Re: freebsd web based groupware

1999-07-04 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Sam, Your email sounds good. the web site looks fine. but sending this message to three different lists (so far, i hope there are not others) is very near to spamming us. i sincerely hope that you have not sent this message to additional lists. jmb -- Jonathan M. Bresler

Re: bounced mail

1999-09-23 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
I am seeing bounced mail from -current since this evening. The message is: 550 service unavailable; [207.93.148.150] blocked using \ dul.maps.vix.com I tried disconnecting from my ISP and redialing to change the IP. Same results. My ISP, netcom (now mindspring) has no idea.

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-23 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Don, excellent idea. i have expanded upon it and added it to freebsd.mc. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Why do FreeBSD mailing lists ignore MX preference?

1999-09-24 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Non-authoritative answer: zuhause.mn.org preference = 150, mail exchanger = minuet.skypoint.net zuhause.mn.org preference = 100, mail exchanger = 205.215.217.178 postfix does not like your numeric MX record Sep 24 01:35:46 hub postfix/smtp[77991]: warning: valid_hostname: numeric

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-24 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
*!) A few random manual checks seem to indicate that the DUL would do much better for me. insert plug for the FreeBSDcon talk "Stopping Spam--Five Years in the Trenches" by Jonathan M Bresler ;P jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-curre

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-24 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
One of us, at least, evidently. How much mail does the use of the MAPS DUL reject? varies sharply from day to day. since 8/31 dul has rejected 93 connection attempts. map has rejected 361 connection attempts. How much of that do you think is worth rejecting?

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-26 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
stopping chat on the tech lists is an open research project ;) jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: The eventual fate of BLOCK devices.

1999-10-10 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
FWIW, I got unsubscribed, too. While I were at it, I sent a "which" command to the majordomo, and the result did not list me as a member of freebsd-announce and freebsd-security- notifications. When I tried to re-subscribe, it told me that I am already subscribed... Seems like

Re: Majordomo problems (Re: The eventual fate of BLOCK devices.)

1999-10-10 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
send it to postmaster instead. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: The eventual fate of BLOCK devices.

1999-10-10 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Here's the whole story: - I sent a "which" command from the newsgate account. - Got a response with about 30 lists to which that account is subscribed. - Compared those lists to the lists that the newsgate is prepared to handle (and to which it was once subscribed). -

Re: People getting automatically unsub'ed from -arch

1999-10-11 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
"Accidental" removals from the lists are so common that I give up. I no longer even try to get back on them -- it's been happening for _years_ now, and I have made multiple complaints about it, and if it's not a problem for whoever runs the mailing lists, then I just don't care that much.

Re: MajorDomo Problems

1999-10-11 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
yesyou or your provider was bouncing your email. i unsubscribed you on Oct 07 05:40:22. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: People getting automatically unsub'ed from -arch

1999-10-11 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nate Williams) "Accidental" removals from the lists are so common that I give up. I no longer even try to get back on them -- it's been happening for _years_ now, and I have made multiple complaints about it, and if it's not a problem for whoever runs

Re: People getting automatically unsub'ed from -arch

1999-10-11 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
"Accidental" removals from the lists are so common that I give up. I no longer even try to get back on them -- it's been happening for _years_ now, and I have made multiple complaints about it, and if it's not a problem for whoever runs the mailing lists, then I just don't care

Re: People getting automatically unsub'ed from -arch

1999-10-11 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Sean, you are subscribed in different ways to different lists. cvs-all:[EMAIL PROTECTED] freebsd-alpha:[EMAIL PROTECTED] freebsd-bugs:[EMAIL PROTECTED] freebsd-chat:[EMAIL PROTECTED] freebsd-config:[EMAIL PROTECTED] freebsd-current:[EMAIL PROTECTED] freebsd-emulation:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: People getting automatically unsub'ed from -arch

1999-10-11 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Five years of people finding themselves mysteriously removed from lists, with no response other than, "Oh, I just remove people automatically without warning if I get too many bounces, and, no, I don't have any bounces from you but that must have been what happened." some people

Re: People getting automatically unsub'ed from -arch

1999-10-12 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
thanks for the note on bouncefilter. i'll take a look at it. may be just what i am looking for.. may be better than what i am using already. always interested in somethatngthat will help me do this better. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"

Re: The eventual fate of BLOCK devices.

