...@freebsd.org
--
Randall Stewart
803-317-4952 (cell)
803-345-0391(direct)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current
of the things I am planning at my
day job I really need to have T-S processes be separate from the real
time unless
you know of some pitfall there??
If you have no objections I will commit this..
Thanks
R
--
Randall Stewart
803-317-4952 (cell)
803-345-0391(direct
))
--
Randall Stewart
803-317-4952 (cell)
803-345-0391(direct)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
tlen = m-m_pkthdr.len;
if (opt (opt-ip6po_flags IP6PO_DONTFRAG))
On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Randall Stewart wrote:
Nigel:
Here is a patch for your issue I think.
Its off of a head machine but I think it should apply. If not
let me know.
See if this does not fix the issue
--
Randall Stewart
803-317-4952 (cell)
803-345-0391(direct)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr
--
Randall Stewart
803-317-4952 (cell)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
... If I don't hear from anyone I will start backing
things out 1
rev at a time until I find what did it I guess ;-)
R
--
Randall Stewart
803-317-4952 (cell)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Hi Lawrence:
I am currently doing a binary search..
I know that 212660 shows the break.
I am just about to try 212560 ;-)
If that works I will update to 212646 and see if it works.. ;-)
R
On Sep 19, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hiya Randall!
On 09/20/10 08:56, Randall Stewart
Andrly:
Ok..
I can do that.
I can positively say that when I have a kernel with 212646.. all is
well.
But a kernel with 212647 crashes as described below...
I will ship you the read-elf offlist
R
On Sep 19, 2010, at 9:40 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 20/09/2010 06:38 Randall Stewart
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
--
Randall Stewart
803-317-4952 (cell
--
Randall Stewart
803-317-4952 (cell)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
t;h...@selasky.org> wrote:
>>>> .
----
Randall Stewart
r...@netflix.com
803-317-4952
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "f
:
>>
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/290805
>>
>> Can you try the attached patch?
>>
>> Randall: Can you fix this ASAP?
>>
>> --HPS
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Randall:
>
> I see for 11-current, callout_reset() doesn't return -1 when the callout is
> stopped like with callout_stop(). Is this a bug or a feature? Why can't the
> callout_reset() and callout_stop() functions use the same return values?
>
> In nd6_llinfo_settimer_locked() the return value of both callout_reset() and
> callout_stop() is checked for positive values, but not in the other places
> mentioned by my patch.
>
> --HPS
Randall Stewart
r...@netflix.com
803-317-4952
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Selasky <h...@selasky.org> wrote:
> On 12/10/15 16:25, Randall Stewart wrote:
>> For callout_stop/drain you get
>>
>> -1 == Callout as already gone off or is not running (usually the latter)
>> else the caller iks
>> not using locking properly or did no
_stop() should return 0 when the callout is currently being
>> J> serviced and indeed unstoppable
>> J>
>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/differential/changeset/?ref=62513=ignore-most
>> J>
>> J> But this change impacted too many old code paths and was interestin
>>> J> We did propose a patch to make _callout_stop_safe() returns 0 (fail)
>>> J> when the callout is currently running:
>>> J>
>>> J> callout_stop() should return 0 when the callout is currently being
>>> J> serviced and indeed
> #25 ithread_execute_handlers (p=, ie=)
>at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1161
> #26 ithread_loop (arg=) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1241
> #27 0x80481544 in fork_exit (
>callout=0x80484810 , arg=0xf81058226460,
>
17 matches
Mail list logo