Re: Lack of real long double support

2002-10-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Thus spake M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : : No. You should assume that for i386, at least, that long double will : : have the right LDBL_ constants. I've had them in my local tree for : : about 3 months

Re: HEADS UP: you need to install a new kernel before aninstallworld.

2002-10-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Peter Wemm wrote: : : 'make installworld' without ... a new kernel would be rather messy. : : ... a reminder of the sequence is probably in order: : buildworld : buildkernel : installkernel : reboot :

Re: Kernel breakage?

2002-10-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I think UPDATING hasn't been updated on this, but there was a change in : the format printing for printf that conflicts with the ddb format : printing. You need to rebuild your gcc. For dumb stuff like this, I

Re: Networking

2002-10-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Niklas Johannes Saers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Hi all, : I'm wondering a bit on the state of the network-drivers in -CURRENT. : On my laptop running a fairly recent -CURRENT whenever I do a : ifconfig an0 inet 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 : my

Re: HEADS UP: you need to install a new kernel before aninstallworld.

2002-10-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : : Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : : ... 'installkernel' is not filling it's contract: it is : : not ensuring that the next boot uses the new kernel. : : Are you sure you

Re: HEADS UP: you need to install a new kernel before aninstallworld.

2002-10-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : If it does need them, somebody had better tell my systems. I've got old : 3.x bootblocks on some of them. Sorry, you are right. : /boot/loader though is a different story. 'make installkernel' does not : install

Re: Lack of real long double support

2002-10-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I'd like to see Bruce's issues with the 64 bit support taken care : of with long double (and the implicit cast that occurs in the one : case that Bruce complained about in his email, where there is *too : much*

Re: NEWCARD and Linksys PCM200 ver. 2 CardBus Ethernet

2002-10-29 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Garrett Wollman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Has anyone managed to make one of these work? I get the following : messages: : : cardbus1: Expecting link target, got 0x59 : cardbus1: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=100 : cardbus1: Resource not

Re: HEADS UP: you need to install a new kernel before aninstallworld.

2002-10-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : This should go on the Comprehensive guide to updating from source to 5.0 : that I'm sure our trusty release engineers are producing? UPDATING has the closest thing to a comprehensive guide. As far as I can tell, it

Re: Lack of real long double support

2002-10-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Loren James Rittle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : This works. I'm not sure why this isn't the default. It looks like

Re: [PATCH] NEWCARD: pccardc power support

2002-10-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mitsuru IWASAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I've implemented pccardc power and boot_deactivated support code for : NEWCARD. They are needed for some mobile users including me. : : - Add pccardc power support code. Yes, it's OLDCARD compatible. : - Add

Re: NEWCARD and Linksys PCM200 ver. 2 CardBus Ethernet

2002-10-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Garrett Wollman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:52:22 -0500 (EST), John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: : I used to use one. The dc(4) driver was broken a while back and : now has issues with this card that it didn't used to have, but

Re: Lack of real long double support

2002-10-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : The reasons are the same as they used to be: incomplete language support : and incomplete library support. Language support is being completed but : is far from here yet. See the paper referenced in Loren's reply

Re: Lack of real long double support

2002-10-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : And there's a comment: : * 64-bit precision often gives bad results with high level languages : * because it makes the results of calculations depend on whether : * intermediate

Re: libc size

2002-10-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Terry Lambert wrote: : Nate Lawson wrote: : Here is a link to the size of various components of libc, sorted by text : size. If you can find some way to reduce or even remove some of this, : please submit a

Re: disklabel with fresh drive

2002-10-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : I'm trying to install fresh 5.0-current from self-baked ISO. : : But when I select fresh drive at Configure - Label in sysinstall, : sysinstall stalls (title, table, synopsis is printed, but no Part : rows). I

Re: Lack of real long double support

2002-10-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : This : example shows that we don't support it in printf, since the above : example does ***NOT*** give +Inf, but rather whatever 2*DBL_MAX is. : : That would be +Inf for double values... a 53 bit +Inf. But :

Re: Lack of real long double support

2002-10-31 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : : This : : example shows that we don't support it in printf, since the above : : example does ***NOT*** give +Inf, but rather whatever 2*DBL_MAX is. : : [ ... ] : : Terry you

