SMP in 5.1 cant deactivate hyperthreading

2003-06-10 Thread Steven Hartland
sysctl machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 1 Relevant sections from dmesg: Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 - irq 0 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #1 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #2 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0,

Re: SMP in 5.1 cant deactivate hyperthreading

2003-06-12 Thread Steven Hartland
Original Message - From: John-Mark Gurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes 5.X is still new tech and may not run on all machines but on the ones which it does ( and it runs very well here ) basic tools are required. If it doesn't run on a machine your under know false impressions, if however

Re: ZFS Crashes

2013-08-11 Thread Steven Hartland
You seem to be getting a selection of random looking issues bad hardware would be my first guess. Run a memtest and see if it turns up anything. Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013

Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-08 Thread Steven Hartland
I believe this was added by this change set:- http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821 Might want to try back out that change and see if everything works after that? Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org To:

Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-08 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: I believe this was added by this change set:- http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821 Might want to try back out that change and see

Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-08 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:02:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: I believe this was added by this change set:- http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-09-13 Thread Steven Hartland
This is a recent bit of code by Justin cc'ed, so he's likely the best person to investigate this one. Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Dmitryy Makarov suppor...@ukr.net To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 12:16 PM Subject: ZFS secondarycache

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-09-16 Thread Steven Hartland
to a default value. I couldn't reproduce the issue for log here, it just seems to work for me, can you confirm what ashift is reported for your devices using: zdb pool Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Borja Marcos bor...@sarenet.es To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc

Re: Re[3]: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-09-16 Thread Steven Hartland
have to did some more to see how ashift in cache devices is or isn't implemented. Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Dmitriy Makarov suppor...@ukr.net To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: Borja Marcos bor...@sarenet.es; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Justin T

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-09-17 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Justin T. Gibbs gi...@freebsd.org Sorry for being slow to chime in on this thread. I live in Boulder, CO and we've had a bit of rain. :-) Hope all is well your side, everyone safe and sound if may be little wetter than usual. As Steven pointed out,

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-10-16 Thread Steven Hartland
: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net To: Dmitriy Makarov suppor...@ukr.net Cc: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk; Justin T. Gibbs gi...@freebsd.org; Borja Marcos bor...@sarenet.es; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:01 AM Subject: Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-10-16 Thread Steven Hartland
vfs.zfs.max_auto_ashift=9 Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net; Dmitriy Makarov suppor...@ukr.net; Justin T. Gibbs gi...@freebsd.org; Borja Marcos bor...@sarenet.es; freebsd

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-10-16 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Justin T. Gibbs gi...@freebsd.org I took a quick look at arc.c and see that the trim_map_free() calls don't take into account ashift. I don't know if that has anything to do with your problem though. I would expect this would just make the trim less

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-10-16 Thread Steven Hartland
Ohh stupid question what hardware are you running this on, specifically what SSD's and what controller and if relavent what controller Firmware version? I wonder if you might have bad HW / FW, such as older LSI mps Firmware, which is know to causing corruption with some delete methods. Without

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-10-17 Thread Steven Hartland
Still worth testing with the problem version installed but with trim disabled to see if that clears the issues, if nothing else it will confirm / deny if trim is involved. Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net To: Steven Hartland kill

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-10-17 Thread Steven Hartland
in default system configuration is disabled trim functional ? Steven Hartland wrote: SH Still worth testing with the problem version installed but SH with trim disabled to see if that clears the issues, if SH nothing else it will confirm / deny if trim is involved

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-10-18 Thread Steven Hartland
- free - (3.5K) Any hypothesis what alse we can test/try etc? Steven Hartland wrote: SH Correct. SH - Original Message - SH From: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net SH SH SH Just to be sure I understand you clearly, I need to test next configuration: SH SH 1) System

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-10-18 Thread Steven Hartland
that there's nothing to write */ Could you try this patch on your system Vitalij see if it has any effect on the number of l2_cksum_bad / l2_io_error? Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: Vitalij

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-10-21 Thread Steven Hartland
Hows things looking Vitalij? - Original Message - From: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net Ok. Just right now system rebooted with you patch. Trim enabled again. WIll wait some time untile size of used cache grow's. Steven Hartland wrote: SH Looking at the l2arc compression code

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2013-10-21 Thread Steven Hartland
So previously you only started seeing l2 errors after there was a significant amount of data in l2arc? Thats interesting in itself if thats the case. I wonder if its the type of data, or something similar. Do you run compression on any of your volumes? zfs get compression Regards Steve