1999-10-12 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Sybase can use either block devices or raw disk. We run all our databases, Sybase, Oracle, etc. on raw disk. the database engineers here would kill me if i were to ask them to use a block device rather than raw disk. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe

Re: People getting automatically unsub'ed from -arch

1999-10-13 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Ben, Majordomo has this facility, sending periodic reminder messages; it is the bounces mailing list . I used it for a couple months. The results were less than satisfactory. Most people stayed on the bounces mailing list indefinately. ;( jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: People getting automatically unsub'ed from -arch

1999-10-14 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
listar.orgi'll take a look. thanks for the pointer. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: People getting automatically unsub'ed from -arch

1999-10-14 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
finished, pending acquistion of a round tuit. Olliver Robert should be able to get on in France and bring it to the FreeBSDCon. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: LinkSys probe locks up some NE2000 clones (was: ed0 hangs at boot)

1999-10-31 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
The LinkSys probe code (in particular the checksum at the start of ed_get_Linksys()) causes my no-name ISA NE2000 clone to lock the machine up. I guess you have the same problem. ouch! not goodwhat is the ethernet address of your ne2000 clone? jmb To Unsubscribe: send

Linksys conflicts with NE2000

1999-10-31 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
okay i have changed the order in which we test for NE1000, NE2000, and the Linksys (dl10016c ? ethernet controller). pleazse test and let me know how this patch does. hopefully the problem will be solved. does *ANYONE* have an NE1000, the can test? before adding in teh Linksys we tested:

Re: ambiguity between -STABLE and -RELEASE

1999-11-08 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
just a very basic question that would resolve a dispute between colleagues. When one talks about Fbsd3.3-STABLE my impression is that such version is a stage before the Fbsd3.3-RELEASE. In other words the -RELEASE is for the final version and the -STABLE is the version that is soon

Re: current.freebsd.org (FTP)

2000-02-29 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Forrest Aldrich wrote: Is not allowing anonymous ftp logins. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message I noticed this too... Maybe there's too many users, and is refusing connections? Hmmm... ??? a

No Subject

2000-03-30 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
NEVER send test messages to any FreeBSD mailing list but freebsd-test. doing so can result in you being filtered from all the freebsd mailing lists. jmb From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yellow Dog Communications Inc) Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk

Re: Vinum breakage

2000-04-05 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
I've tracked down two bugs in vinum's raid5 implementation and submitted a tentitive patch to Greg for evaluation. It seems to fix the panics I was able to reproduce. The patch is available (but note that once Greg commits the real fix, you need to wipe it before you

Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday

2000-04-23 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
BTW; whilst I think Poul was entirely the wrong person to raise the issue, I agree that you probably want to hang back on MFCing the linux scripting changes for a week or so. This is really just common sense. recently i added autoload to a usb related kernel module. very handy

Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compatibility

2000-04-24 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
The network stack is equally easy to make MP-safe. In this case we have a shared lock to lookup sockets for host/port combinations and then fine-grained exclusive locks within those sockets. Route table and other high level operations could in fact remain BGL'd without

Re: Possible bug in netinet6/in6_rmx.c ?

2000-07-07 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
By the way, while we are talking about sysctl, I don't suppose you would be willing to review/commit PR 15251? It is a fairly straightforward patch that I see Jonathan Bresler took it (today). wow dude! put me on the spot or something! jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to

recent list problems

2001-11-19 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
, there are just too many of them. please send me email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) regarding any list that is getting too much spam (please include a copy of the spam email complete with all headers.) jmb -- Jonathan M. BreslerFreeBSD Postmaster[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD--The Power to Serve

Re: fxp driver not reset after Windows reboot?

2000-12-16 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Andrzej, did you receive a response regarding your email the Intel Pro 10/100B/100+ Ethernet being unresponsive after running windows? i seem to have the same problem. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

kern/kern_malloc.c:malloc_init() called twice on devbuf

1999-12-08 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
[this is a brand spanking new kernel, just compiled 41 minutes ago cvsup'ped just this morning] i was reading the kern_malloc code teh other day and wondered why we have code to return is the malloc_init() has already been dont on that type.well, we call malloc_init() twice on devbuf.

Re: HEADSUP: wd driver will be retired!