Re: [PATCH] NEWCARD: pccardc power support

2002-10-31 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mitsuru IWASAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : BTW, I think that some developers are interested in devd. : Do we have mailing list for it? Not currently. I can create one if people are interested. I've also been thinking of a good way we can have the above

Re: Lack of real long double support

2002-10-31 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : M. Warner Losh wrote: : : : I await an explanation of how you can fit 2

Re: libc size

2002-11-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wesley Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : And of course the answer to that is to create a /lib. Something that I : would *never ever* want to see. Sure, a few people might throw around the : idea of an extremely light-weight set of libraries to go into

Re: A few questions

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On 2002-10-31 18:39, Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off : very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. : [...] :

Re: fdisk -BI ob clean disk broken

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On 4.x I have been using a slightly modified version of Warner's diskprep : to write new compact flashes. On -current fdisk die with signal 8 (Floating : point exception) when this part of the script runs: : :

Re: CNet CNWLC-811 (PRISM2), kernel panic

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
Does this happen with OLDCARD? I have a couple of cards that do this, but haven't been able to track down why this happens. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Minimal install

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
I'm downloading current snapshots. I was wondering what the minimum set of files I needed to download to do a minimal install. I'm guessing just floppies, base, or maybe floppies, base and crypto. (I'm installing on pc98 machine, so need floppies). Is this documented anywhere, or should I

Re: fdisk -BI ob clean disk broken

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Hmmm. I just noticed that the disks probe with zero values for the : heads, sectors/track and cylinders. I have tried two different USB : CF readers and both do it. On 4.x it probes with the correct values : on the same

Re: CNet CNWLC-811 (PRISM2), kernel panic

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frode Nordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : With OLDCARD it does not crash! I'll answer this twice... Can I ask you to do the following: pccardc pccard_mem pccardc pccard_mem 0xf800 pccardc dumpcis (well, where 0xf800 is the same address that

Re: CNet CNWLC-811 (PRISM2), kernel panic

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frode Nordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I get the following output from the driver: : wi0 at port 0x240-0x27f irq 11 slot 1 on pccard1 : wi0: timeout in wi_cmd 0x; event status 0x : wi0: timeout in wi_cmd 0x; event status 0x : wi0:

Re: __sF

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 09:47:26AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: : On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:35:03AM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: : : So is the current position on the matter that __sF is going to remain out :

Re: __sF

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1755928+1759974+/usr/local/\ : www/db/text/2002/freebsd-current/20021013.freebsd-current You should be linking against the -stable versions of these items as well as the

Re: __sF

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 06:15:09PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: : On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Mark Murray wrote: : This shouldn't be a problem. The commercial software Should Not Be(tm) : supporting something as

Re: __sF

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Maybe I misunderstand you. But, a person running FreeBSD 5.x, : who wants to runs this vendor's 4.x software, will need to : build their libc with WANT_COMPAT4_STDIO defined if this : product needs to see __sF. All

Re: Ghost of __sF and COMPAT4X libraries.

2002-11-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : The following 4.7 libs make reference to __sF. Several of the : corresponding 5.0 libraries still have the same version number. : We may need to bump the version numbers. : : libalias.so.4libbz2.so.1

Re: __sF

2002-11-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Then you should seriously consider the quality of such application, or : whether you'd be better using it on an actual and supported platform. : : Anything less would be uncivilised. (Seriously) Sometimes you

Re: umass CF geometry problems, was Re: fdisk -BI ob clean diskbroken

2002-11-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : We should obviously fix it. I have no idea what is possible in USB : devices in this respect. Nor do I. Maybe there's some SCSI command that we can send that is well defined enough to work often enough.

Re: umass CF geometry problems, was Re: fdisk -BI ob clean diskbroken

2002-11-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : What is the GET_GEOMETRY used for anyway? : : Well the short version of the problem is that fdisk -BI disk works : on -stable to get a FreeBSD partition on the Compact Flash. This does : not work on -current anymore.

Re: libc size

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Several people have pointed out that FreeBSD has : certain protections against LD_LIBRARY_PATH exploits, : but there are still real questions here. (Kernel : races, possibly?) Privilege elevation is an :

Re: What's the status of devfs(8)?

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Lankford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : but /dev/devctl is in my /dev (devfs) partition. /dev/devctl has nothing to do with devfs. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Netgraph and KQUEUE(2)

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
: 1) Device driver in Netgraph node. When hardware is :activated new Netgraph node is created and new :kevent sent. devd (or something like devd) listens :for these events and does something (loads firmware, :activates device, etc.) Device drivers are not netgraph nodes. They

Re: What is user uucp good for?