Re: ZFS L2ARC - incorrect size and abnormal system load on r255173

2013-10-22 Thread Steven Hartland
First off I just wanted to clarify that you don't need to compression on dataset for L2ARC to use LZ4 compression, it does this by default as is not currently configurable. Next up I believe we've found the cause of this high load and I've just committed the fix to head:

Re: ZFS L2ARC - incorrect size and abnormal system load on r255173

2013-10-22 Thread Steven Hartland
Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net; Allan Jude free...@allanjude.com; Dmitriy Makarov suppor...@ukr.net; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 3:10 PM Subject: Re: ZFS L2ARC - incorrect size

Re: ZFS L2ARC - incorrect size and abnormal system load on r255173

2013-10-25 Thread Steven Hartland
I would have expected zero for all l2_compress values. Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net; Dmitriy Makarov suppor...@ukr.net; freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Re: ZFS buggy in CURRENT? Stuck in [zio-io_cv] forever!

2013-10-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de I have setup a RAIDZ pool comprised from 4 3TB HDDs. To maintain 4k block alignment, I followed the instructions given on several sites and I'll sketch them here for the protocol. The operating system is 11.0-CURRENT

Re: ZFS L2ARC - incorrect size and abnormal system load on r255173

2013-10-28 Thread Steven Hartland
patch not disabling compresion on l2arc? Steven Hartland wrote: SH I would have expected zero for all l2_compress values. SH SH Regards SH Steve SH SH - Original Message - SH From: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net SH To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk SH Cc: Vitalij

Re: Overriding sector size on disks?

2013-11-01 Thread Steven Hartland
What does camcontrol identity say? - Original Message - From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org To: freebsd-current freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 2:45 AM Subject: Overriding sector size on disks? Hi! I have an odd problem. That, honestly, can't be that

Re: SVN commit 259045 breaks -CURRENT

2013-12-15 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Stefan Esser s...@freebsd.org To: Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com; Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 1:25 PM Subject: Re: SVN commit 259045 breaks -CURRENT Am 15.12.2013

Re: ZFS command can block the whole ZFS subsystem!

2014-01-03 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de For some security reasons, I dumped via dd a large file onto a 3TB disk. The systems is 11.0-CURRENT #1 r259667: Fri Dec 20 22:43:56 CET 2013 amd64. Filesystem in question is a single ZFS pool. Issuing the command rm

Re: ZFS command can block the whole ZFS subsystem!

2014-01-03 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:38:03 - Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: - Original Message - From: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de For some security reasons, I dumped via dd a large

Re: [rfc] replacing /boot/kernel.old with a unique directory name

2011-08-13 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org i just had the following idea: how about instead of copying the current kernel to /boot/kernel.old and then installing the new one under /boot/kernel as the results of target installkernel, we create a unique directory name

Re: Panics after AHCI timeouts

2011-10-18 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Alexey Shuvaev shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:13 PM Subject: Re: Panics after AHCI timeouts On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:19:19AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 18 October 2011 03:00, Alexey

mountd starts to early when exporting fs marked as late (patch included)

2012-06-24 Thread Steven Hartland
We added some new mount points recently and on reboot they failed to come up after investigating we found that mountd runs too early in the boot process to be able export filesystems that are marked as late in /etc/fstab. Our fix was simply to mark mountd as requiring mountlate and all was well.

Re: mfi driver performance

2012-09-10 Thread Steven Hartland
How are you intending to use the controller? If you're looking to put a load of disk in for say ZFS have you tried flashing to a none RAID firmware so it uses mps instead of mfi? Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Achim Patzner a...@bnc.net To:

Re: mfi driver performance

2012-09-10 Thread Steven Hartland
Might be worth testing anyway, as that would help prove controller or driver issue. - Original Message - From: Achim Patzner a...@bnc.net To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 2:19 PM Subject: Re: mfi driver

Re: ZFS TRIM support committed to HEAD.

2012-09-24 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Charles Sprickman sp...@bway.net Are you aware of anyone that will be trying this in production, and if so, will you be able to give us list denizens any feedback on it? Yes we've been using it in production for a few months now, but only on single disk

Re: ZFS TRIM support committed to HEAD.

2012-09-24 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Charles Sprickman sp...@bway.net I have a patch against stable/8, but not stable/9: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfstrim8.patch Are you aware of anyone that will be trying this in production, and if so, will you be able to give us list denizens

Re: ZFS TRIM support committed to HEAD.

