Out of swap handling

1999-07-17 Thread Peter Holm
g but only this one seems to guaranty recovery. I have included my changes. Regards, -- Peter Holm | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://login.dknet.dk/~pho/ -[ Member of the BSD-Dk User Group / http://www.bsd-dk.dk/ ] - *** sys/vm/vm_pageout.c~Sun Jul 4 13:53:49 1999 --- sys/vm/vm_pag

panic: softdep_flushfiles: looping

1999-07-29 Thread Peter Holm
Kirk seems to be out of touch :-), so I created PR kern/12869. -- Peter Holm | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://login.dknet.dk/~pho/ -[ Member of the BSD-Dk User Group / http://www.bsd-dk.dk/ ] - To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i

Re: Disk/FS I/O issues in -CURRENT

2003-06-30 Thread Peter Holm
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 01:42:15PM +0200, Eirik Oeverby wrote: Hi folks, I am having some very weird problems on my laptop, I can repeat the problem (noticed with savecore) on a kernel from Jun 30 05:23 UTC: current# df -h . FilesystemSize Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1f

LOR in vm/swap_pager.c:1166 + vm/vm_kern.c:325

2003-07-07 Thread Peter Holm
() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1d --- syscall (7), eip = 0x807b26b, esp = 0xbfbffa0c, ebp = 0xbfbffa28 --- -- Peter Holm ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Deadlock

2003-07-09 Thread Peter Holm
Here's a trace from a deadlock in a kernel from Jul 8 13:51 UTC: http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/cons36.html -- Peter Holm ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail

Deadlock [PATCH]

2003-08-14 Thread Peter Holm
. -- Peter Holm --- sched_4bsd.c~ Sun Jun 15 16:57:17 2003 +++ sched_4bsd.cSun Aug 10 08:41:06 2003 @@ -448,7 +448,8 @@ ke-ke_sched-ske_cpticks++; kg-kg_estcpu = ESTCPULIM(kg-kg_estcpu + 1); - if ((kg-kg_estcpu % INVERSE_ESTCPU_WEIGHT) == 0) { + if (((kg-kg_estcpu

Re: panic: double fault with 11.0-CURRENT r258504

2013-11-28 Thread Peter Holm
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:56:10AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:11:35PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013

Re: panic: double fault with 11.0-CURRENT r258504

2013-11-30 Thread Peter Holm
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:56:10AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:11:35PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013

Re: nanobsd / dd problem?

2013-12-09 Thread Peter Holm
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 06:42:39AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 06:31:36PM +0100, Stefan Hegnauer wrote: Hi, I am using freebsd-current (FreeBSD BUILDMASTER 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r259095: Sun Dec 8 10:20:40 CET 2013

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-24 Thread Peter Holm
under review. - I believe Peter Holm has more test cases that fails with tmpfs. He would have more details. I somewhat remember some panic on execve(2) the binary located on tmpfs. I ran the TMPFS tests I have and so far I only spotted the mmap(2) problem: http://people.freebsd.org/~pho

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-24 Thread Peter Holm
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:06:27PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:30:16PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:31:09AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: Does anyone object to this patch

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-24 Thread Peter Holm
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 05:50:43PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 03:21:05PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:06:27PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:30:16PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21:53PM

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-25 Thread Peter Holm
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:57:16PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 06:20:03PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: Got a panic: Not a vnode object quite fast: http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/kostik441.txt Ah, yes, this is an assertion that was added in the r209702

Re: panic: vputx: missed vn_close

2013-01-10 Thread Peter Holm
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:40:07AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:52:43PM +0100, Florian Smeets wrote: Hi, I got this while building packages with poudriere. I'm running r245188. Let me know if you need anything else from the dump. Florian

Re: panic, seems related to r234386

2012-05-08 Thread Peter Holm
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:11:53PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: I got this with today's current, previous (working) kernel is

Re: panic, seems related to r234386

2012-05-10 Thread Peter Holm
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:21:18PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:45:14PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:11:53PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov

Re: panic, seems related to r234386

2012-05-13 Thread Peter Holm
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:49:38AM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:39:00PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:21:18PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:45:14PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:11:53PM +0200

Re: NewNFS vs. oldNFS for 10.0?

2013-03-18 Thread Peter Holm
, since both the old and new client use the same rpc.lockd in the same way (the new one just cribbed the code from the old one), I think the same problem would exist for the old one. As such, I don't believe this is a regression. Maybe we can talk Peter Holm into periodically running his file

Re: r269147: NULL mp in getnewvnode() via kern_proc_filedesc_out()

2014-08-07 Thread Peter Holm
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 09:15:12PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 12:48:28PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 8/5/2014 10:56 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 8/5/2014 10:19 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 09:47:57PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:

Re: How a full fsck screwed up my SU+J filesystem

2010-12-01 Thread Peter Holm
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:28:06AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: So... I was doing a portmaster -af today because vlc stopped playing audio (for some reason ... I kind of went on a pkg_cutleaves rampage and probably deinstalled too much stuff), and the machine hardlocked during an

Re: SU+J: negative used diskspace (for a while)

2011-06-17 Thread Peter Holm
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 05:34:15PM +0200, Hans Ottevanger wrote: Hi, I found a possible issue with SU+J on recent versions of -CURRENT. After deleting a large file hierarchy (copy of /usr/src, ~1.5 Gbyte), df reports a negative number of blocks Used for a while. Yes, thank you. This is

Re: SUJ panic on new directory rename

2010-07-04 Thread Peter Holm
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 09:42:08PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote: Is this core updates somewhere? (With, possibly, a copy of your kernel binaries?) Attilio Some more info here: http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/attilio039.txt - Peter ___

Re: softupdate with journal panic

2010-08-22 Thread Peter Holm
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:49:45PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: While updating sysutils/coreutils port on -current as of this morning (SVN r211550), I noted a panic during the directory rename config test. Your problem seems identical to this report:

Re: softupdate with journal panic

2010-08-23 Thread Peter Holm
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:12:57AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 03:21:04PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:49:45PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: While updating sysutils/coreutils port on -current as of this morning (SVN r211550), I noted a panic

Re: Corruption of UFS filesystems after using md(4)

2010-11-03 Thread Peter Holm
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 07:33:50PM +, Bruce Cran wrote: On Tuesday 02 November 2010 19:12:14 Bruce Cran wrote: I've noticed in recent months that I appear to be getting silent corruption of my UFS filesystems - and I think it may be linked to using md(4) or creating sparse files.

Re: Possible bug in or around posix_fadvise after r292326

2016-01-05 Thread Peter Holm
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:07:40PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:05:21PM -0800, Benno Rice wrote: > > Hi Konstantin, > > > > I recently updated my dev box to r292962. After doing this I attempted to > > set up PostgreSQL 9.4. When I ran initdb the last phase

Re: isofs kernel panic

2015-12-27 Thread Peter Holm
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 12:09:27PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 03:38:48AM -0500, Shawn Webb wrote: > > Hey All, > > > > This is from booting a new installer ISO, generated today from a very > > recent commit: > > > > === Begin Log === > > Trying to mount root from

Re: Kqueue races causing crashes

2016-06-15 Thread Peter Holm
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:11:43AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:26:14PM -0500, Eric Badger wrote: > > I believe they all have more or less the same cause. The crashes occur > > because we acquire a knlist lock via the KN_LIST_LOCK macro, but when we > > call

Re: Kqueue races causing crashes

2016-06-15 Thread Peter Holm
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:11:43AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:26:14PM -0500, Eric Badger wrote: > > I believe they all have more or less the same cause. The crashes occur > > because we acquire a knlist lock via the KN_LIST_LOCK macro, but when we > > call

panic: bogus refcnt 0 on lle 0xfffff80121a13a00

2016-07-12 Thread Peter Holm
Exiting from single-user mode triggers this: ifa_maintain_loopback_route: deletion failed for interface igb0: 3 panic: bogus refcnt 0 on lle 0xf80121a13a00 cpuid = 9 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfe1048c63470 vpanic() at

Re: panic: bogus refcnt 0 on lle 0xfffff80121a13a00

2016-07-12 Thread Peter Holm
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:55:31AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 07/12/16 10:37, Peter Holm wrote: > > Exiting from single-user mode triggers this: > > > > ifa_maintain_loopback_route: deletion failed for interface igb0: 3 > > panic: bogus refcnt 0 on lle 0xfff

panic: softclock_call_cc: act 0xfffff80c036eec00 0

2016-07-19 Thread Peter Holm
Got this while testing a patch: panic: softclock_call_cc: act 0xf80c036eec00 0 cpuid = 22 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfe0f940c97d0 vpanic() at vpanic+0x182/frame 0xfe0f940c9850 kassert_panic() at kassert_panic+0x126/frame

Page fault in udp_usrreq.c:823

2018-06-20 Thread Peter Holm
20180620 10:32:47 all (1/1): udp.sh Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepable locks held: shared rw udpinp (udpinp) r = 0 (0xf80bbc808d78) locked @ netinet/in_pcb.c:2398 stack backtrace: #0 0x80c00733 at witness_debugger+0x73 #1 0x80c01b11 at witness_warn+0x461 #2

Re: Page fault in udp_usrreq.c:823

2018-06-21 Thread Peter Holm
of the few. > > > > > > In message > il.com> > > , Matthew Macy writes: > >> Try updating. It should be fixed. > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Cy Schubert > >> wrot > >> e: > >> > In message &

Re: g_handleattr: md0 bio_length 24 len 31 -> EFAULT

2018-04-08 Thread Peter Holm
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:36:08AM -0700, Michael Dexter wrote: > On 3/24/18 2:35 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Writing out memory (md) backed images of UFS2 filesystems (NanoBSD images, > > created via > > the classical manual way, no makefs), my recent CURRENT system dumps the > > console full of

Re: Page fault in midi/sequencer.c

2018-10-22 Thread Peter Holm
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:00:41AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 10/20/18 6:56 PM, Peter Holm wrote: > > I can trigger this on 13.0-CURRENT r339445 with a non-root test program: > > > > Hi, > > The following commits should fix the issues you experience: >

panic: mtx_lock() by idle thread ... mutex igb0 @ ../../../net/iflib.c:2084

2018-10-23 Thread Peter Holm
Feeding entropy: . lo0: link state changed to UP panic: mtx_lock() by idle thread 0xf800036ac000 on sleep mutex igb0 @ ../../../net/iflib.c:2084 cpuid = 4 time = 1540286062 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfe007876e610 vpanic() at

Page fault in midi/sequencer.c

2018-10-20 Thread Peter Holm
I can trigger this on 13.0-CURRENT r339445 with a non-root test program: Calling uiomove() with the following non-sleepable locks held: exclusive sleep mutex seqflq (seqflq) r = 0 (0xf80003860c08) locked @ dev/sound/midi/sequencer.c:952 stack backtrace: #0 0x80bfe263 at

Re: r340343 triggers kernel assertion if file is opened with O_BENEATH flag set through symlink

2018-11-28 Thread Peter Holm
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 01:46:17AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:54:21AM +0300, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: > > Following test case triggers assertion after r340343: > > > > > > #include > > > > int > > main(int argc, char **argv) > > { > >