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : For that matter, do we still need xten, a user who has been pushed so far : to the edge of obscurity that it's home directory doesn't even exist on a : freshly installed system (and I'm not talking about

Re: GEOM/libdisk problem on pc98

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takahashi Yoshihiro : writes: : The test program for libdisk is a failure in pc98 disks. : : I wonder at why pc98 disks don't have their type ('ty') in the result : of

Re: Netgraph and KQUEUE(2)

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : : On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : : 1) Device driver in Netgraph node. When hardware is : :activated new Netgraph node is created and new : :kevent sent. devd (or something like devd

Re: pccard state after ACPI resume

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: 010501c285dc$87da1170$[EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : This also happens with my an0 card, so it's probably a larger ACPI + PCCARD : interoperability issue. Its a ACPI issue. We do the right things in the drivers and bridge drivers. Do the

Re: Some problems with Orinoco card in -CURRENT

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
Strange. OLDCARD or NEWCARD? Send me a full dmesg for each case, since it is likely some resource conflict or another. I do what you've described hundreds of times over the past few months, so it has to be something weird with your computer. Warner. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: pccard state after ACPI resume

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frode Nordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 23:22, M. Warner Losh wrote: : In message: 010501c285dc$87da1170$[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : This also happens with my an0 card, so it's

Re: pccard state after ACPI resume

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frode Nordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 23:38, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : wi0 detaches and reattaches here (both in sleep state 1 and 3). : : OK. OLDCARD or NEWCARD? My laptop still doesn't suspend/resume : correctly, so I've

Re: [current] Re: What is user uucp good for?

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] David Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M == M Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : M In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ceri Davies : M [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : For that matter, do we still : M need xten, a user who has been pushed so far

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Could someone add the following patch to UPDATING? : Change the words to whatever suits your fancy. I'm trying to devise a good way to deal with this breakage and hope it is transient. I'm not hopeful :-( I'll

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh said: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : Could someone add the following patch to UPDATING? : : Change the words to whatever suits your

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-07 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh said: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : M. Warner Losh said: : : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : : Steven G. Kargl

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-07 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], : M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : Could someone add the following patch

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-07 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], : M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : : FWIW, the only OS fix that will make stock ezm3

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-07 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : Gotcha. I'm thinking very seriously about keeping __sF support (but : creating no new binaries with it in it) and the freeze on sizeof(FILE) : through the 5.x series of releases because

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-07 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Hear hear, I agree. There's no need to expose what ought to be : private data to the world, especially when we can get the additional : benefit here of letting us play with the implementation. -current already does

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 8 02:45:04 2002 : Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 00:39:35 -0700 (MST) : To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Subject: Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING : From: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : All the ports are going to be rebuilt for the release anyways, : so this doesn't affect fresh installs, correct? It is only a : problem when mixing older 4.x and 5.0 libraries/binaries with : __sF-free libc (if I

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:17:00PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: : On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : : Yes, but this is too painful. If we were going to do this, the time : for the pain was 6-9

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Here's the fun part. The following 5.0 libraries have the same : version number as their 4.x counterparts. Try running a 4.x : app linked against one of these libaries on a 5.0 machine. You : should also note that

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : All the ports are going to be rebuilt for the release anyways, : : so

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 04:16:06PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: : I'd love for there to be a way to know which binaries use __sF. : : The following script run on your bin, sbin, lib, and libexec directories : does

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : If you can't agree on a coordinate system (OLDCARD? NEWCARD? : REDCARD? BLUECARD?), then at least agree to get rid of data : interfaces; Ironically, NEWCARD and OLDCARD are driver compatible because it doesn't

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-10 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : If the final word on this whole issue is You can't run binaries : compiled for 4.x-RELEASE on 5.x-RELEASE then we should start puckering : up. : : Developers tend to remember these things and you don't have to

Re: Value 0xd0d0d0d0 ?