2012-09-24 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Ollivier Robert robe...@keltia.freenix.fr According to Steven Hartland: We applied the patch to a 8.3-RELEASE based install with additional patches including patches to provide TRIM support for CAM da devices via SATA pass-through including full support

Re: ZFS TRIM support committed to HEAD.

2012-09-24 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Bob Bishop r...@gid.co.uk To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; freebsd...@freebsd.org; Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 3:17 PM Subject: Re: ZFS TRIM support committed to HEAD. Hi

Re: ZFS TRIM support committed to HEAD.

2012-09-24 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org Although I'm surprised your seeing that many reported failures as it should have disabled it on a pool level after the first few failures. Is it still increasing? Note that 'failed' count is increasing, not the

Re: ZFS TRIM support committed to HEAD.

2012-09-24 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Ryan Stone Ahh yes looks like ATA supports BIO_DELETE via ATA_CFA_ERASE if the drive announces ATA_PROTO_CFA, so I can only assume this is failing when it shouldn't. Might be nice to investigate what's happening and fix, but as ATA is being replaced by CAM

Re: Bull Mountain (IvyBridge +) random number generator

2012-10-12 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de ... I guess using RDRAND in an hypervisor environment should make no difference but please correct me if I'm wrong. Try compiling your kernel with:- no options PADLOCK_RNG no options IVY_RNG Or commenting the

Re: ZFS RaidZ-2 problems

2012-11-05 Thread Steven Hartland
Yes RAIDZ2 should enable a 2 drive failure without the array faulting so something strange is going on there somewhere. Silly question, what size drives and what driver are you using? Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Paul Wootton paul-free...@fletchermoorland.co.uk To:

Re: Q) KLDload error

2012-11-16 Thread Steven Hartland
sounds like your kernel and world may be out of sync? - Original Message - From: ken k...@tydfam.jp To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:58 PM Subject: Q) KLDload error I have the following error at booting with current kernel. Were there any

Re: Samsung 830 and ZFS TRIM

2012-11-29 Thread Steven Hartland
Do you have any other disks in the machine if so its likely these are the source of the unsupported increments. Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Johannes Dieterich dieterich@gmail.com To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 7:48 PM Subject:

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server

2011-12-15 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Michael Larabel michael.lara...@phoronix.com I was the on that carried out the testing and know that it was on the same system. All of the testing, including the system tables, is fully automated. Under FreeBSD sometimes the parsing of some component

Re: LSI supported mps(4) driver available

2012-01-20 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org To: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:44 PM Subject: LSI supported mps(4) driver available The LSI-supported version of the mps(4) driver that supports their 6Gb SAS HBAs

Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD

2012-05-23 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org Or should we call FFS officially dead and promote ZFS as only usable FS on modern FreeBSD now? Slightly OT but I must say I'm a big fan of ZFS since I first tried it under FreeBSD a few years back. Not only is it a dream to

Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD

2012-05-23 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: While it might be a shame to see FFS go by the wayside are there any big reasons why you would rather stick with FFS instead of moving to ZFS with all

Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD

2012-05-24 Thread Steven Hartland
On 24/05/2012 00:05, Mark Linimon wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: While it might be a shame to see FFS go by the wayside are there any big reasons why you would rather stick with FFS instead of moving to ZFS with all the benefits that brings? - ZFS

Re: ctfconvert again

2013-01-14 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 11:57 PM Subject: ctfconvert again So I updated my FreeBSD machine to 9.1-RELEASE in the hope of getting past the ctfconvert problem that causes a build

Re: ctfconvert again

2013-01-14 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com The following built without any issues, including GENERIC and a custom kernel. I was pleasantly surprised that it was so easy to update from 9.0-RELEASE to 10.0-CURRENT. I was expecting a lot more manual fiddling and

Re: ZFS Trim on mps?

