Re: Huawei E3272 tester needed

On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:40:45 +0200 Nick Hibma wrote: > Hi, > > Is there someone who is able to test support for the Huawei E3272 > card with CURRENT after 269584? I have not been able to confirm that > it works. > > Thanks in advance. > > Nick > Hi, I did fresh svn update, rebuilt world+kern

Re: Huawei E3272 tester needed

On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:55:50 +0200 Maciej Milewski wrote: > On 16.09.2014 16:52, Milan Obuch wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:40:45 +0200 > > Nick Hibma wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there someone who is able to test support for the Huawei E

Re: Huawei E3272 tester needed

On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:35:19 +0200 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 09/16/14 22:18, Milan Obuch wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:55:50 +0200 > > Maciej Milewski wrote: > > > >> On 16.09.2014 16:52, Milan Obuch wrote: > >>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2

Re: Huawei E3272 tester needed

On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:43:34 +0200 Maciej Milewski wrote: > On 16.09.2014 22:18, Milan Obuch wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:55:50 +0200 > > Maciej Milewski wrote: > > > >> On 16.09.2014 16:52, Milan Obuch wrote: > >>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2

Re: Huawei E3272 tester needed

On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:11:26 +0200 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 09/16/14 22:52, Milan Obuch wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:35:19 +0200 > > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > > >> On 09/16/14 22:18, Milan Obuch wrote: > >>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 2

Re: static routes on VLAN on CURRENT

On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 13:40:01 +0200 "Hartmann, O." wrote: [ snip ] > On igb1.2 (vlan tag 2) I want to run an asterisk PBX (that is the main > goal). The interface is attached with the IP 192.168.2.1. The NIX is > attached to a VLAN capable switch and VLAN 2 is for VoIP telephones. > > To not use

Re: static routes on VLAN on CURRENT

On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 20:13:49 +0200 "Hartmann, O." wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 14:39:34 +0200 > Milan Obuch wrote: [ snip ] > > > To not use a routing daemon due to the small size of my network, I > > > desided to use static routes, in rc.conf I pl

Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?

Hi, I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying what to csup *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvs

Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300 Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov > > wrote: > >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch > >> wrote: > >>> Hi, >

nullfs broken on powerpc

Hi, as I succesfully installed FreeBSD on Mac Mini (older powerpc model with G4 CPU) I tried to use mount_nullfs to share some files for more systems. I use this method for years on i386 and amd64 platforms for years now to share sources and other files. Basically I want to have small system spec

Re: nullfs broken on powerpc

On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:21:23 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 06:31:52PM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote: > > Hi, > > [ snip ] > > This does not work with powerpc for me. With sources csup'ped this > > morning, full system rebuild with GENERIC ke

Re: nullfs broken on powerpc

On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:00:26 +0100 Andreas Tobler wrote: > On 25.01.12 21:29, Eitan Adler wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Milan > > Obuch wrote: > >> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:21:23 +0200 > >> Kostik Belousov wrote: > >> [ snip ] >

Re: Unable to build kernel #263665 "config: illegal option -- I"

On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 17:52:40 +0200 Vladimir Sharun wrote: > Hello FreeBSD comunity, > > Got yesterday following issue with #263665: > > # make kernel > > > -- > >>> Kernel build for COBALT started on Sun Mar 23 17:44:45 EET 2014 > --

WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB broken?

Hi, I encountered an error when WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB option is specified for 'make buildworld' process. I documented this issue with build logs at my page, http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log1 and http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log2 show how to test this. At this time, there is no /etc/make

Re: WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB broken?

On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:18:33 + Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:09:05PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote: > > On 16 June 2011 16:55, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:50:17PM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: > > >> Hi, > > &

Re: RFC: nfsd in a vnet jail

On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 10:29:25 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Alan Somers (from Tue, 29 Nov 2022 > 17:28:10 -0700): > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 5:21 PM Rick Macklem > > wrote: > > >> So, what do others think of enforcing the requirement that each > >> jail have its own file sy

Re: RFC: nfsd in a vnet jail

On Fri, 02 Dec 2022 11:03:01 +0100 Olivier Certner wrote: > Hi, > > > (snip) > > > > #2 - Require separate file systems and run mountd inside the > > jail(s). > > > > I think that allowing both alternatives would be too confusing > > and it seems that most want mountd to run within the jail(s).

Re: orangepi [was: what happened to src/sys/boot?]

On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 14:22:26 -0600 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 08:55:20PM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote: > > ok, the image created now boots on both orangepi-one and nanopi-neo, > > but without ethernet! > > So w/rt orangepi-one testing I think I'm now at parity with your > bui

Bug in /usr/src/sys/sys/sf_buf.h?

Hi, after updating to revision 328171, building 12-CURRENT kernel gives cc -target armv7-gnueabihf-freebsd12.0 --sysroot=/usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/tmp -B/usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/tmp/usr/bin -c -O -pipe -g -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/libfdt -I/usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/inclu

Re: Bug in /usr/src/sys/sys/sf_buf.h?

On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 13:17:38 -0800 Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > This is my fault. Apologies. I will fix it immediately. > -Nathan > Revision 328179, fix confirmed. Thanks. Milan > On 01/19/18 13:16, Milan Obuch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after updating to revision 3281

Re: Problem compiling git from ports

On Fri, 1 Jan 2021 16:11:52 + (UTC), Filippo Moretti wrote: > > I run again portmaster and I have the same error as previously > reportedFilippo On Friday, January 1, 2021, 4:05:18 PM GMT+1, Filippo > Moretti wrote: > Ufs > It exits with a different error: > ===> Installing contributed

Re: usb_load="YES"

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 06:17:16 +0100 Graham Perrin wrote: > usb(4) > > > > As an example: in what type of situation might it be desirable, or > necessary, to load the driver as a module at boot time? > From my e

Re: usb_load="YES"

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 07:38:56 +0200 Milan Obuch wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 06:17:16 +0100 > Graham Perrin wrote: > > > usb(4) > > > > <https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=usb&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD#SYNOPSIS> > > > > As an example