Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:32:26PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 04:29:42PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
I noticed that the current ioctl processing code for drm2 implicitely
assumes that the number of native ioctls is higher than that of 32-bit
compat ones, so it
Konstantin, *, good day.
I noticed that the current ioctl processing code for drm2 implicitely
assumes that the number of native ioctls is higher than that of 32-bit
compat ones, so it immediately gives EINVAL when
nr = dev-driver-max_ioctl. Seems that in future such assumption
may not be true
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 04:29:42PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Konstantin, *, good day.
I noticed that the current ioctl processing code for drm2 implicitely
assumes that the number of native ioctls is higher than that of 32-bit
compat ones, so it immediately gives EINVAL when
nr =