Hi,
I said:
I am guessing that little of the above will be MFC'd into 4.0. So the issue
of the current SMP patch set should be based on its merits alone. I would
agree that they in themselves are worthy of MFCing. Lets just not kid
Mike Smith replied:
Steve Passe actually argued quite
mask = cam - SMP: XXX
^^^
from:
trap.c: printf( - SMP: XXX);
I have no memory as to whether the associated comment is valid!
--
Steve Passe | powered by
s...@csn.net|Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD
To Unsubscribe: send mail
$$ucks for hardware setup till I get a handle on
APM and friends.
Now I just need some free time to help with the card-bus stuff!
--
Steve Passe | powered by
s...@csn.net|Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe
