a diff at this time): change: if ((__mcnt == NULL) (m_alloc_ref(1) == 0)) panic("mbuf subsystem: out of ref counts!"); to: if (__mcnt == NULL) { if

Re: Kernel panic on fxp

2000-08-22 Thread Bosko Milekic
=0 current process = 0 (swapper) interrupt mask = net tty bio cam - SMP:XXX trap number = 12 panic: page fault Cheers, Bosko. -- Bosko Milekic * Voice/Mobile: 514.865.7738 * Pager: 514.921.0237 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.technokratis.com/ To Unsubscribe

Re: Proposal to clarify mbuf handling rules

2000-08-28 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, David Malone wrote: [...] (This is why the flag I was talking about in the other mail would be useful for spotting other cases where the storage may be writable, even if it's not a cluster). Thoughts: 1) The mbuf should be marked read-only explicitly with

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_socket2.c

2000-08-31 Thread Bosko Milekic
;-). (See 'current' and 'stable' maillists for more detailed description of the problem). N.Dudorov Cheers, Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: page fault in sched_ithd

2000-09-09 Thread Bosko Milekic
uot;unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

mbuf system with mutexes

2000-09-10 Thread Bosko Milekic
trying to do this as closly as possible with Alfred's work, so Alfred, maybe you can also glance at point (f) above as well... :-) Cheers, Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: No buffer space available errors

2000-09-18 Thread Bosko Milekic
committed at any point in time (yet), so the problem can only be similar, at best (in any case, a `netstat -m' should offer a clue). Regards, Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Locking doc.?

2000-09-22 Thread Bosko Milekic
. -- __--_|\ Julian Elischer / \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( OZ) World tour 2000 --- X_.---._/ presently in: Perth v Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Locking doc.?

2000-09-22 Thread Bosko Milekic
/ \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( OZ) World tour 2000 --- X_.---._/ presently in: Perth v Later, Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

[HEADS-UP] mbuf mutex code going in...

2000-10-05 Thread Bosko Milekic
of all issues as soon as possible, if necessary. :-) If all goes well, more commits, some adding important functionality, to follow... Regards, Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i

Re: page fault while in kernel mode

2000-10-05 Thread Bosko Milekic
PROTECTED] No man knows how bad he is till he has tried very hard to be good. -- C.S. Lewis Regards, Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: latest ahc panic, more data ...

2000-10-07 Thread Bosko Milekic
@{postgresql|isc}.org ICQ#7615664 Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Panic m_copydata, negative off out of tcp_output

2000-10-13 Thread Bosko Milekic
public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Another broken buildworld?

2000-10-15 Thread Bosko Milekic
/src/usr.sbin/ppp/atm.c:186: for each function it appears in.) /usr/src/usr.sbin/ppp/atm.c:169: warning: unused variable `sock' *** Error code 1 ... I don't know who/what broke this. Anybody have any ideas? Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: sockstat causing OS lockups

2000-10-19 Thread Bosko Milekic
provide additional details? This is on -CURRENT from 10/16. You should have debugging enabled in your kernel, then you can provide, at least, a stack trace. Please see the relevant handbook section for more information. The hardware is: [...] Regards, Bosko Milekic [EMAIL

Re: Multiply defined 'struct mtx' ?

2000-10-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
subscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

  1   2   >