2013-01-20 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: matt sendtom...@gmail.com To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:39 AM Subject: ZFS Trim on mps? Should I be getting trim with ZFS on an mps device? Disks are SATA ssd (830s), only unsupported is being reported. Do I need to set

Re: AHCI timeout when using ZFS + AIO + NCQ

2013-01-24 Thread Steven Hartland
Is it always the same disk, of so replace it SMART helps identify issues but doesn't tell you 100% there's no problem. - Original Message - From: Vladislav Prodan univers...@ukr.net To: f...@freebsd.org Cc: curr...@freebsd.org Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:19 PM Subject: AHCI

Re: Zpool surgery

2013-01-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org I have a slight problem with transplanting a zpool, maybe this is not possible the way I like to do it, maybe I need to fuzz some identifiers... I want to transplant my old zpool tank from a 1TB drive to a new 2TB drive, but

Re: Re[2]: AHCI timeout when using ZFS + AIO + NCQ

2013-01-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Vladislav Prodan univers...@ukr.net Is it always the same disk, of so replace it SMART helps identify issues but doesn't tell you 100% there's no problem. Now it has fallen off a different HDD - ada0. I'm 99% sure that MHDD will not find problems in HDD

Re: AHCI timeout when using ZFS + AIO + NCQ

2013-01-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Vladislav Prodan univers...@ukr.net To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: curr...@freebsd.org; f...@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 3:13 PM Subject: Re[2]: Re[2]: AHCI timeout when using ZFS + AIO + NCQ - Original Message

Re: ZFS problems

2013-02-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Derrick Dantavious Edwards I updated sources a couple of days ago and when I rebooted to continue to the upgrade process I received errors when I attempted to mount zfs filesystem. The error looked like this. zpool mount -a internal error: Invalid

Re: access to hard drives is blocked by writes to a flash drive

2013-03-03 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org To: Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: deeptech71 deeptec...@gmail.com; freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 1:54 PM Subject: Re: access to hard drives is blocked by

Re: FreeBSD is very slow when Memory chip sizes are imbalanced in slots

2013-03-18 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:26 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD is very slow when Memory chip sizes are imbalanced in slots On 03/18/13 07:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Mon, Mar 18,

Re: FreeBSD is very slow when Memory chip sizes are imbalanced in slots

2013-03-18 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Surely you can eliminate all of those and confirm / deny the original diagnosis by simply installing balanced memory in the machine and checking to see if the problem goes away? Please see links in my previous mails . All of these are

Re: FreeBSD is very slow when Memory chip sizes are imbalanced in slots

2013-03-18 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Surely you can eliminate all of those and confirm / deny the original diagnosis by simply installing balanced memory in the machine and checking to see if the problem goes away? Please see links in my previous mails . All of these

Re: FreeBSD is very slow when Memory chip sizes are imbalanced in slots

2013-03-18 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com You state there that The main boards are the same which indicates to me the machines aren't the same machine which could result in some other subtle difference causing the problem. To confirm you'll need to use

Booting an alternative kernel from loader prompt fails the first time only

2013-04-20 Thread Steven Hartland
When trying to boot an alternative kernel from the loader prompt it fails the first time the command is run but succeeds the second time. Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help. OK boot kernel.generic Booting... don't know how to load module '/boot/kernel.generic/kernel'

Re: Booting an alternative kernel from loader prompt fails the first time only

2013-04-20 Thread Steven Hartland
, Rainer Hurling wrote: On 20.04.2013 18:47 (UTC+2), Florian Smeets wrote: On 20.04.13 18:05, Steven Hartland wrote: When trying to boot an alternative kernel from the loader prompt it fails the first time the command is run but succeeds the second time. Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help

Re: r249939+ not detecting ata trim

2013-04-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: matt sendtom...@gmail.com To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 10:00 PM Subject: r249939+ not detecting ata trim I had been updating/porting Steve Hartland's patches for zfs trim on mps for 8.3 stable. Trim was working fine for me

Re: r249939+ not detecting ata trim

2013-04-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Steven Hartland I had been updating/porting Steve Hartland's patches for zfs trim on mps for 8.3 stable. Trim was working fine for me before r249939. When I saw that this functionality was being added to current, I built world/kernel without the patches

Re: r249939+ not detecting ata trim

2013-04-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: matt On 04/27/13 15:58, Steven Hartland wrote: If your controller doesn't support UNMAP then this will be the reason, however mps should support this. Could you confirm if previously you where seeing UNMAP as the reported delete_method? I am rebuilding

Re: r249939+ not detecting ata trim

2013-04-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: matt FYI: Change only requires kernel, world would be identical, which should save you some time. And some untrimmed deletes! Thanks, with geom/cam/disk stuff I usually assume that it could affect userland out of caution. BTW...ata identify is working

Re: r249939+ not detecting ata trim

2013-04-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: matt sendtom...@gmail.com To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 3:03 AM Subject: Re: r249939+ not detecting ata trim On 04/27/13 18:51, Steven Hartland wrote: - Original Message