2002-11-10 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aurelien Nephtali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I would like to know where/when the value 0xd0d0d0d0 is assigned to a pointer ? : Sometimes I have some pointers which have a correct value before and suddenly : they got this odd 0xd0d0d0d0 value :/ That's a

Re: buildkernel failure

2002-11-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
pcic isn't supported with NEWCARD yet :-) I'll fix it none-the-less. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Warning messages emitted by disklabel -r

2002-11-18 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vallo Kallaste [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : partition c: partition extends past end of unit : Warning, partition c doesn't start at 0! : Warning, An incorrect partition c may cause problems for standard system utilities : partition e: partition extends past

Re: Device permissions with DEVFS

2002-11-19 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I'm glad you brought this up... I'd like to see /dev/devctl made mode 600 : instead of 644 because it does not look very robust and because only one : devctl can be open at a time. 644 is the right permissions to

Re: cbb0: unsupported card type and reboot

2002-11-19 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Hi, : : I'm trying to install 5.0DP2 on my Dell Inspiron 2650 laptop. : Everything : seems to be going fine until I get a: : : cbb0: unsupported card type detected : : at this stage, the machine reboots a

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-20 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wilkinson,Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD and create a framework to do :crossbuilds ? : : http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200211/xdevnetbsd.html FreeBSD already has cross builds for a while, since

Re: buildkernel broken at bluetooth?

2002-11-20 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : My /usr/src is a symlink to another partition which is mounted : on /usr/local/mnt/src. I can make it compile by modifying the : Makefiles in sys/modules/netgraph/bluetooth like this: : : CFLAGS+=

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-21 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Wilkinson,Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD

Re: Why isn't NOCLEAN the default?

2002-11-21 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Thus spake John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : Make release is a very poor example b/c make release goes to great : efforts to create a clean-room environment for a release. make : rerelease is quite helpful

Re: Compiling -CURRENT and PCMCIA support.

2002-11-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: 1037904653.74226.21.camel@lobo Ryan Sommers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Is the kernel on the 5.0SP2 ISO built with PCCard support? Yes. : I installed : from CD-ROM onto a Compaq laptop only to notice nothing about the PCMCIA : Ethernet card I had in the dmesg output.

Re: Bluetooth questions

2002-11-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : PCCARD: 3COM and Xircom(*). Xircom card is a 16550A : UART based card and may not work very well because of : sio driver issues. The same is true for any 16550A : UART based card. However if you can convince

Re: malloc(0) broken?

2002-11-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marc Recht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : A malloc(0) returns always 0x800 on my system. This causes some third-party : software to fail, because they expect malloc(0) to return NULL. Is this a : bug or a feature? malloc(3) doesn't mention anything.

Re: wlan device fails with latest CURRENT

2002-11-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Hi, : : just installed DP2 on my IBM Thinkpad R32 and updated to the latest : -CURRENT. : My wlan device (Prism 2.5, internal, no pccard) fails at bootup: : : wi0: Intersil Prism2.5 mem 0xf800-0xf8000fff

Re: pccardd in DP2

2002-11-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard Tobin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I now have DP2 running on my Vaio Z600 laptop, and I'm trying to get my : wireless ethernet running. : : The cardbus is detected: : : kernel: cbb0: RF5C475 PCI-CardBus Bridge at device 12.0 on pci0 : kernel:

Re: Bluetooth questions

2002-11-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I see a lot of silo overflow errors under moderate load. : As a result bytes get dropped on the floor. The Bluetooth : spec defines extremely simple serial protocol (H4). It simply : cannot tolerate UARTs that

Re: Bluetooth questions

2002-11-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : I see a lot of silo overflow errors under moderate load. : : As a result bytes get dropped on the floor. The

Test/review this patch

2002-11-23 Thread M. Warner Losh
OK. The lightbulb went on this evening on some of the problems we're having with the pci_allow_unsupported_io_ranges stuff. We weren't doing the right thing with prefetchable memory, hence the nvida driver's need to tell people to set this. I'd like to commit the following change, with re

Re: Bluetooth questions

2002-11-23 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : 56k is a silly speed to use. Why not use the normal speed of 57600 : bps or the faster speed of 115200 bps? I haven't got around to updating : the 57600 in the example in /etc/rc.serial although this example became

Re: installworld and stale {include,lib} fun

2002-11-23 Thread M. Warner Losh
I've never ever needed to cleanup lib. Are you sure that's absolutely required? Also, for upgrading from 4.x already has the bit about nuking /usr/include/gcc. I've never needed to do more. What libraries are bad that need to be removed, specifically? Or is this just paranoia inspired?

