Hello,
Another problem with my Orinoco card is that after a resume from (ACPI)
sleep, the configuration set on the card is lost, so I have to set the
ssid, wepkey etc again before it can operate properly.
I am not sure if this is a flaw in the wi0 driver (probably not) or
something missing
In message: 010501c285dc$87da1170$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: This also happens with my an0 card, so it's probably a larger ACPI +
PCCARD
: interoperability issue.
Its a ACPI issue. We do the right things in the drivers and bridge
drivers. Do
ACPI stiil fails miserably on my Thinkpad T23 with these patches.
I've attached the ASL and DSDT data in tar.gz format.
Output from boot -v (transcribed by hand, so forgive any obvious typos)
Note -- the 'o' character in 'So' below is really o with an umlat. I
suspect the space in 'T ' is a
As Nate kindly pointed out, my laptop needed a BIOS upgrade. With the
upgrade, I can boot fine with ACPI enabled, although some
sleep/suspend/resume stuff doesn't work right. Nate's already reported
that.
Thanks,
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Garret
t Rooney writes:
The following program builds and runs under 4.7-STABLE:
#include iostream
int main()
{
coutHello World\n;
}
... but under 5.0-CURRENT it gives me the following errors:
cwtest$ g++ -o foo foo.cc
I'm trying to debug a kernel problem with the RC1 install CD (I get a
hang) - basically playing with various kernel options and putting debug
printfs.
pxeboot sounded like just the thing I needed - burning CDs or floppies
being too cumbersome for me. I've followed the recipe and get to the
Remove the # (stringify) operator from the printf()
arguments in
the iprintf macro. It was causing the actual format string and
variable names to be written out, instead of substituting the
values of the variables into the format string.
I take it that gcc's preprocessor getting
I cvsup'd from 5.0-R to HEAD and enabled ACPI to see if anything had changed
in the past 6 months.
Indeed, things have, and a few workarounds I had implemented before were no
longer needed.
However, I still got a host of errors from ACPI upon boot, and some hacks to
device.hints were still
Matthew Emmerton wrote:
I cvsup'd from 5.0-R to HEAD and enabled ACPI to see if anything had
changed
in the past 6 months.
Indeed, things have, and a few workarounds I had implemented before were
no
longer needed.
However, I still got a host of errors from ACPI upon boot, and some
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23
From: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003
I recently forgot my root password, rebooted single-user and changed it,
and immediately afterwards the computer denied the existence of any
non-root users (home directories still there for those that had them,
they still have login shells, etc.). This was the only change made to
the system.
Folks,
Okay, so now I just figured out what the ath driver is. Sigh...
Of course, I find this out through searching for open source
drivers for the Broadcom chipset as used in the Linksys WPC54G
cardbus device, which I happen to have just bought.
I've already done quite a bit
Hi,
While trying to port the SCTP-KAME code to CURRENT,
I noticed that M_NOTIFICATION is missing from sys/mbuf.h
in CURRENT, but it is present in the KAME version of this
file.
Any reason not to apply this patch?
--- sys/sys/mbuf.h.orig Sat Sep 13 19:34:07 2003
+++ sys/sys/mbuf.h Sat
Your working example below compiles without error using gcc 2.95.x (FreeBSD
4.x) and gcc 3.2.x (FreeBSD 5.x), which is expected since it's compliant
C++. (See Stroustrup's The C++ Programming Language, section 9.2.2, which
indicates that the proper way to include C++ standard library headers such
It compiled on -CURRENT and -STABLE using this:
#include iostream
You've got #include iostream.h in your example below.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Brent Verner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:15 PM
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brent Verner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: gcc-3.2.1 and c++ headers
It compiled on -CURRENT and -STABLE using this:
#include iostream
You've got #include
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:39:33 -0800 (PST), Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What would be really cool is if more config files could
do 'includes' so that you could have a syslogd.local.conf
wher eall your local entries could be. In
- Original Message -
From: Brian J. Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:45 PM
Subject: freebsd 5.0 on hp netserver lf
Folks,
I posted a question earlier on freebsd-questions concerning this, and have
since discovered a bit more. Sorry about
- Original Message -
From: David Leimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 8:29 AM
Subject: Just building the lib part of world
Or even better would be just building libc. I have been working on my
getpwnam_r assignment...
examining
Sorry, you're right. libc is where you want to be putting your code. (I'm
suffering from multiple-OS-itis right now.)
--
Matt
- Original Message -
From: David Leimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 8:46 AM
- Original Message -
From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: Overall feel for the stability of FreeBSD 5
From: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message -
From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 10:30 AM
Subject: Overall feel for the stability of FreeBSD 5
I'm considering setting up a FreeBSD 5 machine as a dedicated
backup/archive computer on a network I administer.
suggestions?
--
Matthew Emmerton || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GSI Computer Services || http://www.gsicomp.on.ca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
aout support is still
* De: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: aout support broken in gcc3 ]
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support
in
5.x. Am I wrong?
We should be *very
In message p0511170fb9c130cfa786@[128.113.24.47], Garance A Drosihn
writes:
I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have
it's own name, even if it's just expat2fb. I have no opinion
on whether that should be the full expat2 or a stripped down
functionality, but I think
At 9:37 AM -0400 10/3/02, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
Garance A Drosihnwrites:
I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have
it's own name, even if it's just expat2fb.
It sounds to me like this sums it up nicely. The thing about it
I like is that it does
Dear all...
First of all, really sorry for cross-posting...
I am running a -CURRENT system (Apr 30th 2001). There is a user in my
machine running this small program to DoS my xl0 interface. I doubt that
this program is specifically designed for xl cards though.
Once the program is
into a GPL
product. Obviously, this will cause problems.
Afaik, the patches can remain part of the ports tree without problems.
--
Matthew Emmerton || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GSI Computer Services || http://www.gsicomp.on.ca
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Patrik Sundberg wrote:
hi,
I found this tool
29 matches
Mail list logo