Re: buildkernel fails in zlib (all)

2013-04-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: AN a...@neu.net To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 3:09 AM Subject: buildkernel fails in zlib (all) FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #62 r249867: Wed Apr 24 21:53:34 CDT 2013

Re: buildkernel fails in zlib (all)

2013-04-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: AN a...@neu.net To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 3:20 AM Subject: Re: buildkernel fails in zlib (all) On Sun, 28 Apr 2013, Steven Hartland wrote: - Original Message - From

Re: r249939+ not detecting ata trim

2013-04-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: matt sendtom...@gmail.com Here are the delete methods: deleteflag: ATA_TRIM (2) = 1 da4: Delete methods: ATA_TRIM(*) deleteflag: ATA_TRIM (2) = 1 da3: Delete methods: ATA_TRIM(*) deleteflag: ATA_TRIM (2) = 1 Here is a truncated dmesg | fgrep mps mps0: LSI

Re: Last current shows strange CAM/SCSI error on empty USB card reader on the boot

2013-05-02 Thread Steven Hartland
Yer, this one is slightly different issue than the one ken@ reported but its easy fixed, just needs:- Index: sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c === --- sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c (revision 250174) +++ sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c (working copy)

Re: Last current shows strange CAM/SCSI error on empty USB card reader on the boot

2013-05-02 Thread Steven Hartland
r250181 should fix this Andrey:- http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/250181 Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org Thank you for the report. It is known issue. Steven (the author) is already testing the solution. On 02.05.2013 09:51,

Re: ZFS error referencing Solaris

2013-05-03 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Sam Fourman Jr. Hello list, today I am trying to upgrade my fileserver, I was running a kernel based on a then HEAD snapshot from sometime in late 2009.. I exported the ZFS dataset... booted from a current HEAD snapshot and I got this error message... ZFS

Re: New umass/da errors (different with previous ATA COMMAND PASS THROUGH)

2013-05-11 Thread Steven Hartland
If this is new, it may be related to r250502 which hit the tree yesterday. Be good to confirm that by backing this one out and re-testing. Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org To: s...@freebsd.org Cc: Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org;

Re: New umass/da errors (different with previous ATA COMMAND PASS THROUGH)

2013-05-11 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org On 12.05.2013 4:08, Steven Hartland wrote: If this is new, it may be related to r250502 which hit the tree yesterday. r250502 was MFC to stable/8 while I talk about latest -current, so nothing to back out. Previous time I

Enhanced BIO_DELETE support ZFS TRIM enabled by default in current

2013-05-14 Thread Steven Hartland
Hi guys I just wanted to let everyone know that as of r249921 TRIM on ZFS is enabled by default unless you explicitly disable it using vfs.zfs.trim.enabled in loader.conf. Delete support for CAM SCSI now includes supporting ATA TRIM on SCSI controllers as long as the controller supports

Re: CURRENT r250636: ZFS pool destroyed while scrubbing in action and shutdown

2013-05-16 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Xin Li delp...@delphij.net On 05/15/13 10:20, O. Hartmann wrote: Several machines running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r250636: Tue May 14 21:13:19 CEST 2013 amd64 were scrubbing the pools over the past two days. Since that takes a while, I was sure I could

Re: CURRENT r250636: ZFS pool destroyed while scrubbing in action and shutdown

2013-05-16 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 19:42 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: - Original Message - From: Xin Li delp...@delphij.net On 05/15/13 10:20, O. Hartmann wrote: Several machines running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2013-05-19 Thread Steven Hartland
Not sure if you noticed but in the mails I got, there was link to the full output right at the bottom, so it was fairly easy to find the issue. - Original Message - From: Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org To: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org Cc: curr...@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, May 19,

Re: should TRIM be working on my ZFS L2ARC devices?

2013-06-08 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Dan Mack m...@macktronics.com To: curr...@freebsd.org Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 4:56 PM Subject: should TRIM be working on my ZFS L2ARC devices? Hiya, Hopefully a simple question on TRIM + ZFS, I have a couple L2ARCs for a zpool on a test box, two

Re: should TRIM be working on my ZFS L2ARC devices?

2013-06-08 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Dan Mack m...@macktronics.com To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: curr...@freebsd.org Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 6:38 PM Subject: Re: should TRIM be working on my ZFS L2ARC devices? On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, Steven Hartland wrote: snip Does

Re: Using camcontrol on a Corsair CSSD-F120GB2

2013-06-26 Thread Steven Hartland
Try: camcontrol security ada0 -U user -s Erase -e Erase firmware downloading is usually pretty specific so I'd expect you'll need to use the manufacturers tool for that. Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Sevan / Venture37 ventur...@gmail.com To:

Re: Using camcontrol on a Corsair CSSD-F120GB2

2013-06-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Sevan / Venture37 ventur...@gmail.com To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 1:48 AM Subject: Re: Using camcontrol on a Corsair CSSD-F120GB2 On 26/06/2013 17:08, Steven Hartland wrote: Try: camcontrol security ada0 -U user -s Erase

Re: Using camcontrol on a Corsair CSSD-F120GB2

2013-06-27 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Sevan / Venture37 ventur...@gmail.com On 27 Jun 2013, at 11:39 AM, Steven Hartland: How long did the command actually take to timeout? I ask as you may well be tripping over a timeout overfow A second? Sounds like you did overflow, try adding -T 60

Re: ZPOOL import failure due to multiple pool IDs?

2013-07-24 Thread Steven Hartland
What does zdb on each device report? Regards Steve This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using,

Re: zfs zpool import fails 9.2-beta2

2013-08-03 Thread Steven Hartland
You instructions appear to be invalid, typos? 1. There is no gpt/zil.nop 2. You create the pool ztemp but export / import zpool Few other notes:- 1. You only need to create one .nop device 2. You shouldn't need the -d's to import Removing the log and using the correct export / import names

Re: ZFS command can block the whole ZFS subsystem!

2014-01-04 Thread Steven Hartland
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:04:00 - Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: .. Sorry Im confused then as you said locks up the entire command and even worse - it seems to wind up the pool in question for being exported! Which to me read like you where saying the pool ended up being

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2014-03-03 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org on 18/10/2013 17:57 Steven Hartland said the following: I think we we may well need the following patch to set the minblock size based on the vdev ashift and not SPA_MINBLOCKSIZE. svn diff -x -p sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2014-04-24 Thread Steven Hartland
Fixed by r264883 sorry for the breakage. - Original Message - From: FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org To: FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org; curr...@freebsd.org; i...@freebsd.org Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:48 PM Subject: [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64 TB

Re: Fatal double fault in ZFS with yesterday's CURRENT

2014-05-03 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de After updating my laptop to yesterday's CURRENT (r265216), I got the following fatal double fault on boot: http://www.fabiankeil.de/bilder/freebsd/kernel-panic-r265216/ My previous kernel was based on r264721. I'm

Re: Fatal double fault in ZFS with yesterday's CURRENT

2014-05-03 Thread Steven Hartland
Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: From: Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de After updating my laptop to yesterday's CURRENT (r265216), I got the following fatal double fault on boot: http://www.fabiankeil.de/bilder/freebsd/kernel-panic-r265216/ My previous kernel

Re: Fatal double fault in ZFS with yesterday's CURRENT

2014-05-04 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de Thanks for your help testing this Fabian, I've now committed the fix for this for this: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/265321 Regards Steve ___

Re: CURRENT: why is CURRENT swapping so fast?

2014-06-11 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de Am 12.06.2014 00:36, schrieb O. Hartmann: I use my boxes for daily work and in most cases, the usage of applications is the same. Compiling the OS and updating ports while having claws-mail and firefox opened is

Re: 11.0-CURRENT #1 r267422: OpenLDAP fails to startup out of the blue after buildworld

2014-06-12 Thread Steven Hartland
I've nevery used this but Error 13 is permission denied in errno.h so I've guessing something has messed with some permissions possibly a file permission there somewhere? If its not obvious, the you could try run it under truss to see what is returning error 13. Regards Steve -

Re: ZFS ARC max sort of not working?

2014-07-04 Thread Steven Hartland
Related to the global sysctl changes recently perhaps? - Original Message - From: Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me To: freebsd-current freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 4:56 PM Subject: ZFS ARC max sort of not working? It looks like the following no longer

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

2014-07-20 Thread Steven Hartland
Can you provide the details of the zio which caused the panic? Also does any of your pools support trim? Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org To: freebsd...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 3:03 PM Subject:

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

2014-07-20 Thread Steven Hartland
Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: freebsd...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548 On 2014-07-20 14:18, Steven Hartland wrote: Can you provide the details of the zio which caused the panic? Also does

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

2014-07-20 Thread Steven Hartland
Can you try reverting r265321 and see if you still see the same crash? Regards Steve ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

  1   2   >