On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:18:48AM +, Aditya Sarawgi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:53:31PM -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Now bwn(4) is available at the public and waiting test and review. The
> > status of this driver is *alpha* so coul
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:21:06PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Hi, Weongyo,
>
> On 2010/02/25 16:51, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > FYI bwn(4) driver is committed into FreeBSD tree. I think the driver
> > supports your LP PHY device. After cvsup please try to rebuild siba_bw
think it looks that it could be possible to compile without pci code.
But makes sure that your device doesn't have PCI core.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-curr
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:56:50PM +, Aditya Sarawgi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:51:34AM -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:18:48AM +, Aditya Sarawgi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:53:31PM -0800, Weongyo Jeong wr
also?
One thing you can do is that trying the device with PIO mode not DMA
mode using the following tunable variable:
hw.bwn.usedma
Its default value is 1 to enable DMA operation so if you set it 0, PIO
mode would be used and could see the message like below:
bwn0: PIO
hed
>
> Am I missing anything to get this to attach at boot time? Thanks.
Maybe nothing. It looks there's a bug to attach bwn on boot time.
One thing FYI is that bwn(4)'s LP implementation has some problems to
calibrate TX so sometimes TX speed could be unstable and fluctuate.
re
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:32:40AM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:52:59 -0800
> Weongyo Jeong wrote:
>
> >> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:15:35AM +0200, Alex RAY wrote:
> >> > Hi Weongyo,
> >> >
> >> > Can new
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:50:43PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:37 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > I was extremely pleased to see this driver, so I could get off of the
> &
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:46:09PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On 3/3/10 5:04 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:50:43PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:37 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Feb 28,
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 07:57:26PM +0100, Gustau P?rez wrote:
> En/na John Baldwin ha escrit:
> > On Monday 01 March 2010 3:22:34 pm Gustau P?rez wrote:
> >
> >> En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, F
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:14 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > When it occurs again, I will get you the details and the full dmesg. Do
> > > you want a verbose dmesg, or a standard one?
> >
> >
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:44:34PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:14 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> >>>> When it occurs
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 12:05:43AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 16:16 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:44:34PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 04,
convinced that it's entirely correct (duplicate evaluation of
> device_get_ivars()),
Your patch is committed at r204992. Thank you!
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
%d\n",
> > -device_get_ivars(dev)->sd_bus->siba_type));
> > + KASSERT(((struct siba_softc *)
> > device_get_ivars(dev))->sd_bus->siba_type ==
> > + SIBA_TYPE_PCI, ("unsupported bustype %d\n",
> > + ((struct siba_softc*) de
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:10:14AM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 00:28:33 -0800
> Weongyo Jeong wrote:
>
> >> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:32:40AM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:52:59 -0800
> >> > Weongyo
'master' this time.
>
> or freebsd forums
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?s=1d3b01fbed80c61ff508e12e9805146e&t=7562
Out of curiosity, what's the difference between run(4) and rt2870 driver
written by Alexander Egorenkov? And why there are two drivers?
regards,
W
example:
${.CURDIR}/../../kern
${.CURDIR}/../../../kern
${.CURDIR}/../../../../kern
${.CURDIR}/../../../../../kern
/sys/kern
/usr/src/sys/kern
Could you please check that one of above directories exists?
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:12:05PM +0200, Alex RAY wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:13:34 -0800
> Weongyo Jeong wrote:
>
> >
> > I thought that your opinion was right and if mem is
> > 0xf400-0xf4003fff (16 Kb) I thought the device has 4 cores. However
> >
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 08:36:41AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Saturday 13 March 2010 03:42:46 Rui Paulo wrote:
> > On 13 Mar 2010, at 09:18, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:50:29AM -0800, PseudoCylon wrote:
> > >> Hello,
>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:43:57AM +0200, Alex RAY wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:55:58 -0800
> Weongyo Jeong wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:12:05PM +0200, Alex RAY wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:13:34 -0800
> > > Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> >
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:33:02AM +0200, Gustau P?rez wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit:
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:10:14AM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote:
> >> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 00:28:33 -0800
> >&
00
> vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
> class = network
>
> Should I expect this to work with to work here or try the NDIS driver?
BCM4353 uses N PHY so it's not supported by bwn(4). I think NDIS driver
is only a way
wlan0 and then restart netif.
> >
> > Then wlan0/bwn0 associates correctly with this device.
If you're a CURRENT user could you please show me the result of `netstat
-ni' after updating latest CURRENT and keeping scanning channels?
In LP-PHY AFAIK there's a DMA Fatal error issue which isn't solved yet.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ulti(sc, 0);
IN_MULTI_LOCK();
break;
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:14:19 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a question about IN_MULTI_LOCK() because it uses MTX_DEF flag
> > when it's initialized so I always encounters
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:14:19 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:17:39PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, September 10, 2010 4:28:58 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > &
patch looks almost you moved usb_process.c code into taskqueue(9)
that I means it still follows that a entry which enqueued at last should
be executed at last. It seems that at least it's not a general for
taskqueue(9). In my humble opinion it looks a trick. I think it'd
better to f
s
interfaces are printed.
Please give me some hints whether the patch is reasonable. If it's
reasonable, is there other tools which I should make patches?
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c
===
--- sbi
http://people.freebsd.org/~weongyo/patch_tcpfrto_20110205.diff
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: netinet/tcp_input.c
===
--- netinet/tcp_input.c (revision 218148)
+++ netinet/tcp_input.c (working copy)
@@ -161,6 +161,11 @@
&VNET
llow the code to find out why it has a 0
> value. If you need
> more info let me know.
Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to
read and work email and wireless stuffs.
Could you please test this symptom with attached patch? It looks in
CURRENT it missed to in
e conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...
Cannot access memory at address 0xff0127e0
(kgdb) bt
#0 0x in ?? ()
Cannot access memory at addre
time to prepare another patch. My machine
encountered another problem which looks related with serial console so I
can not test my patch due to kernel panic.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:27:31PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2010/5/6 Weongyo Jeong :
> > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Gustau P?rez wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>
> >> >> I
it to ON the machine panics.
>
> It get a trap 12, with two reasons : page fault and "bufwrite, buffer is
> not busy?"
>
> I'm running 9.0/AMD64 from 1 of May (don't know exact svn revision).
>
> Do you want me to test anything else ?
OK. The patch is
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 05:02:42PM +0200, Gustau P??rez wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit:
> > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote:
> >>> Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for bel
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:04:34AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > > Do you want me to test anything else ?
> > >
> > > OK. The patch is ready to test. Could you please test it with attached
> >
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:41:34PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > Do you want me to test anything else ?
> >
> > OK. The patch is ready to test. Could you please test it with attached
> > patch?
>
> No panic this time. I al
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Gustau P??rez wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit:
> > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote:
> >>> Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for bel
reebsd.org/~weongyo/rfc5682/
The above links include some graphs before and after applying RFC5682
patch and a patch I prepared.
If no objections I'd like to commit it into HEAD and still welcomes your
opinions and reviews.
If you have any concerns and questions please let me know.
regards
ly.
Please review and test my work and tell me if you have any concerns and
questions.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: usr.bin/netstat/inet.c
===
--- usr.bin/netstat/inet.c (revision 221564)
+++ usr.bin/netstat/inet.c (working copy)
@@ -
42 matches
Mail list logo