1999-12-08 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
[snip] We gained quite a bit from it, but let's not rewrite history. I remember quite clearly that there was a very popular Adaptec SCSI controller missing when the switch to CAM was made, and a lot of [snip] we lost teh aic controller at that time. [snip] Again, this is

Re: HEADSUP: wd driver will be retired!

1999-12-09 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
[snip] Again, this is not accurate. I have a laptop with which, two months ago, I could use my LinkSys ethernet card, and I could use my digital then we need to get your LinkSys ethernet card support fixed. i am using one to write this message. mine is a LinkSys 10/100 PCMCIA

Re: HEADSUP: wd driver will be retired!

1999-12-09 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
What version of -CURRENT are you using? Mine is a PCMPC200, and I haven't been able to get it to work for 6 weeks. PCMPC100 LinkSys PCMCIA 10/100 jmb Greg, yours is a card bus card. it is not supported at this time. i have one right next to me with the label melted.

Re: Kernel config utility

1999-12-15 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
I can definitely see advanatages, not that I would use it myself. :-) I also think that if it was written properly, which I'm sure that it would be, it could also be used to setup ppp etc.. By clicking on the icons, a properties pane would show the properties for this device. Of

Re: Your misleading, no, LYING message to me

2000-01-03 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 19:30:12 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [snip] The proper tactic to resolve the conflict should have been to wait a cool off period and then slug it off technically. Nevertheless, instead of waiting for Karl to cool off and attempt to ration with

Re: Your misleading, no LYING message to me

2000-01-03 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Sam, If you believe that either 1. someone removed Karl from the freebsd-current list or 2. that someone is covering this up, please call me at 410-320-7108. thanks jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: ppp, incoming mail keeping the line up.

2000-01-17 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
I run user-ppp, and I have a mx-record for my system, so incoming mail = goes directly to my system. this is asking for trouble. you should get yourself an MX that is online all the time and will store your mail for you. you can then pick it up whenever you want using APOP or POP

Re: lpt0

1999-02-14 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 19:17:14 +0100 From: Nicolas Souchu nso...@teaser.fr You need: controllerppbus0 # The ppbus system devicenlpt0 at ppbus? # The printer driver And finally the parallel port chipset interface, controllerppc0at

Re: listproc problem?

1999-02-24 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
From: Thomas T. Veldhouse ve...@visi.com Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 13:42:37 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Re: SPAM

1999-05-10 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
From: Seamus Wassman wass...@direct.ca Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 20:31:00 -0700 I was quite surprised the First Time I got SPAM through this mailing list, I thought for sure there would be someone to moderate it so that no garbage gets through, I personally find it quite offensive to get

Re: SPAM

1999-05-10 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Delivered-To: j...@hub.freebsd.org Cc: curr...@freebsd.org References: 19990510173115.0aaf815...@hub.freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 22:14:56 +0200 From: Mark Murray m...@grondar.za Jonathan M. Bresler wrote: with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer would

Re: SPAM

1999-05-10 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
On Mon, 10 May 1999 22:14:56 +0200, Mark Murray m...@grondar.za said: Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are there difficulties that make this impossible? Yes, there are. i forgot to mention that such a policy creates a single allowed address per

Re: SPAM

1999-05-10 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 13:49:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Steven P. Donegan done...@quick.net I have received more email today related to SPAM than I have actual SPAM in the last month+ What has triggered this solution looking for a problem? that is an eloquent statement of the situat

Re: FTP passive mode - a new default?

1999-05-26 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Unless I hear unanimous fierce outcry against it, I'm strongly considering making FTP_PASSIVE_MODE obsolete by virtue of being the default for all tools/libraries which currently examine it. FTP_ACTIVE_MODE will be the new flag for toggling the previous behavior. Given the state of the

Re: FTP passive mode - a new default?

1999-05-26 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
do any apps check for FTP_ACTIVE_MODE? are we going to apply patches to each app to check for this and maintains those patches over the course of time? seems to be a change without commensurate benefit.it will confuse some, suprise others and doesnt seem to

Re: net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive on as default ?

1999-06-01 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
From: Poul-Henning Kamp p...@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 20:41:00 +0200 Considering the number of hosts on the net today, which come and go with no warning and with dynamic IP assignments, I would propose that we disregard what the old farts felt about TCP keepalives, and enable