Re: installworld and stale {include,lib} fun

2002-11-23 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On 2002-11-23 21:13, M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : I've never ever needed to cleanup lib. Are you sure that's absolutely : required? Also, for upgrading from 4.x already has the bit about

Re: PANIC: Most recently used by bus

2002-11-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aurelien Nephtali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I've got a panic by unplugging my NIC then plugging it again and then doing : a dhclient interface. I've attached some informations about the panic. Kill the dhclient after you unplug the interface, but before

Re: PANIC: Most recently used by bus

2002-11-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Aurelien Nephtali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : I've got a panic by unplugging my NIC then plugging it again and then doing : : a dhclient interface. I've attached some

Re: PANIC: Most recently used by bus

2002-11-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aurelien Nephtali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Yes, I think it's a bug too. I've already unplugged/plugged my NIC in the past : without any problem (and always with WITNESS enabled) so maybe it's a new bug : introduced recently, but I've not seen any commit

Re: Cardbus panic with 3com Megahertz

2002-11-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : got a reproducable panic while inserting a 3Com Megahertz 3CCFE575BT : into an up to date -current system. : The card used to work fine with DP1. How up to date? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: missing: usr.bin/rdist - used: ports/net/rdist6

2002-11-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : - Please consider restoring rdist to FreeBSD. Thanks. : : No thanks. It was removed almost 2 years ago because : better alternatives are available. And the number of security problems with rdist are legion. A

Re: DP2 + Thinkpad 660X = PC Card card activation failed

2002-11-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
Try adding hw.pccard.cis_debug=1 to /boot/loader.conf and let me know the results. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: [REPORT] Upgrade from 4.0-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT

2002-12-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel C. Sobral [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : There I go reply to all... sigh : : IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the : *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy : here. ru@ has stepped up to

Re: [REPORT] Upgrade from 4.0-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT

2002-12-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
Hey ru! These patches are only one '/' different from what I build on my 4.3, 4.5 and 4.6.2 systems w/o a new make being installed. All built perfectly! Thanks! Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: [REPORT] Upgrade from 4.0-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT

2002-12-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Um, why? I can even cross-build any of our supported arches on the : 4.0-RELEASE i386 box. This happens almost automatically, as part : of the cross-arch work tasks. I think that there are some build tools that

Re: DP2 + Thinkpad 660X = PC Card card activation failed

2002-12-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: 1038796195.375.7.camel@OutBound Bob Van Valzah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 23:16, M. Warner Losh wrote: : Try adding hw.pccard.cis_debug=1 to /boot/loader.conf and let me know : the results. : : Warner, I knew you'd know what to try next

Re: sys/file.h and POSIX

2002-12-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marc Recht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Why are you specifying a standard and then using features outside its : scope? Either you want a BSD environment (in which case don't specify : The standard is specified to get the standard functions. Eg. if i

Re: sys/file.h and POSIX

2002-12-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marc Recht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : A conforming application cannot make use of facilities outside the : scope of the standard. This means that if you define : _POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L you don't want RPC. : I don't said that the application is

Re: dc(4) problems

2002-12-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
Andy, I'm aware of this problem and have it on my list of things to try to get fixed for 5.0. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Cardbus/dc(4) still broken

2002-12-12 Thread M. Warner Losh
Yup. Known problem with some cards. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Cardbus/dc(4) still broken

2002-12-12 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Yup. Known problem with some cards. : : How do I fix? Fix the dc driver to not suck so much in this reguard. :-) I think that some flags aren't being properly set in the probe routine, but haven't had a chance

Re: Cardbus/dc(4) still broken

2002-12-12 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Fix the dc driver to not suck so much in this reguard. :-) : : I think that some flags aren't being properly set in the probe : routine, but haven't had a chance to look at it in detail. I'm sorry : I don't

Re: 80386 out of GENERIC

2002-12-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I don't feel this is a good decision. (I still have a 486, act as a : small server and a 286 witch is in storage) This basally means that : any one who doesn't have the latest processor can't install FreeBSD. : : No it doesn't

Re: ipfw userland breaks again.

2002-12-15 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : :I disagree with committing this hack; keep it as a local mod if you must. : : : :As to the problem; don't wait for Luigi to fix the ABI problems, do it : :yourself. Good things happen when folks are PO'd and

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >