00 ?? RL1Jan70 0:00.28 (syncer)
.
I have kernel and core saved, if someone needs them.
best regards,
taavi
---
Taavi Talvik| Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unineti Andmeside AS| phone: +372
)
---
Taavi Talvik| Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unineti Andmeside AS| phone: +372 6405150
Ravala pst. 10 | fax: +372 6405151
Tallinn 10143, Estonia |
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
I'i try to set up jail with following script, however
as result, urandom/stdin/stdout/stderr will not appear.
They exist before applying devfs rules, but I cannot find
rules how to unhide those. Any ideas!?
best regards,
taavi
PS. sshd PRNG not seeded seems to be related to urandom existance.
Current as of yesterday (actually problem presist about
month) hangs on reboot.
Only message:
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...stopped
appears. And thereafter it is dead. Cannot break to DDB anymore over
serial console. Only RESET button helps.
Motherboard is
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Taavi Talvik wrote:
Current as of yesterday (actually problem presist about
month) hangs on reboot.
Only message:
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...stopped
Turning off ACPI makes it reboot. Thanks for suggestion Gerrit!
But how is ACPI
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Taavi Talvik wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Taavi Talvik wrote:
Current as of yesterday (actually problem presist about
month) hangs on reboot.
Only message:
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Taavi Talvik wrote:
After testing, it turns out, that 'hang on reboot' problem maybe related
to mainboard (Gigabyte GA-8PE667 Ultra) and/or USB driver for Intel 82801DB.
After turning off onboard USB rebooting works even if ACPI is enabled.
It was necessary to disable only
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I ran some stuff overnight which exhausted my system's memory fairly well,
: and was also thrashing around on my network, and I woke up to find that my
: wi(4) blew
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Attila Nagy wrote:
Is there a recommended way to configure multiple devfs rules (massive jail
usage) in a standard manner? I don't see any traces of it.
Or is it up to the user how does he manage this question, for example a
shell script with the rules?
If you are using
804b91a in ?? ()
#23 0x804b6b3 in ?? ()
---Type return to continue, or q return to quit---
#24 0x80491c0 in ?? ()
#25 0x80480f9 in ?? ()
(kgdb) q
Script done on Thu Dec 16 09:20:55 1999
best regards,
taavi
-------
Taavi Talvik
an installworld, given that you want X.
Maybe knob in /etc/make.conf instead to force compiling with X?
best regards,
taavi
---
Taavi Talvik| Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unineti Andmeside AS| phone: +372 6405150
Ravala
t yet have idea of editing /etc/make.conf
best regards,
taavi
-------
Taavi Talvik| Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unineti Andmeside AS| phone: +372 6405150
Ravala pst. 10 | fax: +372 6405151
Tallinn 1014
I have included apm in kernel (cvsupped yesterday) config file. However,
it does not create /dev/apmctl
l /dev/apm*
crw-rw-r-- 1 root operator 39, 0 Jun 11 19:31 /dev/apm
How is this possible? Driver code /usr/src/sys/i386/apm/apm.c calls
creation of both device nodes around line 1106
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Takanori Watanabe wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Taavi Talvik wrote:
Yes, acpi the case. Acpi tries to emulate apm, but seams that this
emulation is incomplete. At least it does not provide support for apmd.
Actually, i should have looked at acpi sources before
14 matches
Mail list logo
