[Patch] mdmfs currently broken

2003-09-04 Thread Stefan Eßer
Seems that mdmfs stopped working recently (probably because of GEOM related changes). One possible fix is to label the md and newfs the thusly created c partition. This requires running /sbin/disklabel, which didn't have an entry in paths.h. Any objections against me committing the follwoing

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-06-09 Thread Stefan Eßer
On 2003-06-09 19:52 +, Tinderbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I.

Re: 5.1-CURRENT hangs on disk i/o? sysctl_old_user() non-sleepablelocks

2003-06-19 Thread Stefan Eßer
On 2003-06-18 20:41 -0700, Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18 Jun, Chris Shenton wrote: Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Try the very untested patch below ... RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c,v retrieving revision 1.150 Try the very untested patch below

Re: 5.1-CURRENT hangs on disk i/o? sysctl_old_user() non-sleepablelocks

2003-06-20 Thread Stefan Eßer
On 2003-06-19 08:13 -0700, Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In PR kern/46652 I reported, that DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS does never check the **vpp parameters. A patch is included in the PR and it does generate the missing tests. I asked for feedback on the hackers mail list (IIRC), but did

Re: Trouble with ACPI and ASUS MB

2003-07-15 Thread Stefan Eßer
On 2003-07-14 20:33 -0400, Scott Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed 5.1 RELEASE on a box with an ASUS A7A266 motherboard. Not having done enough reading, I had put device apm in the kernel and added apmd_enable=YES to /etc/rc.conf. The box wouldn't turn off in response to

Re: USB lpt and NOPRIME

2003-11-26 Thread Stefan Eßer
On 2003-11-26 08:54 -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have had the problem listed in the article below for years (4.x and 5.x). I have been unable to use my Lexmark Optra 312 (USB) with FreeBSD (w/cups) because there is so often a page of trash printed before a print job

Panic in gptzfsboot?

2020-02-05 Thread Stefan Eßer
I have just re-built world and kernel and get a boot failure: panic: free: guard2 fail @ 0x412f6c50 + 513 from unknown:0 --> Press a key in the console to reboot <-- I'll try to boot from a memory stick, now, but wanted to let others know, that there seems to be a problem with the latest UMA

Re: Panic in gptzfsboot?

2020-02-05 Thread Stefan Eßer
Am 05.02.20 um 10:14 schrieb Toomas Soome: >> On 5. Feb 2020, at 11:12, Stefan Eßer > <mailto:s...@freebsd.org>> wrote: >> >> I have just re-built world and kernel and get a boot failure: >> >> panic: free: guard2 fail @ 0x412f6c50 + 513 from unknown:0 &

Re: Panic in gptzfsboot?

2020-02-05 Thread Stefan Eßer
Am 05.02.20 um 12:02 schrieb Toomas Soome: > Fixed, sorry about the mess:) Hi Toomas, thank you very much for the quick fix! My system is healthy again ;-) Best regards, STefan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: option KDTRACE_HOOKS non-optional after r357912?

2020-02-15 Thread Stefan Eßer
Am 15.02.20 um 15:40 schrieb Stefan Eßer: > Am 15.02.20 um 14:47 schrieb Mateusz Guzik: >> On 2/15/20, Stefan Eßer wrote: >>> Hi Mateusz, >>> >>> your optimization of systrace checks has made KDTRACE_HOOKS mandatory, >>> since there are unpro

Re: option KDTRACE_HOOKS non-optional after r357912?

2020-02-15 Thread Stefan Eßer
Am 15.02.20 um 14:47 schrieb Mateusz Guzik: > On 2/15/20, Stefan Eßer wrote: >> Hi Mateusz, >> >> your optimization of systrace checks has made KDTRACE_HOOKS mandatory, >> since there are unprotected assignments to systrace_enabled (which is >> defined

Re: option KDTRACE_HOOKS non-optional after r357912?

2020-02-15 Thread Stefan Eßer
Am 15.02.20 um 18:45 schrieb Konstantin Belousov: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 03:58:06PM +0100, Stefan Eßer wrote: >> Am 15.02.20 um 15:40 schrieb Stefan Eßer: >>> Am 15.02.20 um 14:47 schrieb Mateusz Guzik: >>>> On 2/15/20, Stefan Eßer wrote: >>>>&

Re: CURRENT: bc -e results in empty string/result

2020-07-03 Thread Stefan Eßer
Am 03.07.20 um 17:24 schrieb O. Hartmann: > Hello list, > > running some scripts caluclating via bc() the expression shown below: > > bc -e '6582031 - 1048576 - 0 - 409600 - 1024 - 40 - 4096' -e quit The bc in -CURRENT has been replaced by a new implementation. It seems there is one deviation

Re: CURRENT: bc -e results in empty string/result

2020-07-07 Thread Stefan Eßer
Am 05.07.20 um 11:25 schrieb Stefan Eßer: > Am 04.07.20 um 11:50 schrieb Hartmann, O.: > The author of the new bc has changed the semantics of -e to those > of the FreeBSD version, since he is very interested in providing > an implementation that covers all relevant GNU and Free

Re: CURRENT: bc -e results in empty string/result

2020-07-05 Thread Stefan Eßer
Am 04.07.20 um 11:50 schrieb Hartmann, O.: > On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:58:27 +0200 > Stefan Eßer wrote: >> From the bc man-page: >> >> The quit statement causes bc(1) to quit, even if it is on a branch >> that will not be executed (it is a compile-time command). >>