On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Karl Pielorz wrote:
Am I still safe to do the equivalent of a 'remote' install world? - I have 2 x
3.0 boxes, one which is fresh 3.0-RELEASE, the other which is 3.0-CURRENT...
If I take the /usr/src /usr/obj directories from sucsessful 'buildworld' on
the -current
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Igor Shulgin wrote:
What I have done wrong?
Is it possible to run Apache 1.3.x on FreeBSD 3.0 ?
Yes but you need to install a more recent port or package. The
conversion to ELF tripped up a few things like Apache that didn't
know about ELF FreeBSD systems. That is all
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
Gentlemen, I don't intend to add yet another keymap to
/usr/share/syscons/keymaps. I am merely trying to define a reasonable
set of common, consistent key binding for existing keymaps.
National keyboards have different layout of regular keys.
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
I'm experiencing some strange errors with one of our workstations. I
recently moved all of our workstations to 3.0 current as of 1998-12-18.
Does any of this make any sense to anyone:
trumpet:~rlogin balalaika
netd in free(): warning: junk
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, HighWind Software Information wrote:
Can someone summarize the difference and locations between all these
things?
Think of it as a tree where the trunk is -current and branches are
-stable. There is only one -current but potentally many -stables.
Each release with a new
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Andreas Klemm wrote:
What do you think ? Or what are your experiences ?
It has caused a lot of grief with my recent install of
3.0-19990205, but I gather I'm supposed to install something
later before complaining.
The main annoyance has been that running /stand/sysinstall
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 09:27:44AM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
PlatformHas DHCP
Irix 6.5Yes
Solaris 2.5.1 No
Solaris 2.6 Yes
You should have used a more modern
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, jack wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I think it's a *BAD* idea to change rc.conf operation for the 3.1
distribution. Bad Bad Bad.
I have to agree. Let's not forget that there are over 30 man
pages with references to /etc/rc.conf.
Lets
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, jack wrote:
If /etc/rc.conf only contains changes from the defaults when
man something_or_other tells the user to find and edit
something_or_other_flags in /etc/rc.conf the entry won't be
there to edit.
Why must it contain only changes? Is there any reason it
couldn't
On 13 Feb 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Nicolas Souchu nso...@teaser.fr writes:
controller ppbus0 # The ppbus system
device nlpt0 at ppbus? # The printer driver
OBTW, when are you planning to rename nlpt0 to lpt0?
Hopefully before 3.1 goes
On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 07:36:37PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
FWIW, I would also like to see this happen.
What's the deadline? I did it for -current this day. I'm waiting for
some feedback before the 3.1 replica.
Actually,
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Try reducing maxusers to 128. Another person reported similar behavior
to me and after a bunch of work he tried going back to a basic
distribution -- and everything started working again.
It turned out that a maxusers value of 256
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
wcslen()
wcscpy()
wcsncpy()
wcscat()
wcscmp()
wcsncmp()
How come FreeBSD doesn't have these? Is there a complicated problem
preventing us from adding them?
I have a start at all the wc functions in the NA1 of ANSI C which
includes
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote:
There's no mechanism for updating a package - and it's not clear (to
me anyway) how this can be done safely in a general way. Where the
update is only minor (and won't affect the dependent packages), you
can use something like:
For an update to work,
14 matches
Mail list logo
